1/13/2016

For those of you who tried to access this blog, according to my iPage account, there was some trouble with this blog, and they? turned it off temporarily at 1/7/2016. I did not know the blog was turned off, not until yesterday. With the help of iPage customer support, I used the SiteLock service, and then with the help of WordPress customer support, it seems like I am now able to continue using this blog. A few seconds ago, I just checked the ionicbreeze1.com public access, and it seems accessible. This hiccup(to experience a temporary decline, setback, interruption,etc.) helped me realize that, if you think this advice is valuable to you, I recommend that you make some sort of copy of these lists, just in case this blog is no longer available in the future. I can understand why you may have had trouble making copies of the lists I made in Amazon.com. However, these lists from this blog seem much easier to copy. Although I haven’t made a copy for myself, I at least have these ideas in my head somewhere. I am open to making some sort of copy for my own use, but I don’t see myself doing so unless I somehow find an absurdly easy way to do it, and I haven’t really given this copy thing much effort and thought. Well, the blog seems to be online now, so maybe you can talk to your available computer customer support and ask them how to make a copy of just the text of another blog. There’s probably some sort of easy way of doing that. I just don’t know what that easy way is. The only way I know of to copy this text is to just go to this blog, select which lists you like individually, highlight the text from that list, copy the highlighted words using your cursor, and then paste those words on your word processor. It is my hope that you can find a better way to copy these ideas than that.(At least the ‘copy and paste’ idea is better than just printing them out! Of course, printing them out is better than not having them at all.)

Use:

Let’s start the explanation of ‘Use’ with explaining the phrase ‘Private thoughts not introduced.’, and here’s an example I just rented from Amazon Video. The scene starts pretty much at the beginning of movie ‘Mr. Holmes(2015)’. According to Amazon Video, the scene starts 1 minute and 30 seconds into the movie. As a boy, his mother, and Mr. Holmes(that famous detective) is sharing the same train compartment, the boy is looking at a wasp that is outside of the train window. Sherlock Holmes notices that, and says to the boy quote-‘You shouldn’t do that…tap the glass.’ The boy responds-‘How did you know I was going to?’ [The point of that ‘Mr. Holmes’ reference is to give you an example of a person’t thoughts not introduced to anyone else, and yet another person is giving the impression that such a person’s thoughts were introduced, but in reality those thoughts were private, and not introduced to anyone! The boy’s question was very clear. He asked the man quote-‘How did you know I was going to?’

Now, that ‘Mr. Holmes’ example is there just to offer you some allowability to use this idea. The reference I use myself, and that I recommend for you to use reasonably, in school or at work, for phrase ‘Private thoughts not introduced’, is in episode 3.19 ‘Blue Ribbon Panel’ from series ‘The Good Wife(2012)’. (If you have Amazon Prime for your shipping, ‘The Good Wife’ series is offered with your Amazon Prime.) The scene starts 18 minutes and 57 seconds into the episode, when Eli Gold(Alan Cumming) proposes to Julius Cain(Michael Boatman) that they ‘flip a coin’ to decide something. The primary scene that you use to conceptualize, if you choose to do so, starts 39 minutes and 42 seconds into the episode, when David Lee(Zach Grenier) said to Julius Cain quote-‘Oh, come on. You flipped a coin or something.’ Now, when I 1st imagined it, I imagined Eli Gold being surprised when Julius Cain said that. Of course, when you watch the episode from Amazon Video, it is Julius Cain who looks surprised. Anyway, when you use this ‘Good Wife’ reference in regards to phrase ‘Private thoughts not introduced’, I recommend you imagine David Lee saying something like quote-‘You flipped a coin or something.’ The specifics I will explain later.

So, here is the gist(the main or essential part of a matter) of what I am trying to say about phrase ‘Private thoughts not introduced’. Using the quote from the boy from movie ‘Mr. Holmes’, the boy quote-‘How did you know I was going to?’, and using David Lee’s quote from tv series ‘The Good Wife’, David Lee quote-‘Oh, come on. You flipped a coin or something.’, I offer you this logical conclusion, that even though instigators in an improper context may give you the impression that they know certain particulars of your private thoughts, that does not mean that you have agreed to introduce your private thoughts to them. In the context of an experienced instigation or inadvertency, even though an instigator may give you the impression that they know something about what you are thinking, that does not automatically mean that you introduced your private thoughts to them. Here’s an illustrated example that may help you have more strength/affirmation that your private thoughts are not introduced to instigators and related inadvertencies. Of course, the example is refurbished with inapproprieities removed in relation to advice. The scene occurs in movie ‘The Chronicles of Riddick(2004)’. According to Amazon Video, the rented PG-13 version, the scene happens after Riddick(Vin Diesel) is captured by the mercenaries. After their ship uses a decoy to avoid being followed, one of the mercenaries, I think he is portrayed by actor Ty Olsson, said to another mercenary quote-‘…Unsuspected and undetected!’ The scene is located 40 minutes and 9 seconds into the movie. The enthusiasm used by that mercenary portrayed by actor Ty Olsson is meant to improve your sense of strength and affirmation when you think that your sense of ‘private thoughts not introduced’ needs it.

Before I type in how bookmark ‘Use’ relates to phrase ‘Private thoughts not introduced’, let me give you an example using bookmark ‘reverse polarity’ of how a person from a tv show is using ‘Private thoughts not introduced’. Refurbished for advice, the reference is from episode 3.20 ‘A Stitch in Time’ from series ‘Elementary(2015)’. Although the conversation starts 29 minutes and 10 seconds into the episode, the highlight of the reference starts 31 minutes into the episode,

Collin Eisely(Eric Bogosian) quote-‘By court order, every dollar I have in stocks is in a blind trust. You can look it up.’

Sherlock Holmes(Jonny Lee Miller)-‘Well, perhaps you’re selling the information for a price.’

Collin Eisely-‘And keep the proceeds where? In my mattress? The Feds audit all my accounts. I can’t win at bingo without them taking notice. Gentlemen, I have more important things to do with my day. You’re fishing; I’m not biting.’

Now, what I’ve done with that reference using bookmark ‘Reverse polarity’ and refurbished it with inapproprieities removed is to use Collin Eisely’s conversation with Detective Bell(Jon Michael Hill) and Sherlock as if Collin Eisely is innocent! If you see Collin Eisely’s conversation that way, you may notice that, even though he is not introducing his private thoughts to them, he also believes he is reasonably cooperating with their investigation.

Now, this is what I have discovered, the meaning of this discovery is identified by bookmark ‘Use’: Let’s go back to the quote made by the boy from movie ‘Mr. Holmes’, the boy quote-‘How did you know I was going to?’ That response was made while his mother was with him by an old man whom his mother is giving the impression that he is acceptable to share a train compartment with. Now, if you extrapolate from that example, in situations involving instigation, kids, teenagers and many adults would probably find instigations that give the impressions that their private thoughts were introduced, even though that impression isn’t true, that such an experience would probably be mildly disconcerting and bothersome. And so, once I have established in my mind that my own private thoughts were not introduced to anyone, once I have established a certain continuity using my private thoughts as not introduced to anyone, soon after that, I discovered that you can blame instigations and related inadvertencies that bother you, that they are trying to use your private thoughts as if they are introduced to them, when in fact those private thoughts were not introduced to any instigator. Of course, this blame is a diagnostic, not an actual blame, to clarify that your own private thoughts are indeed not introduced to any instigator. The diagnostic is like a metal detector used before boarding airplanes. Even though you don’t have any metal on you, you still get checked. The reason I am recommending to you to ‘blame’people for trying to use your private thoughts as if those thoughts are introduced to them, and of course those thoughts were not introduced to them, is because such a blame/diagnostic may be able to contemplationally quantify what is bothering you from the experience. Here’s an example: Let’s say an adult woman who is using the rest of this advice encountered while using public transportation another woman who imposed some sort of instigation upon her that gives her the impression that her private thoughts were introduced to that instigator, even though in reality her private thoughts were not introduced to her. When she blames that impression, not only does she feel that more confidently that her private thoughts are not introduced to that lady, but she also feels that she can quantify that experience more tenably! In other words, she is no longer bothered by the experience, or she is bothered noticeably less by that experience. So therefore, if you choose to use the particulars of this advice in it’s obvious context, bookmark ‘Use’ means that you are blaming the instigation for giving you the impression that your private thoughts are being used by that instigator or inadvertency, for the purposes of giving you more confidence and strength with your own sense of private thought use.

Understand use:
At times these injections can cause tissue necrosis or hamatoma too. ordine cialis on line Take canadian pharmacy for viagra an hour before making love with your partner. The risks of using a phony medicine are levitra 20 mg visit to find out more simply awful and unwanted. After this short span you become sexually able to satisfy his female partners. cialis online
Now, this is where I begin explaining the 4 variations of bookmark ‘Use’. ‘Understand use’, ‘Time lapse use’, ‘Resist use’, and ‘Distract use’.(In Wishlist #1031, I said ‘Divert use’. I made a mistake. It was supposed to be ‘Distract use’).

[Because of the time I have used to try to get this blog online, I am not able to explain more than what I originally planned to. So, I’ll stop explaining now, and I plan to continue next week.

1/19/2016

Think tank:

Before I start explaining the 4 variations of bookmark ‘Use’, I want to do 2 things: 1)I want to explain the variations in a new list. To me, when I ‘break up’ an idea that can possibly be explained in 1 list into several lists, the partitioning gives me clarification and more energy to explain that one idea. In other words, I plan to explain the variations of ‘Use’ in the next list. 2)The 2nd thing I want to do is to offer you another reason to use bookmark ‘Private thoughts not introduced’. I call this other reason ‘Think tank’. [And so, before I finish this list and begin another one, I will now explain and offer to you bookmark ‘Think tank’.

I took the phrase ‘Think tank’ from episode 5.19 ‘Think Tank’ from series ‘Star Trek: Voyager(1999)’. According to Amazon Video, the reference starts 16 minutes into the episode. For the most part, the alien known as Kurros(Jason Alexander) is showing Captain Janeway(Kate Mulgrew) and Seven(Jeri Ryan) who the members of their ‘think tank’ are.(When I would use this episode, I would pretty much just think about the space whale that is in Kurros’s ‘think tank’. It was only a few minutes ago that I looked over again that scene). Without using the definition of ‘think tank’ from a dictionary, I pretty much thought of a ‘think tank’ as a group of people making certain ideas. For the kids, when you become adults and work for companies and corporations that have more than 250? people in them, then such a company probably has a ‘think tank’. Of course, this is something that I just imagined. I don’t know for sure if companies have ‘think tanks’. Now, the ‘think tank’ that I am referring to is not directly job related. They address oddities, such as issues that people take for granted, whether or not such issues have an obvious familiarity. Anyway, if you work for a company, corporation, or business that has more than 250? people, than you probably have a ‘think tank’, and the influence of such a ‘think tank’ is like having the neutral, with inapproprieities removed, a neutral influence of ‘The Dragon’s Breath’ from movie ‘Excalibur(1981)’, or it is like having the reasonable presence of ‘The Force’ from the ‘Star Wars’ movies. For example, when you use something that you actually find interesting that is from ‘word of mouth’ from the co-workers that you work with, it is very likely that such information came from your company’s ‘think tank’.

Now, after giving you that background of what a ‘think tank’ is for this advice, here is a story that I imagined that I have been using for several years already, and the story’s name is ‘Think tank’: Basically, I imagined that I overheard from other co-workers from where I work that a government agent was going to circulate amongst us, to talk to us. I was given a few details, such as the government agent was going to be a woman, what her favorite champagne is, and a few other oddities. When I started talking to her, she looked like celebrity Naomi Watts, and in our conversation somewhere, I mentioned at least 2 of those things that were told to me by other co-workers about her. When I told her those 2 things, 1 of those things was just identifying what her favorite champagne is, she had this mild shock look coming from her face, and then she quickly left the building! Later(keep in mind that I just imagined this whole story), I realized that she told no one about those facts! [In the story, what her favorite champagne is, and the other things I was told about from other co-workers, the source of such information came from the imagined ‘think tank’ where I work. My point, if you decide to give some sort of extrapolated credibility to the story I had imagined, is that if you are aware that your own private thoughts are not introduced to anyone, than you may have a more controlled reaction, in case someone temporarily introduces in your thoughts the temporary impression that you did indeed introduce your private thoughts to someone, one caution example is like that government agent lady may have believed when I ‘imagined’ telling her about certain things that she believes, at least at the time of the incident, that she believes that only she knows such things.

To end this ‘Private thoughts not introduced’ advice, here is an example, used with inapproprieities removed, of course, of Holmes(Jonny Lee Miller) and Watson(Lucy Liu) openly determining why 20 people are in a police holding cell using their experience as investigators. According to Amazon Video, the reference begins right in the beginning of episode 2.6 ‘An Unnatural Arrangement’ from series ‘Elementary(2013)’. Here is a quote:

Holmes:-‘Each one of these men, whether they realize it or not, is telling you the story of how he came to be here. It’s written in their bearing, on their clothing.’

Watson:-‘So, look at the guy and then tell you what they did.’

When Watson started making her verbal assessments, none of the people in the holding cell were panicking. In fact, one of the men in the holding cell who was obviously noticing what they were doing said quote-‘Hey, can you do me next?’ I hope that example helps.

