10/27/2015

Relegate complain:

I have a concern about how some of the kids who read Wishlist #1021, about how I tried to explain within reason my 1st thought involving bookmark ‘Volunteer argue’. Here is the quote:

I considered the possibility that, for employees who were not in management, there were many possible job related considerations that non managerial employees may think of that were either difficult to impossible to have a viable use, in regards to it’s associated job related projects. Such considerations simply lacked a certain managerial knowhow. However, even though some people make such considerations that don’t work, there is a consideration that does have coinciding value with management, and that consideration is called ‘volunteering’. (According to web site dictionary.com, ‘volunteer’ means-‘a person who voluntarily offers himself or herself for a service or undertaking’). From the perspective of management, when an employee volunteers, it is like the co-worker is a pinata filled with many possibilities(for the definition of ‘Pinata’, I recommend you use www.wikipedia.com). (Of course, the co-worker is not an actual pinata filled with stuff. The ‘pinata’ example is just conceptualized.)

Have you ever heard of the phrase ‘oil and water don’t mix?’ Well, this is my explanation as to why some of the kids complained about that ‘volunteer 1st thought’ explanation. I’ll make the story about a boy who is reading these ideas, and then you may extrapolate from that story: Let’s say that this boy either has his own blog in the internet, or he has his own account in one of those more restricted intranets. For example, I’m assuming by now that all certified colleges in America have their own separate intranets. Part of what he does in his blog? is give advice, similar to what I type in the blog I am using. He is participating with other kids in making advice, and he is still relatively new at doing so. For example, sometimes he would want to change what he had typed in his blog while he was going to school, and would want to go back home to change it. The ‘wanting to change something in my blog’ to me is an inclination that he is learning that his 1st thoughts need to be changed in order to accomodate those that may be reading his blog. And so, when he read my ‘1st thought volunteering’ example, the example was a validation of the 1st thought efforts he has made in his own blog.

Now, the ‘oil and water don’t mix’ phrase is used to identify that the boy may have experienced 2 things simultaneously. The 1st thing is that he may have experienced an epiphany, but the 2nd thing that he may also be doing is to be skeptical about what he reads in the blog I am using. After all, the boy doesn’t know who I am. Anyway, the boy might feel bothered by the experience because he is experiencing both the epiphany and the skepticism.

Although I believe that awkwardness faded by now, the experience may have caused the boy to complain to others about his experience with the ‘1st thought volunteer’ example I have typed in. I’d like to say, for the record, that I encourage people, especially kids, to be skeptical when they read the advice I type in this blog. After all, the kids probably don’t know who I am, and learning to be skeptical as a kid can be very useful to kids as they get older. In fact, I have considered sometimes that learning to be skeptical for kids can be the most valuable thing that they are learning, more valuable than the obvious bookmarks that I am typing in. And so, the point I am trying to make is about the complaining that some of the kids may have made about that ‘1st thought volunteer’ example. Less than a minute ago, I just thought of the possibility of how certain mild to moderate instigations and certain inadvertencies may have adversely influenced how you may perceive certain opportunities in regards to complaining. Let me offer you the illustrated example. According to Amazon Video, the reference begins 38 minutes and 2 seconds into episode 3.13 ‘Deja Q’ from series Star Trek: The Next Generation(1990)’, when Q2(Corbin Bernsen) was talking to Q(John de Lancie),

Q2 quote:-‘You know, you’re incorrigible, Q. You’re a lost cause. I can’t go to a single solar system without having to apologize for you, and I’m tired of it!’

The point of the ‘Deja Q’ reference is that, for certain participations, when you make yourself useful to others, offering other people certain opportunities, it may be possible that a few of those people who talk to you may complain to you. That is what I think happened in the ‘Star Trek Deja Q’ episode. when Q2 made himself useful to other aliens as he travels throughout the galaxy, some of those aliens complained to him about Q.

People are trying to carry on as if things are normal. purchase levitra online The injury to nerves, arteries, smooth muscles, and fibrous tissues are most likely a result of an inherent disease. levitra sale like it Tadalafil (20 mg) without prescription affect on the smooth blood flow tadalafil online cheap in the vessels. Mind you, back then I never expected to ever receive emails from someone pretending to be me, selling me wholesale generic viagra ! There are plenty of unscruplous people around who will try to adopt your identity in order to know the difference. I believe that it is possible for an instigator to cause you to avoid people complaining to you in such a way that you may avoid certain opportunities simply because it involves a certain identity of complaining from others. For example, refurbished for this advice for me to say, of course, I experienced a certain complaining from another that knocked the wind out of me, so to speak, because I was not prepared to respond to it.