Rated PG viewer discretion for movie ‘Mr. Holmes’. Some viewer discretion for tv series ‘The Good Wife’. Violence, viewer discretion for sci-fi movie ‘The Chronicles of Riddick’. Violence and viewer discretion for tv series ‘Elementary’. Violence and viewer discretion for tv series ‘Star Trek: Voyager’. Violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi movie ‘Excalibur’ and the ‘Star Wars’ movies. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Private thoughts not introduced.’ and ‘Unsuspected and undetected!’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

1/6/2016

OK, here’s the study plan for this new idea I imagined: For this list, I plan to explain bookmarks ‘Composure response’ and ‘Strive’, but in a context specifically made for this idea. In the next list, I plan to explain bookmark ‘Use’ with it’s variations. These are the variations for use: ‘Time lapse use’, ‘Resist use’, ‘Divert use’, and ‘Understand use’. After the 4 variations are explained, I will use the ‘Shuffling bookmarks’ technique to show you more of it’s usefulness.This study plan may not look like much now, but once I’m done explaining the 4 variations, and if you choose to use the idea, I believe your sense of continuity may noticeably improve.

Composure response:

To start, here is a copy of a part of Wishlist #1020. According to the blog, this was typed in by me at 10/13/2015, and it’s located in category ‘composure’ from that list:

‘My point is that, when you experience mild to moderate instigations, you should be able to choose to not dismiss the composure response itself, since the composure response is coming from you, and is not necessarily obligated to the instigation that has caused the composure response. For example, in a mild context, when you do not look forward to some sort of instigation that you think will occur soon, of course you don’t look forward to the experience, but you keep the composure response associated with what you think may occur, because the composure response is coming from you, not from the instigation. Basically, the instigator may be causing you to dismiss too much of the composure response that is from you, since it is associated with an instigation you do not want to experience. Of course, you don’t always have to use this idea literally, and all of the time. With a little practice, you may develop your own sense of what and how to regulate your composure responses as it relates to instigations and inadvertencies.’

Here’s an example where composure response is used for education. The example is in episode 20.18 ‘Father Knows Worst’ from animated tv series ‘The Simpsons(2009)’. According to Amazon Video, the example begins 7 minutes and 51 seconds into the episode, when Homer is shown by a mother whose son is named Noah an example of what the show calls ‘helicopter parenting’. According to the episode, when the mother claps her hands, that is an indication for her son to say the state capitals in alphabetical order individually for each clap. In the ‘Simpsons’ example, Noah agreed to be taught by his mom the ‘helicopter parenting’ technique. Basically, when you experience an instigation using your own sense of composure response, an instigator would improperly cause some sort of composure response from you, but with the intent to show you that the composure response ‘belongs’ to the instigation, that your composure response is defined by the instigation that you experienced. Like I said from Wishlist #1020, ‘the instigator may be causing you to dismiss too much of the composure response that is from you, since it is associated with an instigation you do not want to experience.’ Even though the composure response is caused by the instigation, the composure response is still from you, not from the instigator. So, therefore, I recommend as a diagnostic question to ask yourself, ‘Is there anything wrong with my composure response?’

Again quoting from Wishlist #1020, ‘Of course, you don’t always have to use this idea literally, and all of the time. With a little practice, you may develop your own sense of what and how to regulate your composure responses as it relates to instigations and inadvertencies.’ [You may experience mild to moderate instigations that you don’t want your composure response to have any association with. Sure! I don’t use this idea all of the time myself. However, at least most of the time, when you are at school, work, or using public transportation, we are after all living in a civilized society. The mild to moderate instigations that you may be experiencing is probably trying to adversely affect how you give credibility to your composure response as it relates to what you have experienced.

Even when out of the norm sale spikes do occur they seem to be due to tadalafil price celebration. Nettle main is yet another traditionally cheapest price for sildenafil click for source now used health supplement employed to end hair thinning. Side Effects : Get emergency medical help if you have any probe cialis generika of these signs of an allergic reaction to sildenafil products must stop using it immediately and quickly inform the doctor. When you attend a racing school, purchase viagra online discover description you will enjoy the adrenaline rush like you never experienced before in your life, as well as make new, lifelong friends. Strive:

I’d like to start this explanation of ‘Strive’ with this example. The example is from near end of movie ‘Disclosure(1994)’. According to Amazon Video, the example is near end of movie, 1 hour, 59 minutes, and 34 seconds into the movie, when someone asks Tom Sanders(Michael Douglas) quote-‘Can you build the darn thing or not?’, and Sanders says quote-‘Yes, sir. We can.’ Refurbished with inapproprieities removed, of course, the idea is that Tom Sanders has a sense of striving that no one else in that room filled with employees and shareholders has, and that sense of striving allowed Sanders to explain to everyone in that room that their company can build the product in question. Also, Mr. Sanders’ use of striving was also able to continue, even with the criticisms coming from Meredith Johnson(Demi Moore). Miss Johnson’s criticism example is also located during that shareholder’s meeting, starting at 1 hour, 58 minutes, and 22 seconds into the movie.

This is the explanation as to how striving is used in relation to instigation. Let’s say, as an example, that many of the kids, when they experience instigation, use some sort of technique, such as contemplationally saying a bookmark when the instigation occurs. Now, what might happen when the kid’s perspective is already affected as he/she uses his/her bookmarks? Let’s say a kid has already experienced some sort of mild, bothersome perspective. Seconds later, the kid uses a bookmark. However, when that happens, it is like applying contemplation pressure upon an already affected perspective. The instigation is already there as the kid applies contemplation pressure upon that sense. The contemplation pressure used is like pressing one of those pens with the button at the end of it using your thumb. When a kid does that, the kid is tricked into accepting that sense of perspective, to a point, accepting it’s existence, as the kid tries to make it more tenable in his/her mind with the kid’s technique. [Now, what I recommend with this ‘Strive’ idea is that, when you do experience such an instigation where your sense of perspective is already affected, that, along with your use of bookmarks, you also choose a sense of striving that is more reasonable to use, and not just automatically use the adversely affected sense of perspective that you are trying to make more tenable. Going back to the ‘Disclosure’ example, if you watched that scene again when Mr. Sanders is informing the employees and shareholders of the company, notice that Mr. Sanders has already selected a sense of striving that is able to reasonably respond to Meredith Johnson’s accusations and explain to the employees and shareholders of the company that their product can be manufactured.(Isn’t that a sense of striving you would want to have available to you?)

Here’s another example. In movie ‘The Internship(2013)’, according to Amazon Video, the example starts 54 minutes and 32 seconds into the movie. Even though Billy McMahon’s(Vince Vaughn) team lost that Google promoted sport, Mr. McMahon said to the rest of his team quote-‘That’s the 1st time you all came together as a team.’ In other words, Billy McMahon helped the team to not just exist in their disappointments in losing that game. Instead, he helped the team use a sense of striving that is more conducive towards their primary goals.

Let me put it another way. Before using this idea, when you would experience an instigation that has already, and very quickly, adersely affected your sense of perspective, when you would use your bookmark, you were using it upon a perspective that has already been adversely affected. You were applying contemplation pressure upon a perspective that you have accepted, in a way, even though, of course, you did not agree to experience it. Now, if you choose to use this idea, instead on working upon an adversely affected perspective directly, you can now instead choose to have as your starting point a pre-selected sense of striving chosen by your intent. Now, this does not necessarily mean that your adversely affected sense of perspective is just going to go away. What this could mean is that you can now work with a sense of striving that can more reasonably tolerate more to have an adverse sense of perspective. However, having the adverse perspective is not the goal. The goal is determined by your intent, more specifically, by the sense of striving that you have chosen to use. For example, using the ‘Disclosure’ movie, even though Tom Sanders used what I believe to be an inspirational sense of striving, Meredith Johnson still openly criticized him. In ‘The Internship’ movie, even though Billy McMahon gave a clarifying speech to the team, they still lost the game. You see? The adversely affected perspective could still be there, but with this ‘Strive’ idea, you may be able to manage it more reasonably. I predict that, with a little practice, you may learn to realize that there could be many opportunities out there that may have some adverse familiarities in the beginning, and that with the use of bookmark ‘Strive’, such an idea may be very logically practical for you to use. Also, with a little more practice, the use of bookmark ‘Strive’ may also help you change to a different perspective entirely, both in a casual and in a serious context. If you don’t mind a little slime in your example, near the end of the movie ‘Disclosure’, according to Amazon Video, 2 hours and 30 seconds into the movie, Meredith Johnson was explaining to Tom Sanders that it was not her fault, but instead blamed 2 others in the company, and that even though it was their fault, she gets fired. That may be construed as an example of changing your sense of striving to create a different perspective.

As I have said in the beginning of this list, the next list will now explain bookmark ‘Use’ and it’s 4 variations. What I didn’t say in the beginning of this list is that bookmarks ‘Composure response’ and ‘Strive’ helps give more depth to those 4 variations.

Some viewer discretion for animated tv series ‘The Simpsons’. Rated R viewer discretion for movie ‘Disclosure’. Rated PG-13 viewer discretion for movie ‘The Internship’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Composure response’ and ‘Strive’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

12/30/2015

I don’t have enough time today to type something in because this past Sunday, the cord from my headphones somehow got caught to my leg and foot, and as I walked away from the laptop, the cord pulled the laptop to the ground, causing the screen to break. The following day, Monday, I purchased a new laptop, but the store I bought it from won’t have the new laptop until 3 pm the next day, but I wasn’t able to personally get the computer until today. And so, it took me some time today to get the new laptop set up. I made the internet cord connected to my laptop shorter, so in case the laptop falls again, it is unlikely to hit the ground.

So, what I’ll do is add a new idea this Friday, Jan. 1, since I chose to have a day off that day, and the once a week idea schedule will be back on track. Hopefully, my new computer excuse is good enough for you.

See you this Friday!

1/1/2016

Again, I started late, and again, I am choosing to postpone the explanation. I don’t think this is a major setback, based on an obligation of 1 idea per week. All I have to do is type in twice the amount of work next week. I could type in something now, but it’s already 5:44 pm where I am at. At least this new laptop is working normally. I also purchased with this laptop a mouse, and the mouse seems to be working acceptably. Before using a mouse, according to the Amazon web site, I purchased on October 13, 2013 gloves that have silver tips. The glove is called a Dragonpad Smart Glove Touch Glove. The silver tips on the gloves allow you to use touchscreen devices. I used the glove on my right hand to move the cursor on the laptop screen. That means that, according to Amazon, since October of 2013, I have been typing on a laptop wearing a glove on my right hand! Well, with this new laptop, I am now using a computer mouse to move the computer cursor, which means I am now able to type without needing to wear a glove on my right hand. I mentioned in the Amazon lists that I have purchased these gloves to help me use the touchpad on the laptop I was using. Well anyway, all this happened because I accidentally broke the previous laptop’s computer screen. Unless something else happens, I don’t see any more delays occurring. I’ll start typing ideas this coming Wednesday, January 6. If I can, I may also type in ideas sooner than that.

1/5/2016

The Great Wall:

I want to explain this idea now before the next new idea, because if I explain this idea after the next new idea, this question may occur. I imagined celebrity Tina Fey saying this question in an episode of ‘Saturday Night Live’. This imagined event is based on Tina Fey’s recent performance in tv show ‘Saturday Night Live’, when she co-hosted with Amy Poehler less than a few weeks ago. I imagined Tina Fey saying in a ‘Saturday Night Live’ episode quote:-‘Oh, that is because of the idea before it!’ She is referring to bookmark ‘The Great Wall’, if I explained it after the next idea is explained. In other words, I anticipate that the next idea fully explained will probably improve your sense of continuity, and if I explain bookmark ‘The Great Wall’ after the next new idea, then many of you may believe that much of it’s sense of benefit comes from the new idea that was just explained before it. And so, to avoid that, I have decided to explain bookmark ‘The Great Wall’ now.
It helps to dilate the blood vessels of cialis order the penis can be relaxed. This allows achieving a stronger erection levitra prescription cost for a longer period.There are several causes for ED, it may be physiological or psychological. Do not get attracted with lucrative offer some fake pharmacies dealing in fake sildenafil citrate medicines for erectile dysfunction and other kind pfizer viagra australia of sexual difficulties in men. First of all, you charge to accept that one of the most usual sorts of joint free levitra disease.
I believe the idea started from episode 4.14 ‘Journey’s End’ from series ‘Doctor Who(2008)’. According to Amazon Video, the scene occurred 32 minutes and 49 seconds into the episode, when The Doctor(David Tennant) said to Davros(Julian Beach) quote-‘They’re trying to help.’ Of course, I refurbished that scene in my mind to be used for something useful. (Keep in mind that this idea was created in year 2008, before I started this blog.) Basically, somewhere in the beginning when I used this idea, I imagined people using a certain expectation can be conceptualized as having ‘walls’, evaluation obstacles that, when I would contemplationally say the words ‘They’re trying to help.’, those evaluation obstacles would reveal themselves to me. I would use such an idea to make more ideas, and to cope.(I say ‘cope’ in a context that was used for private thinking, not in a context that I believe many people would just reveal to each other in casual conversation.) Anyway, I eventually upgraded the use of the idea to create the bookmark that is now called ‘The Great Wall’. The name comes from the movie ‘Star Trek V: The Final Frontier’, when Sybok used The Enterprise to get through the barrier that is located at the center of the galaxy.

I called the barrier from the ‘Star Trek V’ movie ‘The Great Wall’, and then I imagined the original ‘Star Trek’ series(1966-1969) to consist mostly of The Enterprise crew interacting will aliens that have a better knowhow of the universe than The Enterprise crew has. On several of these imagined episodes, some of the aliens that The Enterprise crew have encountered would talk about what The Enterprise crew believed ‘The Great Wall’ was. The aliens already knew that ‘The Great Wall’ was part of a prison for a certain alien, but the aliens did not say anything to The Enterprise crew at the time, since the aliens were also learning from The Enterprise crew.

The point I am trying to make with how I imagined most of the aliens interacting with The Enterprise crew is that, even though most of the aliens that encountered The Enterprise crew in this imagined situation had a much more developed, more advanced knowhow of what the universe is, what the sci-fi show of this imagined situation would mostly illustrate that there is also a benefit for those aliens to learn from The Enterprise crew, even though such aliens have a more advanced knowhow of what the universe is. [Now, the point I am trying to make as it relates to you is that certain mild to moderate instigations that you may have already experienced may have caused you firmly reject interjections and notions identified by your own sense of knowhow. Here is a question for the advice: ‘How is that a bad thing?’ For example, what if you were presented with a job opportunity, and when you were allowed to participate with that job opportunity before making a commitment to it, the reason you rejected committing to such a job opportunity is because there were many details about the job that your knowhow could easily refute. Now, what if the attitude that you used to refute certain characteristics of job opportunities were adversely influenced by instigations and related inadvertencies? To test the integrity of this idea, I recommend that you recall certain mild to moderate instigations that you have already experienced, and ask yourself this question: ‘Does such an experience adversely influence how I  reject certain characteristics of job opportunities?’

Let me try to say this another way: The aliens in the Star Trek situation I imagined allowed themselves to learn from The Enterprise crew, even though their knowledge of the universe is vastly more developed than those from The Federation and The Enterprise crew. The aliens were still able to learn and participate with The Enterprise crew, even though their own sense of knowhow can easily reject certain characteristics presented by The Enterprise crew. Now, if the instigations you have experienced have caused you to avoid certain opportunistic participations simply because your own knowhow can reject certain characteristics of such opportunistic participations, let’s say you can still reasonably participate, but how you reject those characteristics cause you to not participate, then what type of opportunities will you participate in? You see, in my opinion, all an instigator has to do to cause you to choose not to participate in a certain opportunity is simply to add to that opportunity something that your knowhow can easily refute.

The solution, in my opinion, if you have already experienced such instigations, is to simply allow yourself to gradually accept interacting with certain characteristics of opportunities that your knowhow can easily reject, (and of course you can also reasonably participate), and those characteristics don’t have to be instigation related.

Now, going back to the experience of such an instigation, an instigation does not have to specifically ‘say’ that it’s trying to adversely affect how your knowhow evaluates certain characteristics. It can instead just cause you to have a certain adverse effect upon you, and that adverse effect, even though it does not seem specifically related to affecting your use of knowhow, the effect itself may be causing you to have such a use of knowhow.

Now, the problem I have giving you an illustrated example, whether it’s from a tv show or a movie, is that the example, when explained into words, has a certain personal effect upon the innocent person that has been wronged that maybe my ability to put into words cannot explain, and if the explanation is not adequate, one result if that innocent person could comment upon those words would be to add something to the words to help emphasize it’s meaning, and unfortunately according to my imagination, if someone tries to add such words, those words may dilute the original meaning of those words. Basically, I cannot think of any tv show or movie example that can articulate someone’s original experience of such an instigation. Such tv shows and movies may exist, I just don’t know any of them.

Some viewer discretion for tv series ‘Saturday Night Live’. Violence, viewer discretion for sci-fi tv series ‘Doctor Who’ and ‘Star Trek(1966+)’. Rated PG viewer discretion for movie ‘Star Trek V: The Final Frontier(1989)’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmark ‘The Great Wall’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

12/25/2015

Time lapse:

First, I’d like to say that, even though it’s Christmas, I believe that many of you who are reading this(if anyone is reading this at all), are a lot like me, in the context that we’re not really doing anything compared to the sense that Christmas gives us. That being said, I still would like to say ‘Merry Christmas’ to you anyway.

And now, the advice. The definition of ‘Time lapse’ comes from a ‘Chia Pet’ commercial that I watched from youtube.com. If you choose to see the commercial, just go to web site www.youtube.com, type ‘chia pet commercial’ in the search engine, search for it, and the commercial I used was the one that was viewed over 747,000 times, and was made available over 9 years ago, according to youtube. When you watch the commercial, you will see illustrations of the ‘Chia Pet’ seeds grow very quickly. The illustration would state that full? growth would take 1-2 weeks. Now, what I will do with this ‘Time lapse’ definition is give you several examples as it relates to instigation.

Here is the 1st example: I believe that many of the casual instigations that innocent people experience, such as when they are using public transportation when commuting to and from work, are imposed upon them to experience in a brief, quick, manner, and that all of those brief, quick interjections of instigations may give innocent people a false and misleading sense of time lapse, as it relates to the interpretation of other notions. [Unfortunately, I don’ t have a specific example to give you. I do have an example for myself, of course, but even though it wouldn’t be entirely inappropriate for me to type such an example in, the level of embarrassment that it would cause me to experience makes the example unacceptable for me to type in. So therefore, I don’t have an example to give you. However, I do have a ‘pending’ example for this idea, ‘pending’ meaning an example I recommend to use to try to discover the answer. The ‘pending’ example is in episode 6.2 ‘Day of the Moon’ from series ‘Doctor Who(2011)’. According to Amazon Video, the reference begins 10 minutes and 32 seconds into the episode. Here is the quote:

The Doctor(Matt Smith):-‘Take a good long look.'(Everyone is looking at a hologram. The Doctor then turns off the hologram). You just saw an image of one of the creatures we’re fighting. Describe it to me.

This is said to be a perfect product for the treatment of erectile buy online viagra dysfunction or as it is famously known as impotence. Usually pain is caused due to poor lubrication or conditions like vaginismus. appalachianmagazine.com purchase viagra online Some of the medicine that are of generic medicine is cheaper than all branded medicine and it is as cheap as 15 times less than the overnight cialis soft. It just requires cialis pills canada appalachianmagazine.com sexual stimulation to work flawlessly. Canton Delaware(Mark Sheppard):-‘I can’t’.

The Doctor:-‘No. Neither can I.’

Of course, for that example, I represent The Doctor, you represent the other people in the Tardis, and none of us can explain what we have just seen. However, since I represent The Doctor, I think I am a little ahead of the race here, since I am the one that is leading the explanation. You may watch a little more of that scene, both before and after the quote, in relation to advice, if you want more background about it.

The next ‘Time lapse’ example starts using episode 2.8 ‘I, Mudd’ from series ‘Star Trek(1967)’. According to Amazon Video, the reference starts 36 minutes and 43 seconds into the episode, when Captain Kirk(William Shatner) says quote-‘Next we take the Alices on a trip through Wonderland.’ Refurbished for advice, of course, the emphasis of the ‘Star Trek’ reference is when the androids are deactivated by the misleading portrayals of the Enterprise crew. Their deactivation, refurbished for advice, of course, is an example of how your own sense of self appearance is targeted by the ‘Time lapse’ instigation that is being explained. I call this bookmark ‘Time lapse, self appearance’. When you experience such an instigation, you may try to figure it out using what you are perceiving as a reference point, when in fact the instigator’s target is your own sense of self appearance. While you are looking for a solution based on what you are perceiving, with the influence of such an instigation, you have left your guard down somewhat your own sense of self appearance. Notice the refurbished similarities from the ‘Star Trek’ episode. While the androids are trying to resolve what they are perceiving, their own sense of self appearance is being manipulated by the Enterprise crew. So far, this ‘Star Trek’ reference is the only example I can think of right now that may help you understand such an instigation phenomena. [The solution, with the rest of this advice, is to contemplationally use the bookmark, ‘Time lapse, self appearance’, when needed. The use of the bookmark is to help you identify how such an instigation is trying to influence your sense of self appearance. Of course, if you have also read Wishlists #1003-1008, which is provided for you in this blog, you may also choose to use your experience with blinking to resolve the ‘self appearance’ issue.

I guess I could type in more, but I don’t want to spend too much time today in front of the computer. See you next week!

Violence, viewer discretion for sci-fi series ‘Doctor Who’ and ‘Star Trek’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode and series. [Use mental bookarks ‘Time lapse’ and ‘Time lapse, self appearance’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

12/23/2015

reverse polarity(revisited):

1st, I’d like to say that I lost track of time because I was buying clothes for myself online. I guess I was in the imagined ‘Christmas rush’ mood to buy things at the last minute, except that I was using that rush to buy things for myself. 2nd, since I am taking off from work for Christmas Day, I will be able to spend more non scheduled time with these lists. So, since I am late, but I have some extra time in Christmas Day, I have decided to give you an upgrade for an idea that I have given you over 4 months ago. That idea is called ‘Reverse polarity’. I have given you the idea in Wishlist #1015. The gist(the main or essential part) of it was in 8/12/2015 of that list, when I said quote:

‘And so, at this point, I decided to try something different. I imagined 2 instigators, 1 instigator to my left holding my arm, and one instigator to my right holding my right arm, forcing me to go into one of those airplanes. However, even though they have forced me to be in one of those airplanes, in the context of the idea, that is where I wanted to be! Basically, I have reversed the polarity of certain instigations to be in my favor, instigations that, for the purposes of explanation, would not occur at all in reality, simply because such instigations benefit the innocent person unusually well, in the context for the innocent person to learn and build his/her ideas for instigation.’

If you have read Wishlist #1015, and have chosen to use the idea of ‘reverse polarity’, then I offer you an upgrade for that idea, in the context of standard demographic advice, of course. The idea I’m about to type in is created from 100% imagination, but even though it is, I believe this idea may be useful to you. So, I’d like to start with episode 1.12 ‘Seeds’ from series ‘Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.(2014)’. According to Amazon Video, one of the references from that episode start 3 minutes and 3 seconds into the episode, when Grant(Brett Dalton), Skye(Chloe Bennett), Jemma(Elizabeth Henstridge), and Fitz(Iain De Caestecker) talk about S.H.I.E.L.D. Academy. With the inapproprieities removed, of course, the other references are from the episode that addresses other interactions in S.H.I.E.L.D. Academy. With the help of this ‘Seeds’ episode, you may be able to imagine, if you choose to, that there are learning institutions from the U.S. government, one illustration is S.H.I.E.L.D. Academy, that are classified(confidential or secret) from the general public. So, what I did with these classified learning institutions is to imagine using the idea of ‘reverse polarity’ to allow me to experience from them instigations that would be in my favor, and in the context of an idea that I was developing. I am assuming that many civilians don’t know of any government agents personally, so starting from that assumed perspective, I imagined the possibility of knowing somewhat government agent Phil Coulson(Clark Gregg) from the ‘Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.(2013)’ series. If you give this imagined idea some imagined credibility, it is possible for a civilian to know Phil Coulson. After all, he does live in America, and he does interact with the general public from time to time. Therefore, I imagined an American civilian who was able to talk Coulson into getting some sort of resourceful reciprocation for that civilian’s use of ‘reverse polarity’. In this idea, Coulson brought this civilian to one of the classified learning institutions that is not from S.H.I.E.L.D.(that is how I imagined it), and he had a talk with that civilian with one of their faculty members. Coulson explained to that faculty member what that civilian wanted, in a context that is mixed in with Coulson’s knowhow, and although that faculty member agreed with Coulson, that faculty member also stated that they do not have any active resources that can accomodate such a request. So, what Coulson did was verify with that faculty member that such a request does have validity, and Coulson, with the help from that faculty member, used Coulson’s own resourcefulness to accomodate that civilian’s request. [With that in mind, and with the imagined help of Coulson, I imagined that, with the help of at least most of the classified learning institutions from America, starting from the year 1985(because of the movie ’42(2013)’ starring Chadwick Boseman as baseball player Jackie Robinson, I figured that the year 1985 is a relatively safe year to start imagining the use of most classified learning institutions, since I imagined that certain issues of discrimination were no longer a problem), I would imagine that, using the idea of ‘reverse polarity’, that these learning institutions would allow me to experience instigations that were in my favor and in the context of the idea that I was developing. To clarify, here is an example of what I am talking about: In the movie ‘Charlie and the Chocolate Factory(2005)’, according to Amazon Video, the example starts 22 minutes and 23 seconds into the movie. It illustrates Violet Beauregarde’s(AnnaSophia Robb) familiarity with a certain martial arts. It is my impression that she is participating in some sort of martial arts practice. The highlight of this reference is when the 2 men she was sparring with are shown to be on the ground. For the use of this advice, I have interpreted her sparring session as follows: the 2 men on the floor are her instructors, and since she has executed her movements correctly, the men chose to present one of the results of her efforts by being on the ground as part of how both instructors wanted to teach her, and of course in a manner of speaking, Violet agreed to be taught in such a manner. So, if you imagine the mechanics of thinking involved in Violet’s sparring lesson, you may imagine the 2 men not specifically representing instigators, but rather the 2 men are representing experiencing some sort of instigation that is from those classified learning institutions, with the help of Coulson, and of course the instigation is in your favor, meaning that you are not one of those 2 men that are on the floor.(Of course, you can change this idea within reason. This is just part of the explanation.). [This idea is not designed to hurt you. It is designed to help you develop the ideas that you are reasonably working on using the idea of ‘reverse polarity’. For example, when I use this particular idea with some sort of idea that I am developing, I would think ‘1985+’, which would represent at least most of the classified learning institutions from 1985 to now that are allowing me to experience some sort of instigation that is in my favor, with the help of Coulson, and of course within reason. However, when I would think of such an idea, I would get almost nothing. There is no specific anything for many expectations that I would experience when I would use such an idea. However, I still believe that the idea is useful to me. It is like a specific generalistic sense of inspiration that you would create for yourself. Also, if you are a civilian and not a government agent, one would assume that most civilians do not even know if such classified learning institutions even exist, so therefore, for certain expectations, why would you think of something specific, if you are not even sure they exist in the 1st place? Also, even if you do believe that such learning institutions do exist in America, as a civilian, you are probably not aware from personal experience how such an experience would be given to you, since you are not aware of the specific techniques that such classified learning institutions are using. You see? You use this idea to help you develop your own ideas, even though the idea is created from imagination.
This indicates that http://deeprootsmag.org/2014/01/25/africa-home-captivating-look-captivating-woman/ cialis uk age is not the same. lowest cost cialis If you are looking to get rid of all sexual ailments. It promotes physical wellbeing by generic viagra generic making the courses smooth and adaptable. Amatory affair is the exciting sexual love between the two partners to satisfy their sexual accomplices. viagra stores
If you attended college, than this idea may more likely work for you. It is my believe that experiencing instigation in general may wear down the resolve that you had developed when you attended college, a college specific resolve. So, when you use this idea, when you use that ‘Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.’ reference, that may help re-invigorate some of that sense of college specific resolve that you have lost because of experiencing instigation in general. Of course, you can use other moments in that ‘Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.’ episode that illustrates interactions in their S.H.I.E.L.D. Academy, with inapproprieities removed, of course.

And to complement your imagination in reference to classified learning institutions, you may want to check the illustrations regarding the ‘Unseen University’ from the science fiction movie ‘Hogfather(2006)’, with inapproprieities removed, of course.

I have also used in imagination celebrity Tom Cruise as IMF agent Ethan Hunt in his ‘Mission: Impossible’ movies. I believe that, in the context of movies, of course, since he is very good at networking, he gives some normal civilians the ability to participate in certain network created agendas. Basically, I believe he may be very easy to imagine giving other people a certain civilian related ‘piece of the action’, so to speak, but the problem with Ethan Hunt is that he just does movies. Since the character Phil Coulson does tv shows, I believe that the tv shows give you more to work with.

Violence, viewer discretion for sci-fi tv series ‘Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.’. PG-13 viewer discretion for movie ’42’. Rated PG viewer discretion for movie ‘Charlie and the Chocolate Factory(2005)’. Violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi movie ‘Hogfather(2006)’. Violence and viewer discretion for the ‘Mission: Impossible’ movies. Use only refurbished for advice references mentioned. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Reverse polarity’ and ‘1985+’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

12/9/2015

Because I think these ideas may be kind of serious at times, I want to introduce to you a song that I have just been made aware of a few days ago. While using my(not actually my service, but I think you can say it that way) cable tv service, I looked at one of it’s music channels, where they would give photos and information about the band that has created the music that is being played. I did this only a few days ago, and it was the 1st time I can recall hearing that song. The band playing that song is called ‘Walk the Moon’ and the song is called ‘Shut Up and Dance’. The intent of the use of this song is to change the mood of these ideas for the better. If you choose to listen to this song, and it is your 1st time doing so, I recommend that you look at the lyrics. I am no music expert, but the 1st verse of the song, which starts as ‘Oh don’t you dare look back’ is not that interesting. It’s not until the words in that verse repeats in the 4th verse that you can hear the difference. Based on my experience, it is like the song is teaching you to appreciate it. I hope that this change of pace benefits you. If you choose to, there’s more information about the band ‘Walk the Moon’ and their song ‘Shut Up and Dance’ at web site www.wikipedia.com. Just type ‘walk the moon’ in wikipedia’s search engine, and search for it. It should bring you right to the information. According to wikipedia, song ‘Walk the Moon’ was digitally released on September 10, 2014.

Since for me it is already 4:08 PM EST, and I admit that I should have started earlier, I only have time to give you the idea that I have recently invented. I was planning to give you an explanation that started ‘from the beginning’, using bookmarks ‘Manage’, ‘Strive’, and ‘Equate’, the 3 bookmarks I introduced to you from Wishlist #1026, the previous list, but that would take way too long to explain. And so, the best course of action I believe is available is to just give you the explanation for my most recent bookmark, a bookmark that was created from bookmarks ‘Manage’, ‘Strive’, and ‘Equate’.

I believe that the best way to explain this idea is to explain the 2 references that I have given it. Basically, I am not as prepared to explain this idea as I am explaining previous ideas. However, based on my speculation and imagination, I believe that many of you have ‘said’ that the references that I have given for previous ideas are the ones that allowed the ideas to be acceptable to you in the 1st place. So, what I will try to do is give you this idea by using the 2 references that I have selected for this idea as the answer. If that doesn’t work, I still think that the advice that I have tried to give to you may still be useful to you.

The 1st reference is what I use as a ‘fun’ reference, because of it’s obvious, blunt way of demonstrating. The reference is in episode 5.4 ‘The Daedalus Variations’ from series ‘Stargate:Atlantis(2008)’. According to Amazon Video, the reference starts 5 minutes and 20 seconds into the episode, when the lights in the spaceship Daedalus seem to mysteriously go on, according to Sheppard(Joe Flanigan). Here’s the quote:

Sheppard:-‘McKay, is that you?'(In reference to the spaceship’s power being turned back on)

Rodney McKay(David Hewlett):-‘Of course it was me. Who else would it be? Do you think we’ve got a ghost on board or something?’

And, if you look closely at what Ronon(Jason Momoa) did at that moment when Rodney was startled, it is my belief that Ronon intentionally created a ruckus sound to startle Rodney temporarily, a sound that is supposed to coincide with Rodney’s statement about ghosts being on board the Daedalus. When Rodney turned around to tell Ronon to watch what he is doing, Ronon gave the impression that the sound created by him was accidental, when in reality that sound was intentional.

[The 2nd reference is in episode 3.13 ‘The Arrow That Is Not Aimed’ from series ‘Magnum, P.I.(1983)’. Amazon offers season 3 on DVD. The DVD/Blu-ray mail service I use also offers season 3 DVDs to be rented. However, the quickest way I know of if you don’t have the DVD available is to watch the episode from www.youtube.com. Just type in ‘the arrow that is not aimed’ in youtube’s search engine, search for that phrase, and it should show you an option to watch it’s full episode. According to a selection that I have made in youtube, I’m using an option that has an episode run time of 45 minutes and 58 seconds, and according to that youtube reference, the reference begins 23 minutes and 15 seconds into the episode, when Higgins(John Hillerman) opens the door to find Thomas Magnum(Tom Selleck) sleeping off a hangover he acquired from drinking sake(Japanese rice wine) the night before. Now, this ‘Magnum, P.I.’ reference is the primary reference to use when you experience the instigation that this advice is trying to describe.

[I am choosing to stop right now. To explain myself, I think I was recovering from some sort of flu that started a few days ago, and even though I feel OK right now, based on results, my energy levels to type such advice do not seem to be the same as before. I plan to try to finish this format of explanation next week, and of course, the 2 references used are refurbished with inapproprieities removed for advice. Throw away the rest of the episodes that are not used for this advice.

12/15/2015

Here’s a quote from what I said last week:

‘So, what I will try to do is give you this idea by using the 2 references that I have selected for this idea as the answer.’

I have decided that I can’t do that. However, of course I will use the 2 references in the answer that I plan to give you. It’s just that I won’t be able to use the 2 references as if they were the answer.

Since I try to take into consideration that kids could be reading this, there is an example I would like to offer you from the movie ‘Willow(1988)’. In it, Madmartigan(Val Kilmer) for a long period of time would call Willow(Warwick Davis) a ‘Peck’.(I don’t know what that means). My point is that many of the kids I imagine would like to articulate a certain thought, in relation to advice said, of course, in regards to me not being able to use those 2 references as the answer. So, what I did, and I think I started this idea around 1:50 PM EST(Eastern Standard Time) yesterday, which means I already planned this idea out yesterday, was that I conceptualized a room of leisure that has a ball of light that represents within reason your associated thought that you believe should be there with the fact that I wasn’t able to give you the 2 references as the answer. The room of leisure looks like a library room, a typical library room that many? rich people may have in their homes, a library room that they would allow children to use, let’s say for their homework. However, for this advice, I treat an imagined copy of their library rooms as a sort of living room and dining room. I eat there and read leisure magazines. In episode 3.1 ‘The Troll Farmer’ from series ‘The Blacklist(2015)’, according to Amazon Video, the scene is located 6 minutes and 37 seconds into the episode, when Reddington(James Spader) says to Elizabeth Keen(Megan Boone) quote:

Gulp the pills at once never ever over intake the drugs in cialis canada any manner as it may bring worst side-effects. Focus on your body’s natural ability cheap sildenafil india to get rid from toxins. Buying a medicine with sildenafil buy viagra online Visit This Link citrate has enabled millions of men to avail a high quality medication without paying much. Today, when erectile dysfunction has become a common problem, which is particularly among older men and it might cheapest tadalafil india be linked to total health in various ways than you can even imagine. Reddington:-‘Actually, a week may be nice. I’ll finally get the time to catch up on some back issues of ‘Bassmaster’.’

So, using the refurbished for advice from that ‘Blacklist’ episode, when I am in that library room, I imagine myself sometimes reading back issues of Bassmaster. After all, Reddington was looking forward to reading ‘Bassmaster magazine’ for an entire week. So, basically, what’s in this room is ball of light, like the size of a light bulb, somewhere in the library room, and sometimes I am reading ‘Bassmaster magazine’ when I am in that room, and that ball of light represents a certain thought kids (and adults, I guess) expect to be there in reference to me not being able to present the 2 references as an answer.

Here’s a question for this advice: ‘So, what is this thought?’ One example is from the movie ‘Willow(1988)’, when Madmartigan would call Willow a ‘Peck’ for a long period of time. You see, the difficulty for me to acknowledge that such a thought should be there is that it is only just one thought. I don’t think people have normal conversations consisting of just one thought. I imagined a mix of the character Dr. Joan Watson portrayed by celebrity Lucy Liu and Lucy Liu herself being an avatar, someone who represents me, to be in that library room talking to a lady, and this lady was just talking about that one thought with her the whole time! Lucy Liu would listen to her and talk back to her, but such a dialogue just didn’t seem right. I also imagined myself in that library room reading a copy of ‘Bassmaster’, the magazine is in front of my face, and when I would move the magazine to the right, for one situation, I would see a boy smiling at me, of course the boy was articulating that one thought. I imagined a similar boy being there the 2nd time I moved the magazine, and this time the boy was just staring at me. Soon after that, I realized that it’s just practical to have a ball of light representing that one thought that should be there to represent all of them. As for the girls, I imagined one girl just visiting to check if her one thought is there, and then she would leave. Of course, since it’s purpose is to make better ideas, that ball of light is always in that room, whether or not the kids are aware of it.

The 1st point I wanted to bring up because I wasn’t able to make those 2 references into the answer was that ‘ball of light’ idea. The 2nd point starts with a scene from episode 1.1 ‘Josh Just Happens to Live Here!’ from series ‘Crazy Ex-Girlfriend(2015)’. According to Amazon Video, the scene starts 6 minutes and 38 seconds into the episode, when Josh(Vincent Rodriguez III) was explaining to Rebecca(Rachel Bloom) why he was leaving New York. Here’s the quote:

Josh:-‘Yeah, I’ve been trying to make it work here in the Big Apple, and one day I realized, why get stuck in a rat race? I mean, what’s the point, right?’

To make a long story short, when Josh from the show ‘Crazy Ex-Girlfiend’ decided in his mind that he was going to leave New York, it is my opinion that he had ‘forgotten’ much of what he did when he was trying to make a life for himself in New York. Now, even though I have tried to provide for you in imagination a place for your thoughts to be allowed to exist somewhere, it is still my concern that, when you make such a decision, let’s say those thoughts resemble a certain specific criticism towards me, which, within reason, I have allowed, that you might have ‘forgotten’ some of the things that you have learned as I tried to give you the answer that I have said that I will try to give you. You see, when I make these ideas, I try to make useful as much as I reasonably can. That includes my efforts to try to make an idea work, and the obvious realizations that I cannot meet certain expectations that I have set out to accomplish. So, for example, as a recommendation, if you can try to remember the efforts of your strivings, as well as the obvious realizations that certain expectations that you have chosen cannot be met, I believe that such a recall can benefit you.

Going back to the ‘Josh’ example, when he said that quote, I imagined certain moments in his New York life that he had ‘fogotten’, once he had decided to leave New York. I remember the job related social events that he had attended. I remember his colleagues both ridiculing him and speaking fondly of him. I remember the moments when Josh would talk to some of the employees in the company that he worked for, and such conversations reveal to me that many of the people that he worked with accepted him with open arms, and they see a promising, continuity of future with him and the company. All those things Josh seemed to have ‘forgotten’ once he decided to leave New York, once he decided that New York was too much of a ‘rat race’ for him.

[I am going to take a break right now. I may continue this later today, and I plan to finish this by tomorrow.

12/16/2015

Argue anticipate:

This is what I am going to do, since I have only given myself 2 hours to do it. I am going to combine bookmark ‘Argue’ from Wishlist #1017, which was created at 10/1/2015, and combine that with bookmark ‘Anticipate’, a bookmark that I will introduce to you soon.(Of course, even though you may just use bookmark ‘Argue’, ‘Argue’ was created from the 4 other bookmarks from Wishlist #1017. I don’t think you need to keep that in mind, but I also don’t think you can separate the definition of ‘Argue’ and use it effectively when it is not just used from your thoughts. For example, when you type in the definition of ‘Argue’ only and give that definition to others. That definition of ‘Argue’ alone may not work, unless you also give them the rest of Wishlist #1017). And so, here is the explanation: Basically, this explanation begins with episode 3.13 ‘The Arrow That Is Not Aimed’ from series ‘Magnum P.I.(1983)’. According to youtube.com, a web site that allows you to watch the reference streaming for free, the reference that I am using now from youtube has a run time of 45 minutes and 58 seconds. To find that reference, just type in ‘magnum pi the arrow that is not aimed’ in youtube’s search engine, and it should? offer it to you.(I don’t know how reliable youtube is in regards as to offering tv shows for the public to watch). Of course, you also have the option of buying the DVD from Amazon, or renting the DVD from a DVD rental service that offers it. Anyway, in that tv show, the reference is located 23 minutes and 15 seconds into the episode, when Higgins(John Hillerman) is communicating with Thomas(Tom Selleck) using notes, since Higgins knows that Mr. Magnum is experiencing some sort of hangover from drinking sake(Japanese rice wine) the night before. Now, the point of the reference is to offer you an illustration that may help you relate with this particular instigation that I am trying to explain to you, if you experienced such an instigation before. It is when an instigator improperly imposes some sort of taxed effort upon your sedentary, calm chosen use of composure in such a way that it overemphasizes an out of context sense. I call this misdirection a mistake that overemphasizes another mistake. So, using the ‘Magnum P.I.’ reference again, the scene when Higgins rings the big bell. That scene in youtube starts 24 minutes and 24 seconds into the episode. Let’s say that big bell ringing represents a mistake that overemphasizes an out of context notion response in your mind, and it’s because it’s ‘out of context’, for the purposes of this advice, that is why the ‘out of context’ notion is called a mistake. So, the big bell ringing is the ‘mistake’ that is overemphasizing the ‘out of context’ notion that you have been following, the other ‘mistake’. If you have been experiencing such an instigation in the past, one possible reason you are being troubled by such an instigation is that the ‘mistake’ is misdirecting you to give credence to a composure response that is out of context, and this particular instigation only happens when you choose to have a sedentary, calm composure. That is why I chose ‘The Arrow That Is Not Aimed’ reference for you to consider, because Mr. Magnum’s composure is chosen by Magnum to be VERY sedentary and calm. Of course, I am not saying that you have some sort of sake hangover when the instigation happens. It’s just that this is the best reference I can think of that represents a person choosing to have a sedentary, calm composure as he/she experiences some sort of event, and of course the event is refurbished for advice to represent an instigation.

‘Anticipate’ comes from the Chloraseptic commercial that you may find in youtube.com. Just type in ‘chloraseptic it will hurt if i swallow’ in the youtube.com search engine, search for it, and it has a 31 second commercial with a girl who has a sore throat. The commercial illustrates the girl’s specific thoughts that pertain to her sore throat by the girl’s words saying ‘It will hurt if I swallow…’ several times, and when she does swallow, she experiences discomfort, and calls for her mom. The point of ‘Anticipate’ is that the instigator imposes upon you some sort of anticipated event that an instigation that you have already experienced from that instigator will and is happening again. So, in other words, even after you have addressed and made more tenable a certain instigation in the past or recent past, the instigator is still able to re-introduce that instigation. The anticipation, when it happens, may be very obvious. [The solution is to choose not to subscribe to that instigation, now that you know what it is. And to help with the ‘brunt’ of such an instigation, I recommend that you combine the use of bookmark ‘Argue’ from Wishlist #1017 with bookmark ‘Anticipate’, making it ‘Argue anticipate’. [Now that I have introduced to you ‘Argue anticipate’, I can now introduce to you another bookmark that more accurately explains this instigation effect. It’s called ‘Tolerate anticipate’. That is when an instigator impropely imposes upon you a false obligated sense to have a tolerance for such an anticipation. Let’s say we use the Chloraseptic commercial again, and the anticipation of ‘it will hurt if I swallow’ is introduced to you, except this time, when you use bookmark ‘Tolerate anticipate’, you choose instead to not need to tolerate such an experience. In other words, even though such an adversely misleading sense of composure response is introduced to you, you choose not to interact with the response in such a direct manner. You instead use a more acceptable, a more reasonable composure response.

[Well anyway, since I have to read over this entire list before it is finished, I have to stop typing now. Although this is something that you may expect, I’m presenting you this as a reassurance, that I plan to type in more ideas, the usual once a week. See you then!

Violence, viewer discretion for tv series ‘Stargate: Atlantis’ and ‘Magnum, P.I.’, violence and rated PG viewer discretion for movie ‘Willow’, violence and viewer discretion for tv series ‘The Blacklist’ and ‘Elementary’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Mistake overemphasizing mistake’, ‘Argue anticipate’, and ‘Tolerate anticipate’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

[I forgot to mention that, when I believed I got sick with the flu last week, I took the medicine ‘Theraflu’. The flu in America is very common, and if you didn’t get your flu shot, or you don’t plan on getting any flu shots, I recommend that you have some ‘Theraflu’ handy in case you catch the flu. I’m not a doctor. I’m just giving you a description because I believe the flu is very common in America, and you can just buy ‘Theraflu’ without needing a prescription from your doctor. Going back to the ‘Theraflu’, it’s in the form of a powder that comes in packs. Here is a question for this ‘Theraflu’ advice: ‘Why should I have ‘Theraflu’? Because, if you don’t get your yearly flu shot, and I am assuming that you can reasonably take a flu shot, and you catch the flu, there is a possibility that the experience won’t be just a minor nuisance. When I caught what I believed to be the flu several years ago, I could not sleep at all. That particular experience of the flu induced some sort of restless, insomnia like effect upon me, and my entire body felt like it was aching. Luckily, I finally was able to take the ‘Theraflu’ that night, and soon after, I was able to get some sleep. Now, when you use ‘Theraflu’, you just add 8 oz of hot water to one packet, and drink the result within 10-15 minutes. According to the box, you can take one dose every 4 hours. When I was sick with what I believed to be the flu, I think I only took 2 doses. [I recommend you buy the ‘Nighttime Severe Cold & Cough’ Theraflu. That is the one that will help you sleep better, if you caught the flu, and you’re staying at home to recover. I bought the ‘Theraflu’ from Amazon. And I think it’s every 2 years you are supposed to replace the ‘Theraflu’ you purchased with a new one. Check the expiration date on the ‘Theraflu’ box, if you decide to get the medicine.

12/2/2015

Pinch manage overcommit:

In the context of standard demographic advice, this idea, when I finish explaining the 1st part of it, may look like what I imagine a grammar school Physics problem may look like. So, to try and correct that, what I will do is make 2 lists. The 1st list will have 3 new concepts that I have discovered, and the 2nd list will contain it’s extrapolation. I plan to clarify further the understanding of this idea in the 2nd list. Also, another benefit of this technique is that, for those of you who want to make your own ideas without my solution, you may just look at the 1st list that I will make, the one that has the 3 ideas, and choose not to read the 2nd list. I am also typing this idea in this format in order for you to have this idea, if you choose to, before Christmas of this year. There is a better way of explaining it. I could explain ‘Pinch manage overcommit’ like I explained Wishlist #1015(The beginnings of bookmark use), but that would make me feel too cumbersomed/fatigued if I did so. In other words, the better way would cause me to explain the idea ‘from the beginning’ in order to avoid that Physics problem complexity, but I would feel too cumbersomed/fatigued if I did so. If I discovered this idea without Christmas being some sort of unofficial time limitation, I may have chosen to instead to start the explanation ‘from the beginning’.

Pinch manage overcommit:

1st, I’d like to start by explaining how I plan to explain this idea. I will try to describe these ideas in the form that I have originally discovered them, without adding what I have already discovered after completing the idea in my mind. That way, you may see how one idea leads into another.

Manage:

The 1st idea, which is the main idea, I will call ‘Manage’. I have discovered that an instigator may improperly impose upon you a sense of ‘task management’ interaction, even though you may have chosen to not interact with such an instigation. The best illustration example I can think of, although it may seem unrealistic, and of course it is refurbished for advice, starts according to Amazon Video, 1 hour 50 minutes and 33 seconds near end of movie ‘Spy(2015)’, when Aldo(Peter Serafinowicz) was explaining his real identity to Susan Cooper(Melissa McCarthy). The obvious highlight of the illustration is when Aldo tried to kiss Miss Cooper in a context that Miss Cooper did not like, and she pushed Aldo away. According to Amazon Video, the scene starts 1 hour, 51 minutes, and 3 seconds into movie. So, the point of the ‘Spy(2015)’ reference is that, even though she did not want to kiss Aldo in such a manner, she still interacted with an adversely altered sense of task management that was caused by Aldo’s uninvited attempted kiss. For example, Miss Cooper still pushed Aldo away, and still left the conversation feeling disgusted. So, to help you see the instigation identified by bookmark ‘Manage’, think of some mild to moderate instigations that you have experienced, the ones that you did not choose to interact with. Even though you chose not to participate in such instigations, you still may have been affected by the instigation’s imposed interaction of task management. Refurbished for advice, of course, using the movie ‘Spy(2015)’, you still pushed it away and left the situation feeling bothered somewhat. And so, while I was thinking about this instigation identified by bookmark ‘Manage’, I invented 2 more ideas to be a solution for it. The 2 ideas are called 1)’Strive’ and 2)’Equate’.

Strive:

What I am about to type in now is something that I just imagined to help you use idea ‘Strive’. Since I do not want to change your school of thought, I’m clarifying now that this is just an idea. You don’t have to subscribe to it, but maybe you may find it useful in order to use the ‘Strive’ idea. And so, here is the idea: I think it was a year or so ago that I imagined some companies allowing their employees, because of the nature of what they do, to have and participate in what I call an ‘instigation room’, where they can instigate each other, but in a context that is meant to be job related, and the instigations are not meant to have actual harmful consequences. And so, when I 1st imagined such an instigation room, I didn’t just imagined it’s existence. I remember passing through such a room, moving amongst the people practicing instigation, but using Tai chi. I wasn’t talking to any of them. I was just passing through.(To defend myself, I think I got this idea from episode 1.2 ‘A Leaf in the Wind’ from series ‘The Legend of Korra(2012)’. According to Amazon Video, the episode 1st aired on tv April 4, 2012. and according to Amazon Video, the reference starts 2 minutes and 20 seconds into the episode. In the reference, Jinora explains to Korra that the goal of the exercise is to weave her way through the gates and make it to the other side without touching them). Anyway, I probably thought of that idea sometime after watching that ‘Legend of Korra’ episode, which was probably over 2 years ago. When I was thinking about that ‘instigation room’, I imagined how the people in that room would make themselves aware of new people or people who would warrant an obvious change in their attitudes. It was a casual atmosphere, so when new people would walk in, they would just have a conversation about it. The point is that, based on that change in attitude, and of course I am just imagining this, I have recently made the logical deduction with a little extrapolation that instigators have the capability to cause innocent people to make mistakes. Now, I’m only addressing mistakes that are mild to moderate. For example, let’s say that a co-worker who could be an instigator wanted to make a point to another co-worker. The co-worker for some reason instigates the other co-worker, causing the co-worker to make a contemplation mistake that favors the point of the co-worker instigator.

Now, if you are a person who’s school of thought does not believe in such a thing, then of course you don’t have to use this idea directly. However, what if you are a person who has experienced an instigation, whether it’s from work or school, and the instigation caused you to make a mistake, and the effect was that you were moping around for a week or so before that mistake waned enough to no longer be bothersome?
Pfizer is the pharmaceutical drug firm that produces the particular medicine cialis professional cipla . The effects of healthy physical relationship can benefit to the patient and increases the risk of the development of drug-resistant bacteria and maintain the effectiveness of ZITHROMAX (azithromycin) and other antibacterial drugs, this drug should be taken around thirty to forty minutes before making love.Any increase in the dosage should be prescribed by the doctor so that no complications arise. http://icks.org/n/data/ijks/1482467798_add_file_2.pdf order cialis Be sure to check that each canadian cialis mastercard therapist can provide ample evidence of their training, experience and commitment to the team is off the charts. This medicine is also needed to viagra super make the energy level of body is a key feature of this herbal supplement is one of the natural ways to enhance libido in males is by regularly consuming herbal pills like Kamdeepak capsules.
This is my plan for both ‘Strive’ and ‘Equate’. The purpose of both ‘Strive’ and ‘Equate’ is to improve your sense of striving and equating. The extra sense of latitude created from such an improvement, if you choose to, could be used as part of the solution for instigation identified by bookmark ‘Manage’.

I shall start explanation ‘Strive’ using a refurbished for advice description of the story of Hippomenes found in www.wikipedia.com(Just type in name ‘Hippomenes’ in the wikipedia search engine). The part that I am using from that story is how the 3 golden apples given to Hippomenes by Aphrodite affected Atalanta. You see, while Hippomenes was in a race with Atalanta, Hippomenes would drop one at a time one of the golden apples that he has to the ground, and every single time Atalanta would see one of those apples, she would stop running to pick the apple up from the ground. The apple for this advice represents as an example only, not necessarily something that actually happened to you, the apple represents a mistake that you have experienced that was caused by an instigation, a mild to moderate mistake that may have caused you to mope around for a week or so  before that mistake waned enough to no longer be bothersome. One possible effect such a mistake may create is that your originally chosen sense of striving would be abandoned, replaced with another sense of striving. As an example, I just imagined being in a race with celebrity Wesley Snipes, based on his character Mr. Johnson from tv series ‘The Player(2015)’. Using respectful maturity, of course, and I just imagined it, let’s say in the path of our race are several table platforms, and I placed a golden apple from the same place that Aphrodite got her apples on one of those platforms. When Wesley Snipes saw that apple, he stopped running to look at it. Soon after seeing that apple, he discontinued the race altogether. You see, like Wesley Snipes in the story, for a moment, it is like you are just staring at that golden apple, and of course the apple represents that mild to moderate mistake caused by an instigation.

Now, let’s say that a minor mistake is unavoidable. If this ‘Strive’ idea works for you, you should be able, let’s start with just minor mistakes for now, you should be able to not only maintain the use of your originally chosen sense of striving, but you should also be able to manage better how you respond to your mistakes. To help you use the ‘Strive’ idea in the beginning, if you choose to, if you have experienced a minor mistake that is instigation or inadvertently related, put that mistake in a scene from movie ‘The Internship(2013)’. The primary scene according to Amazon Video is located 53 minutes and 53 seconds into the movie, when Graham(Max Minghella) caused Billy McMahon(Vince Vaughn) to fall during a game created by Google. For more detail, you can watch the examples where both Billy McMahon and Nick Campbell(Owen Wilson) are both still on the ground because of Graham. Now, based on those illustrations, put your mistake in an extrapolated illustration of Billy McMahan, while he is still on the ground, is using one of his hands and arms to reach up as he is looking up, a faltering created by Graham. Now, the reason I recommend that extrapolated illustration of Billy McMahan is because Mr. McMahan throughout the movie is regularly emphasizing to the other characters in the movie that he maintains a positive sense of striving. He even gives advice that promotes a positive use of striving. So, the hope of this advice is that, if you put your mild mistakes in that extrapolated illustration, even with the sense of your mistake induced by an instigation, you can still maintain your original sense of striving, a little like Billy McMahan does in the movie ‘The Internship(2013)’, or at least you can just use the idea for latitude.

Equate:

The original definition of ‘Equate’ that I had imagined was to maintain a chosen latitude allowance use for certain instigations that trouble you. I give that original definition credit for ‘starting the ball rolling’ so to speak. However, it’s effectiveness lasted I think it was only a few days for me. So, eventually, I upgraded it’s use to the definition of ‘remembering what your originally chosen intent and resolve was at the time of instigation, with elements of latitude allowance reference. Here’s an illustrated example, refurbished for advice, with the use of the solution in it. The example is in episode 2.26 ‘Assignment: Earth’ from series ‘Star Trek(1968)’. According to Amazon Video, the example is located 17 minutes and 18 seconds into the episode, when Gary Seven(Robert Lansing) asked Roberta Lincoln(Teri Garr) for a typed report for the past 3 days. The reason that the typed report is a possible solution is found in how people recall events. For example, and I don’t know if this is true for you, it’s just an example, when a person recalls an experience involving another person, when that person interprets such an experience, that person may use conceptualizations, contemplation articulations, basically evaluations for their own personal use. However, when a person has to type a report of that recalled experience, that person has to now take into consideration that another person will be reading that report. It’s not just something that they think to themselves privately. It’s now a depiction for another person to evaluate. When that person makes such a report, for that moment, that person may remember details of that experience that was not taken into consideration when that person was evaluating such an experience privately. Notice that, even though Miss Lincoln did not actually type in any words, her intent to type a report revealed to Gary Seven that he misunderstood Miss Lincoln’s true identity.

O.K., so that’s the sci-fi example. Here’s an example that I’ll try to offer to you to use directly. Let’s see if I can use only a little spark of light instead of a spotlight as a reference point. The only illustrated example I can think of is only available on DVD from Amazon that I know of. I don’t know where such an episode is available streaming. The reference is from episode 6.22 ‘Let’s Dance’ from series ‘Northern Exposure(1995)’. If memory serves, Marilyn Whirlwind(Elaine Miles) described to the others that her mother, Mrs. Whirlwind(Armenia Miles) was offended by Dr. Phil Capra’s(Paul Provenza) lack of manners during dinner. Of course, she also realized that Dr. Phil Capra does not know cotillion, and therefore did not know any better. Cotillion is a cultural knowhow used specifically in Cicely, Alaska. For further reference into ‘Let’s Dance’, I recommend web site

http://www.moosechick.com/mcnotes.html

The moosechick web site describes all of the ‘Northern Exposure’ episodes. Now, here’s an example, just an example, for you. Suppose while at work you were having some sort of situation rectified with another employee. Later, as you are reinterpreting the experience, you find yourself mildly offended by how that person rectified the situation with you. Let’s say it had some sort of imposed task management involved. Since you did not have the ‘Equate’ idea, you were still bothered by the experience. [Now, in the 2nd example, suppose the same situation occurred, but this time you now have available the ‘Equate’ idea. So, what happens is that, although you were offended by the experience, you eventually realized that, with the help of the ‘Equate’ idea, you can now remember that the situation was rectified while you were at work, and the offense wasn’t addressed until after you arrived home. As an example, not something that actually happened, you may say to yourself-‘How is the 2nd example different from the 1st?’ The difference is that, when you remember your intent and resolve at the time of the instigation or inadvertency, if there are any reinterpretations that may occur afterwards, your ability to know what latitude allowance you have given the situation could help you decide the relevance of those ‘after the fact’ reinterpretations. In the example I have given you, you resolved that situation in the job. That is what happened, and that helps remind you what latitude allowance you have given that situation. Later, when you were at home, you may have noticed something else, but you did not agree to knowingly include that reinterpretation when you originally interacted with that co-worker. Is it relevant? That is up to you to decide. However, in this example, once you realized that the reinterpretation was not in the original moment that happened in the job, you then chose to no longer pursue the contemplation in a serious context. You see? You are still in full control. I am not trying to change your school of thought, and with this new idea ‘Equate’, you may now better manage reinterpretations that instigations and inadvertencies may impose upon you.

Violence, rated R viewer discretion for movie ‘Spy(2015)’, violence and viewer discretion for TV animated series ‘The Legend of Korra’, reading discretion for Greek mythology references, violence and viewer discretion for tv series ‘The Player(2015)’, violence and rated PG-13 viewer discretion for movie ‘The Internship’, violence and viewer discretion for tv series ‘Star Trek(1966+)’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie.(For example, in movie ‘The Internship’, don’t use the fight scene involving the man in the wheelchair, and that scene when Billy and Nick decided to take everyone out to go to a party, that whole party scene, don’t use that, too. Those scenes, although they may be entertaining for many adults to watch, are not needed for the advice). [Use mental bookmarks ‘Manage’, ‘Strive’, and ‘Equate’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

11/25/2015

Sound bytes:

I have a few ideas that I won’t make a separate list for, simply because there’s not much to say about them individually. However, I’ve decided to put them together in one list and call them ‘Sound bytes’. I think I got that name from a magazine that talked about computer related issues I read years ago. I don’t recall the name of that magazine. Besides their brevity, another thing in common these ‘sound bytes’ have is that they all are created based on their tv show or movie references. Basically, it may be said that their tv show or movie references are them, with some advice related refurbishing involved, of course. The 3rd thing in common that these ‘sound bytes’ have is that all of these ‘sound bytes’ are used by me to make more ideas. For example, if you have your own web site or blog, there are tools provided to you from the web site or blog that you may use to add more information or upgrade your web site or blog that are provided by the web site or blog. One recommendation that I offer you is that you use these ‘sound bytes’ to help you make more ideas, for example, like the way you would add more information to your web site or blog, said in relation to advice, of course. How to use these ‘sound bytes’ will be more clear as I explain them. [And finally, the reason I am typing these ‘sound bytes’ now is because of the next idea I plan to type in. Hopefully, I will start that next idea today, if I am able to finish explaining these ‘sound bytes’ ideas today. Oversimplifyingly said, the next idea I believe is kind of serious in such a way that I believe it’s in your best interest if you have some sort of other useful idea before that useful idea is explained.

Point taken:

In my opinion, I believe ‘Point taken’ is the best ‘sound byte’ idea I have to offer you. Of course, there are other schools of thought that may not agree with my opinion. I just thought that such a stated fact may be useful to you. According to Amazon Video, the ‘sound byte’ reference is located 27 minutes and 50 seconds into episode 3.2 ‘The Ensigns of Command’ from series ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation(1989)’. Here is a quote:

Deanna Troi(Marina Sirtis):-‘We conceptualize the universe in relatively the same way.’

Captain Picard(Patrick Stewart):-‘Point taken.’

In relation to advice said, I recommend you watch the rest of that conversation between Troi and Picard for further context, of you choose to. Now, when you imagine Picard saying the words ‘Point taken.’, that is when you are making certain ideas in your head that you may choose to put in the form of a conversation you are having with someone. For example, you may imagine one of your teachers, a co-worker, or your boss giving you some sort of advice or constructive criticism that you may need to practice experiencing. You may want to give that person a proper response, so when you imagine that person talking to you, and you just need to imagine the conversation itself only, not who they actually are, and that person is done talking to you, you then collect yourself to see if you have listened to them, whatever a proper response may be to you, and then when you are ready, you say the words in your head only quote-‘Point taken.’

Here’s a question for the advice:-‘Why imagine it?’ Recommended answer: The expectations of others may not always align with your own expectations. You may think of situations where the use of ‘Point taken’ may be useful to you, even though such situations may never actually occur. Also, ‘Point taken’ may be used just as part of an idea, and may not have an actual identity of a conversation.

Face value:

This ‘sound byte’ reference according to Amazon Video is located 11 minutes and 8 seconds into episode 3.1 ‘Laws of Nature’ from series ‘Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.(2015)’. Here’s a quote:

Phil Coulson(Clark Gregg):-‘I’ll take it to her myself. I wouldn’t want you to do anything that makes you feel uncomfortable.(Keep in mind that tv show ‘Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.’ is science fiction. This is the moment when Coulson takes off his robot hand.)

Lance Hunter(Nick Blood):-‘Yea, I know that sarcasm, and I’m choosing to accept your thoughtfulness at face value.’

Basically, as a recommended evaluation to use, when a person portrays something, let’s say in a conversation, those singular portrayals are not the only portrayals involved in that person’s livelihood. In the ‘Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.’ example, Coulson presented to Hunter 2 obvious portrayal examples. One of the portrayals is identified by his actual words:-‘I wouldn’t want you to do anything that makes you feel uncomfortable.’, and the other portrayal was when Coulson removed his robot hand, a portrayal that I am guessing is designed to give Hunter a comparison to Hunter’s use of reservation. Hunter identified the removal of Coulson’s robot arm example as sarcasm, and chose to give ‘face value’ credibility to the actual words that Coulson said to him, and that Hunter interprets Coulson’s words as being thoughtful.

purchase viagra online That in turn lowers the blood pressure. But it is a fact that suicide is a temporary solution for a permanent soft viagra tabs problem. Once PDE5 is inhibited, the action of cGMP is required given it results in smooth muscle mass relaxation in the intimal cushions within the helicine through the entire process of vasodilation. generic sildenafil The only difference between the two purchase viagra no prescription is the price. So, why is ‘face value’ important? It’s just another idea to help you make more ideas. You may also use it for added clarification when you consider talking to certain people. For example, certain portrayals that you may notice people presenting, maybe those portrayals shouldn’t be used in the context of certain actively used circumstances. After all, even though I am assuming most people have private lives, you still use the same body and brain to exist in those private lives, and your body (and use of brain) are still presented to other people, for both public and private circumstances. In other words, even though I may see many people going to work in a public transportation area, those many people also have private lives that is none of my business to comment on, even though they are using the same bodies as they publicly go to work for their private lives! To avoid some ambiguity, there’s that movie ‘New in Town(2009)’, the reasons why Lucy Hill(Renee Zellweger) was leaving Minnesota crying. Some of the townspeople were clearly embittering how Lucy Hill interpreted the portrayals presented to her by the townpeople that wanted her to leave. In other words, certain portrayals presented to Lucy Hill were designed to cause Lucy HIll to leave town, and the reasons Lucy Hill eventually chose to stay is an example that people are more than just the portrayals they present. However, it is the initial ‘face value’ of certain townspeople in the beginnings of the movie that did cause Lucy Hill to leave town crying. I hope that ‘New in Town’ explanation was helpful.

Resistance:

For the use of sound byte ‘Resistance’, it is my belief that the actual words that I type in are what kids are using to be skeptical with. If that is true for you, then I recommend you have 2 forms of skepticism to use, 1 for what I type in now, and 1 that takes into consideration the next list I type in. Of course, you don’t have to do that. I’m not asking you to compromise anything. It’s just that the use of ‘resistance’ as a concept will be addressed better in the next list. Right now, I’m just giving you 2 examples of ‘Resistance’ that you may find useful.

The 1st example comes from movies ‘Superman II(1980)’ and ‘Superman III(1983)’, starring Christopher Reeve as Superman. Basically, you’re imagining looking at Superman blocking a white beam of energy with his right hand. When you see Superman, his right arm is outstretched. You can also clearly see that letter ‘S’ on his shirt, and as the brightness of the white light from the beam gradually expands, like way a dimmer light switch controls the brightness of a white light bulb, you see Superman’s face show his teeth as he is resisting the energy beam. The white energy beam is coming from the left to the right according to your vantage point as Superman is using his right hand to ‘resist’ the beam coming from the left. Superman’s arm is outstretched as he is blocking the beam. [Of course, the examples will help clarify how that looks. According to Amazon Video, the rental of ‘Superman II’ shows the reference at 1 hour, 48 minutes, and 12 seconds, when General Zod(Terence Stamp) said quote-‘We must combine our strength!’. Soon after saying that, that’s when Zod, Ursa(Sarah Douglas), and Non(Jack O’Halloran) were at the same time zapping a beam of white energy at Superman. When that was happening, Superman’s right arm was outstretched as he was using his right hand to ‘resist’ 3 white energy beams at the same time. [The 2nd example, according to Amazon Video, starts 1 hour, 50 minutes, and 35 seconds into movie rental ‘Superman III(1983)’, when Superman(Christopher Reeve) again blocks a beam of energy using his outstretched right arm and right hand.

So, here’s a question for sound byte ‘Resistance’: ‘Why should I imagine Superman blocking a beam of energy?’ If you choose to, you may find that, while making certain ideas, a sense of resistance may be useful to you, so what you may choose to do is imagine Superman blocking a beam of energy. You may choose a portrayal of Superman from actor Christopher Reeve from the movie, or you can choose another actor. I recommend actor Henry Cavill, who portrays Superman in movie ‘Man of Steel(2013)’. Since there are a lot of convenient illustrations of Cavill portraying Superman in that movie, it should be easy for you to imagine Mr. Cavill’s portrayal of Superman blocking the energy beam.

For the sake of variety, I offer you a 2nd illustrated example of ‘Resistance’. This example is based not just on movies, but also on certain specific participations the actor has in real life. Refurbished with inapproprieities removed for advice, of course, the illustrated example is Conan from movies ‘Conan the Barbarian(1982)’ and ‘Conan the Destroyer(1984)’, the main character Conan portrayed by Arnold Schwarzenegger, participating in ‘tug of war’ with 4 or 5 people from your job. According to web site wikipedia.com, ‘tug of war’ is a sport that directly puts two or more teams against each other in a test of strength: teams pull on opposite ends of a rope, with the goal being to bring the rope a certain distance in one direction against the force of the opposing team’s pull. In the web site, there are several pictures of people playing ‘tug of war’. The reason I chose Arnold Schwarzenegger as Conan is also because, according to wikipedia, Schwarzenegger was a popular bodybuilder(for example, his movie ‘Pumping Iron(1977)’, and he was Governor of California. So, if you put those 3 things together, you may get a convenient Conan to imagine participating in ‘tug of war’ with several workers from your job. When I do it, from my vantage point, I see Conan to the left pulling the rope, and from the right side of the rope, 4 or so people wearing suits, a mix of men and women, are pulling the rope. Since Conan is a human being, as compared to Superman, when you zoom in on him, you can imagine seeing his muscles strain as he pulls on the rope, and if you choose to, you can hear him groan, from the resistance he is using pulling that rope. He is also sweating.

Since this may be the 1st time you have used such ideas, before you judge it now, I recommend you reserve a more serious judgement of the use of these 2 ‘Resistance’ ideas until you are actually in a situation that you may choose to believe that such ideas are useful for you to use, or maybe even needed for you to use. When that happens, then you may notice more how Superman blocking a beam or Conan pulling a rope may be useful to you. For example, if you are an adult at work, there may be moments where 2 such men used as a ‘sound byte’ may prove useful for you to imagine, within reason, of course. [Of course, I also try to take into consideration kids reading these ideas. The ‘Superman’ idea should be easy enough to imagine. As for the ‘Conan’ idea, well, it’s just that the ‘Conan’ idea takes into consideration employment situations. Said to the kids, so to speak, if you had such a job, and if you were an adult, you would probably understand. If it’s any consolation(comfort, solace), I am an adult, and I use the ‘Superman’ example more. [I forgot to mention that both the ‘Superman’ and ‘Conan’ examples are conceptualizations of resistance that are supposed to be in your favor. You can, of course, change that default use, within reason, if you choose to.

Layered evaluations:

Based on what I have already typed in, for example, I explained ‘Shuffling bookmarks’ in a previous list in this blog called ‘The beginnings of bookmark use’. If you are using bookmarks, and this is just an example, not that you are actually doing this, according to ‘Shuffling bookmarks’, you would take a bunch of phrases and you would ‘shuffle’ them contemplationally, so that you would only need to use just one phrase, one bookmark, to use for a specific experience of instigation. If you started off with 10 phrases, for example, after you have shuffled them, you would no longer need to use any of those phrases as a direct bookmark to reference, since you know what all of those 10 phrases are. After you have shuffled them to make yourself familiar to them, you can then choose a phrase that can, let’s say, identify the brunt of the instigation that is bothering you, and lessen it’s effect with it. That is just one example.

After shuffling bookmarks for a while, now and then, perhaps only a few times a month, you may encounter an instigation that, even though you also shuffle bookmarks, the instigation may still require for you to identify certain particulars of that instigation using separate evaluations. I call such a situation ‘Layered evaluations’. For example, you may experience an instigation that requires several separate evaluations that are consecutive to each other, like you are describing the different stages of a project. Like I said, you may encounter such an instigation only a few times a month, if you experience any instigation at all.

Now, there are 3 basic examples that I use to help me interpret layered evaluations, each example may offer you a unique perspective to help you interpret such evaluations. If memory serves, the 1st one that I started to use, according to Amazon Video, starts 1 hour, 35 minutes, and  4 seconds near end of movie ‘Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan(1982)’, when the Enterprise is escaping the explosion caused by Khan(Ricardo Montalban). As the Enterprise is escaping the explosion, you see the impression of rings following the Enterprise. I refurbished that scene and used the rings as representations for different layered evaluations. The 1st ring is the 1st layer, the 2nd ring is the 2nd layer, the 3rd ring is the 3rd layer.

The 2nd example, according to Amazon Video, is located 33 minutes and 20 seconds into movie ‘Escape from the Planet of the Apes(1971)’, when Dr. Otto Hasslein(Eric Braeden) starts to explain how ‘infinite regression’ works. I’m only using the illustration of a picture within a picture within a picture part of the explanation. Technically, refubished for advice, you simply select a limited amount of pictures within a picture, let’s say you select 4 pictures. After you have done that, each ‘picture’ that you have pre-selected can be used as a reference for a layered evaluation. As Dr. Hasslein is explaining ‘infinite regression’, there is an illustrated example in the movie where there is only 4 pictures in the illustration, making it easy for you to use the movie reference.

The 3rd example is from the illustrations of Russian nesting dolls. According to www.wikipedia.com, Russian nesting dolls, also called ‘Matryoshka dolls’ according to wikipedia.com, refers to a set of wooden dolls of decreasing size placed one inside another. There are illustrations of Russian nesting dolls in web site wikipedia.com. Although the primary reference, if memory serves, is located in one of those earlier ‘Nikita(2010)’ episodes starring Maggie Q as Nikita, I could not find which specific episode where the nesting dolls were illustrated. I used search engine google.com, but I still could not find it. Therefore, the only example I can offer you for this advice that has a Russian nesting doll reference, according to Amazon Video, starts 13 minutes and 36 seconds into movie ‘The Watch(2012)’, when Bob(Vince Vaughn) is discovering for the 1st time what a Russian nesting doll is. Bob illustrates that there is a smaller doll within a bigger doll, and so on and so forth. Of course, you only use that reference with Bob discovering the nesting dolls, that reference is refurbished for advice, and you ‘throw away’ the rest of the movie.(I was hoping that I could offer you the ‘Nikita’ reference, because of it’s cool, serious ambiance. Instead, you have just the comedy illustration of what a Russian nesting doll is. My apologies). [So, how do you use a Russian nesting doll for layered evaluations? One example is that you imagine using the 1st nesting doll, let’s say that’s the biggest nesting doll, as the 1st layered evaluation reference. The 2nd nesting doll, the smaller doll inside the larger one, is the 2nd layered evaluation reference, and so on. The Russian nesting doll example is probably easy enough to imagine, especially with the help of Bob from movie ‘The Watch’. So, for example, if you experience an instigation that has 3 layers of evaluation, you can call that ‘3 nesting dolls’.

Violence, viewer discretion for tv series ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation’ and ‘Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.’. Rated PG for movie ‘New in Town’. Violence and rated PG viewer discretion for movies ‘Superman II’ and ‘Superman III’. Violence and rated PG-13 viewer discretion for movie ‘Man of Steel’. Violence and viewer discretion for movies ‘Conan the Barbarian’ and ‘Conan the Destroyer’. Violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan’. Violence and viewer discretion for movie ‘Escape from the Planet of the Apes’. Violence and rated R viewer discretion for movie ‘The Watch’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Point taken’, ‘Face value’, ‘Resistance’, and ‘Layered evaluations’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

11/18/2015

Not good enough:

I’d like to start this idea with a reference from Greek mythology concerning Apollo, the son of Zeus. As punishment, according to the internet, Zeus exiled Apollo to live and work on Earth as a mortal for one year. His assignment was to assist King Admetus, a kind and pious man who treated Apollo well.

From that reference, it is my opinion that, in the context of interpreting Greek mythology, that Apollo learned the valuable lesson of humility. Now that it’s 2015, I speculate that the kids who are attending American schools have an incorporated sense of humility in such a way that it is not seen as something as obvious as Apollo working on Earth for one year, but rather that sense does not even seem to be needed to be recognizable, like it is not even there. Anyway, what I am trying to say is that, even though it is possible that people may believe that a lack of adequate humility could be the problem for certain issues, this idea identifies an instigation where the problem is not humility, but rather a notion identified by bookmark ‘Not good enough’, and I offer you the best reference I can think of that identifies such a problem.  According to Amazon Video, the reference begins 3 minutes and 13 seconds into episode 4.9 ‘Final Mission’ from series ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation(1990)’. Captain Dirgo(Nick Tate) quote:

Captain Dirgo:-‘Captain Picard. Captain Dirgo of the shuttlecraft Nenebek.

Captain Picard(Patrick Stewart):-‘Ah, Captain. It’s good to meet you.’

Ensign Wesley Crusher(Wil Weaton):-‘Captain? Of a mining shuttle?’

Captain Dirgo:-‘Yes, Ensign. Captain. My ship isn’t pretty, she isn’t big, but we’ve logged almost 10 thousand hours together.
These days, the men buy Kamagra to keep things alive in their relationship. deeprootsmag.org tadalafil soft Vardenafil like any other drug can cause complications like cardiac arrest, blood pressure problem and asthma attack. price levitra generic Side Effects Thus, ed pills is safe for utilization only by physically fit adult men. Yes, there is no dearth cialis for order of couples who flaunt their good looks, dress nicely and enjoy a secure ordering process. Or, it can be said that intercourse is so easy, and it does not take much to get a good (or bad) reputation based on you viagra without prescription online communications capabilities.
Captain Picard:-‘Oh yes, she seems a very…a very sturdy craft.’

Here is how I describe the instigation identified by bookmark ‘Not good enough’: Certain various mild to moderate instigations that you may experience may give you the impression that you’re ‘not good enough’ for something, but the real target is for such instigations to adversely manipulate how you respond to certain notions that do not meet up to the expectations of other, fortified notions. For example, when Dirgo addressed himself as Captain Dirgo of a shuttlecraft to Picard, Wesley Crusher said quote-‘Captain? Of a mining shuttle?’ Clearly, Wesley was comparing Captain Dirgo’s shuttlecraft to the Enterprise. Of course, one solution example is how Picard communicated with Dirgo. Watching the reference for that one type of solution example is recommended.

Here’s an extrapolated example that I just imagined for this advice. Let’s say an adult man has been experiencing certain mild to moderate instigations ever since he was a teenager, instigations that gave him the impression that he was ‘not good enough’ for something. Now that he’s an adult, let’s say in his 30’s, in this example, he is talking to one of his friends, a woman that he met in the company that he works for, and she introduces something along the lines of that ‘Star Trek’ reference that I have introduced to you, extrapolated for this advice, of course, let’s say it is about some sort of project participation that she believes in, and then she says to the man quote-‘Why, not good enough for you?’, and the man who was manipulated by years of instigation, replies in a context that basically says that the expectations of his subscribed notions have better results when compared to her presented notions. He uses humility to emphasize the point, but like Wesley, his response seems to be apathetic(indifferent or unresponsive) as compared to how she treats the project.

Now, I’m not discouraging people from having certain acceptable project motivations. What I am saying is that all those ‘not good enough’ instigations caused such a man to be too indifferent, too apathetic, upon how others treat certain projects that are presented to him to be aware of.

Now, let’s say you use this advice, you try to be a little like Picard in the ‘Star Trek’ episode, and you still believe you got it wrong. My question is ‘How did you get it wrong?’ Even though the results of your intentions were not accurate, the content of your intentions in the context of this advice shows that you are no longer being manipulated by your past experiences with such ‘not good enough’ instigations with the same intensity. In fact, since I just discovered ‘Not good enough’ recently, but based on my experiences with the idea, you may experience a certain relief when you recall certain mild to moderate instigations that you already have experienced, when you use the ‘Not good enough’ bookmark on them. Of course, I am assuming that you are also using the ‘Overlapping’ bookmark that I have recommended for you to use in a previous list in this blog.

[Violence, viewer discretion for series ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation’. Some discretion for the Apollo Greek mythology reference. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode and series. [Use mental bookmark ‘Not good enough’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

[I was going to start explaining another idea today, but I had to eventually go to the Department of Motor Vehicles, which I did today, and so instead I offered you one of my new ideas. However, next week, I plan to type in 2 lists.

11/4/2015

Before I begin, I would like to recommend an expectation for reading this advice. For those of you who read Wishlist #1017, this advice is like that, so to speak. I speculate that, for many of you who read it, the best part of that advice was when I explained ‘Shock complain reciprocate’. If you look at your copy of the idea, or at the blog, you will notice that ‘Shock complain reciprocate’ was created at 10/1/2015. I typed that last part in the morning after I thought I finished explaining the idea, something I rarely do nowadays. I also imagined a boy explaining Wishlist #1017 to someone, saying that quote-

‘It was really good at first, but then it got really stupid at the end.’

Of course, the reason I imagined the boy explaining Wishlist #1017 was because of what I imagine the list to be it’s phenomenal success. You see, I speculate that the word ‘argue’ from that last part of that list is probably called one of the best ideas that I have ever made, even though it may seem to others that I have invented the idea by accident. Well anyway, the point of this speculation is not to brag about bookmark ‘Argue’, but just to recommend to you what type of expectation you may want to use to read this advice. I recommend you use the expectation that I speculate you have learned by reading Wishlist #1017. Basically, when I would recall Wishlist #1017, I see it as 5 words: 1)reciprocate, 2)attention, 3)surprise, 4)shock, and 5)argue. Since I am here, as an imagined exercise, I recommend that you imagine using those 5 words as if you are in a specific moment in episode 1.6 ‘Eggheads’ from series ‘Sliders(1995)’. According to Amazon Video, the reference recommended is located 39 minutes and 42 seconds into the episode, when Quinn Mallory(Jerry O’ Connell) is playing a sport called ‘Mindgame’. Within reason and refurbished for advice, of course, just imagine doing what Quinn did, but instead of answering the question ‘What is pi to 13 places?’, you use the 5 words as the answer in the context of ‘Mindgame’. In other words, you are running around like Quinn, but you are giving the 5 words as the answer: 1)reciprocate, 2)attention, 3)surprise, 4)shock, and 5)argue.

Well anyway, here is the example of what type of expectation I am recommending for you to use for this idea: It has been over a month now since you may have started using the ‘Argue’ bookmark, but even though it may seem like your use of the word ‘Argue’ is just the explanation I gave you for ‘Argue’, you imagined/speculated that, if all I did was give you the definition of the word ‘Argue’, then you would not use the word ‘Argue’ at all(This deduction is just from your 1st thoughts. You know what you mean). You then made the logical deduction that the effectiveness of the word ‘Argue’ was from the entire explanation from Wishlist #1017, even though you may not use the other parts of the explanation at all. [So, what I am trying to say is that, even though the beginnings of this advice may not WOW you in the beginning, after you read the whole thing, so to speak, you may be logically surprised as to what you may eventually find valuable in it.

Brace:

Before I begin the explanation, I recommend that, if you choose to use this advice, you try to remember what you were like before the use of this advice. For the kids who read this advice, whether or not you have one, I do not expect you to have an obvious technique that you can call upon to remember distress, like the way you may anticipate watching a new movie. However, for the adults, I recommend that you try to remember what you were like before this advice, if you choose to use it. All right, here it is: I’d like to start by identifying an instigation you may not be aware of that I call ‘Brace’. That is when an instigator tries to improperly impose an overemphasized non preferred sense of bracing upon you to obligate to. The best example I can think of right now in my opinion for ‘bracing’, not the bookmark ‘Brace’, is from movie ‘Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan(1982)’. For the Amazon Video reference, I am using The Director’s Cut version of the ‘Khan’ movie. The reference is located 51 minutes and 40 seconds into the movie, when Khan sent a photon torpedo at the Enterprise, and Kirk said quote-‘Hang on!’ to help the crew brace for impact. Of course, there are all sorts of varieties of bracing that an instigator may improperly impose upon you. The one I am referring to for this advice is from a bookmark I call ‘Up curve justification’. Basically, the bracing the instigator may impose upon you for this example is a bracing from your composure that, not only will you be aware of it, but you will have the option to declare what it is to others. That is what the instigator is counting on, because when you experience an instigation that uses ‘bracing’ in this manner, the response that you have probably may have given in the past to the instigator is like, without actual words of course, it’s like you are trying to show them as a clarification that you have been offended in some sort of way. Right at that moment, you are trying to show the instigator that you have experienced some sort of indiscretion. (Now, this is just the 1st part of this advice, so I recommend that you reserve your final judgment until you see the rest of the advice.) Now, if you have read the composure idea(Wishlist #1003-1008), which is located at the beginnings of this blog, then I believe you may have the ability to productively consider this: Adults who experience some sort of employment related transition may experience some misunderstandings during such a transition. Of course, the company probably issued some sort of explanation and courtesy to help with the transition, but there still may be some misunderstandings as employees interact with each other, let’s say several different categories of employees are learning to interact with each other. [Now, this ‘bracing’ instigation, in my opinion, could discourage you from transitioning with the new company situation. I mean, look at how you are responding: Even though it is clearly the instigator’s fault, your presentation of declaration, just by how it looks, and the seriousness involved, in my opinion, can inhibit your ability to transition to the company’s new policy. In other words, you are in the right to have a reason to respond to such an instigation, but the manner in which you choose to respond to such an instigation, the declaring appearance that you have been wronged, in my opinion, that is one way how the instigator wants you to respond, because such a response can inhibit your ability to transition to a new situation.

Now, the solution that I recommend is that, with your composure idea, you have the ability to decide what your chosen composure is, so when the instigator imposes a bracing experience that gives you the justified right to declare that you have experienced some sort of indiscretion, you can make a contemplation note of it, but instead of presenting an obvious declaration that you have been offended, you can instead present a more reasonable composure response. The point of this 1st ‘bracing’ idea is that you have the ability to transition to new situations, even though you may experience certain mild to moderate instigations that encourage your sense of bracing to feel justified to declare itself.

Jittery understand:

[Recently, I just accessed from Amazon Video the movie ‘The Chronicles of Riddick’. 40 minutes and 46 seconds into the movie, when Riddick(Vin Diesel) was captured by the mercenaries, Toombs(Nick Chinlund) said to the other mercenaries quote-

‘Maybe we should think about upping our game here a little bit.’

That brings us to the next bookmark I want to introduce you called ‘Jittery understand’. To help you remember the word ‘Jittery’, I recommend a word association to music video ‘Wake Me Up Before You Go Go’ by the English duo ‘Wham!(1984)’. According to youtube.com, the video has been watched over 57 million times. The phrase ‘The Jitterbug’ is repeated 4 times at the beginning of the music video. Now, the quote-‘Maybe we should think about upping our game here a little bit.’ from the ‘Riddick’ movie is used to identify that the instigator could make the instigation worse, which is why that ‘brace’ idea was only the 1st part of this explanation.

[I can continue typing for an hour or so, but I have some tv shows in the Tivo? player I would want to go through. Plus, even though I have an idea of what ‘Jittery understand’ means, since I did invent it, I think another week to think about it may give me a better explanation. In case you want to know, I invented ‘Jittery understand’ relatively recently, a week or so ago. After I explain ‘Jittery understand’, the 3rd bookmark that I plan to explain that is part of this idea is called ‘Justify subside’, and the 4th bookmark is called ‘Reciprocate argue’. So, as of now, this list when finished will have 4 bookmarks: 1)’Brace’, 2)’Jittery understand’, 3)’Justify subside’, and 4)’Reciprocate argue’. I plan to finish explaining this idea next week.
The bigger the order greater will be the better usually in stock cheap cialis solution of it. https://www.unica-web.com/archive/2011/jeunesse2011.html levitra on line But it is not a cheap medicine. It truly is a strategy for men that are harrowed by erection dysfunction by which they super viagra uk can share with colleagues around the world. Take in of generic viagra cipla http://www.unica-web.com/2014-images/GA-2014-report-of-auditors.pdf should be regarded only with the talk to of a doctor or health reputable.
11/11/2015

Sour subside:

I planned today to explain bookmark ‘Jittery understand’, but if I did so, to me, so to speak,> the effort may drain the living attention span out of me, so to speak(I’m trying to indicate that ‘so to speak’ is for the phrase ‘the effort may drain the living attention span out of me’). And so, what I plan to do to finish this list is just obligate myself to explain bookmark ‘Justify subside’, and if I choose to do more, I’ll try to do it in the next list or a future list.

I invented bookmark ‘Justify subside’ from episode 7.4 ‘Taxed’ from series ‘The Good Wife(2015)’, from the examples of Maia Sachs(Marsha Stephanie Blake). For example, according to Amazon Video, this reference starts 11 minutes and 14 seconds into the episode, when Alicia(Julianna Margulies) is making a plea recommendation to Maia, and here’s the quote:

Alicia-‘The prosecution is willing to take it down to six months probation, but you’ll need to plead guilty.’

Maia-‘But all I did was return a sweater. This is…I’m not admitting to anything.’

The generalistic moment for this advice is Maia’s declarations of being innocent, and that she will not plea as if she was guilty. There are several examples of that in the episode. However, the highlighted moment was during the quote I offered you, soon after Maia said ‘This is…’ It is her articulation of body language that is declaring her defiance, that she will not take a guilty plea because she believes she is innocent, a highly recommended reference for this advice.

And so, here is the definition of the instigation: An instigator may improperly impose a justified, declaring, resisting identity of justification as the identity of the instigation the instigator would want you to experience. [Maia’s example is the best example I can think of that illustrates a person experiencing a justified, declaring, resisting identity. Now, if I extrapolate Maia’s situation into a context of a mild to moderate instigation, I see another person who experienced an instigation, and the instigation’s identity is being maintained by the innocent person’s sense of justification use! The innocent person experienced an instigation that is resisting, declaring, and defiant, just like the characteristics Maia is using, except that the person is not showing such characteristics in an obvious sense, but rather is using such characteristics contemplationally to interpret the instigator’s imposition. So, for example, let’s say that innocent person is a woman, and that woman experienced such an instigation. Even though the woman won’t be obvious like Maia, that woman will still use contemplation characteristics of declaring, resisting, and defiance in a justified sense. The identity of the instigation would be mildly bothersome in that woman’s mind.

The solution I have originally invented for instigation identifed by bookmark ‘Justify subside’ is to allow your sense of justified identity to subside from the experience. This is not about changing your school of thought. Once you identifed the instigation, you know or you feel that you have been treated unacceptably. From there, instead of maintaining such a declaring, resisting, and defying identity, like the instigator wants you to , if that is the instigation you are experiencing, you can still have the justified identity, but if you choose to use this advice, you don’t need to maintain it’s interactive angst(a feeling of dread, anxiety, or anguish) when you think about it. Since you already know what it is, you can instead subside from it.

As I invented this idea, I treated the subsiding of such an experience as the answer. However, soon after using this idea, I discovered that, instead of just subsiding as a possible solution, you can instead change the actual subsiding that you are using when experiencing such an instigation. Here is an example I believe adults who have had kids have experience with, the meaning, not the exact content: The reference is in movie ‘Price Check(2012)’. According to Amazon Video, refurbished for advice, of course, the scene starts 1 hour, 13 minutes, and 5 seconds into the episode, when Henry Cozy(Finn Donoghue), who was only a few years old according to imdb.com, woke up Susan Felders(Parker Posey) while she was sleeping on the couch. Henry looked like he yelled a groul sound at her. She woke up, said a phrase induced by being startled(a phrase you can change), and then she calmly placed her hand on young Henry’s shoulder and said calmly quote-‘Don’t do that.’ So, is that an example of a person changing her use of subsiding, or what? So, when you reasonably extrapolate from the ‘Price Check’ example, if you experience an instigation identified by bookmark ‘Justify subside’, instead of the subsiding improperly encouraged by the instigation, it may be possible to choose a different sense of subsiding altogether. For example, even though Susan Felders from the ‘Price Check’ example didn’t directly interact with the subsiding introduced by young Henry, she clearly did not ignore it. She responded to it, used a different subsiding, and calmly interacted with Henry’s subsiding. The ‘Price Check’ reference is highly recommended.

‘Justify subside’ is an understanding bookmark. For your convenience, I want you to have a form of the bookmark that you could actually use more, so a variation of ‘Justify subside’ I recommend for you to use is called ‘Sour subside’. The word ‘Sour’ is used to help you quantify such an experience using intensity and taste. The only example I have time to give you right now for the use of bookmark ‘Sour subside’ is from movie ‘Another Cinderella Story(2008)’. According to Amazon Video, the example starts 47 minutes and 51 seconds into the movie, when Mary Santiago’s(Selena Gomez) step sisters played a short video where Mary when she was younger made a video of herself for Joey Parker(Drew Seeley) to see, and they played the video during a party, many of the people in the party laughed at it, and Mary said quote-‘This can’t be happening!’ to emphasize her embarrassment, and then she left the party. To be clear, I believe the video induced a sour experience for Mary Santiago to experience. The great thing about this example is that it is highly illustrated. Fans of celebrity Selena Gomez will probably easily relate to the reference in the movie’s context.

[Violence, viewer discretion for sci-fi series ‘Sliders’, violence and viewer discretion for movies ‘Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan’ and ‘The Chronicles of Riddick’, rated PG viewer discretion for movie ‘Another Cinderella Story’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Brace’ and ‘Sour subside’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.