Well anyway, the solution, so to speak, to instigators imposing a false sense of complaining upon you is to know that a certain amount of complaining from others may unavoidably occur from certain opportunities, and to know that certain forms of complaining may need to be relegated in order for you to reasonably interact with it. according to www.merriam-webster.com, the definition of ‘relegate’ used for this advice is-‘to give (something, such as a job or responsibility) to another person or group’. I guess you can call this ‘relegating responsibility’, or as a bookmark, you may call it ‘relegate complaining’ or ‘relegate complain’. The best illustrated example I can think of right now about someone relegating responsibility to another for this advice, in my opinion, according to Amazon Video, starts 37 minutes and 10 seconds into episode 7.4 ‘Taxed’ from series ‘The Good Wife(2015)’, when Alicia(Julianna Margulies) and Jason(Jeffrey Dean Morgan) are both watching computer surveillance. Most of the details of the reference are not important. What is important for this advice is that it is an example of Alicia relegating a certain complaint to Jason, a complaint that is from one of Alicia’s clients.

(I’m going to get something to eat now. I plan to finish the rest of this advice today).

I don’t have time today to finish this idea, so I plan to finish this idea tomorrow, and start another idea tomorrow.

10/28/2015

So, let’s see if I can go over this again really quickly. Let’s say that you will use the idea that there are many opportunities that may involve some complaining by maybe a few people who choose to be involved in such opportunities(To be fair, I imagine a lot of meetings, so to speak, where even though such meetings are open to the public, only people with a very obvious interest in such meetings attend. I don’t imagine anyone just walking into such meetings in order to instigate a complaint). Also, let’s say you are also using the idea of evaluating certain complaints with the possible consideration that certain complaints may need to be relegated. [Since I want to continue this explanation by not addressing possible interactions that are beyond my ability to explain, there is one more point that I want to address, that many people may need to complain in order to communicate certain notions to other people. For example, although I do not know for certain, I am guessing that the kids who are studying in groups these ideas are complaining about these ideas to each other and to other adults. Kids who are studying these ideas without a study group may still be complaining to their parents and/or family. However, even though complaining may be involved with the kids who are reading these ideas, I still believe that many kids and adults in general still will avoid many aspects of participations that have a certain non preferred sense of complaining involved in such participations. In the most part, so to speak, I believe that to be normal. However, by avoiding certain forms of complaining, in a generalistic sense, such people may also avoid a certain experience with how people need to complain in order to communicate. Although I do not know this for certain, many people in certain business relationships may be having group therapy sessions involved in their business dealings, in order to allow a more manageable sense of complaining to be used in such business dealings with other companies and so forth.

So, since this is standard demographic advice by intent, I recommend, with the rest of this advice, of course, to be aware that other people may need to complain in order to articulate a certain meaning. You may be in a situation where you may allow another person to complain to you, since that person can only use complaining in order to articulate a certain meaning. Of course, the situation to complain doesn’t have to be only serious. Maybe the person or people you choose to allow to complain to you just feel more comfortable to use complaining in order to communicate with others. So, since you have control as to who is allowed to complain to you, you can still develop your own sense of experience with the use of complaining in order to communicate.

The only reference I can think of right now, refurbished for advice, of course, that has examples of people needing to complain is movie ‘Draft Day(2014)’, a sports drama film starring Kevin Costner. In other words, if you want a concentrated example of people needing to complain, a movie that has seriousness in it, yet is not a horror movie, or something that needs an unusual amount of violence, then you may want to use ‘Draft Day’ as a reference.

[Violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi tv series ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation’, tv series ‘The Good Wife’, and movie ‘Draft Day’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmark ‘Relegate complain’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

10/20/2015

Volunteer argue:

I am now able to explain a basic idea called ‘Overlapping’. This idea in my opinion is a ‘Pop the cork’ idea. If you use search engine google.com and type and search the phrase ‘pop the cork photos’, you may see the corks of champagne bottles popping out. However, this idea may take some practice for you to see it’s obvious value more. Therefore, what I did to ‘fast track’ a usefulness for you was to provide for you an example for ‘Overlapping’ called ‘Volunteer argue’. And so, the 1st thing I will do is explain ‘Overlapping’, then I will explain ‘Volunteer argue’.

Overlapping:

Have you ever been sick, let’s say you were sick because you caught some sort of mild cold that involves sneezing. Even though you caught the cold in a non job or non school related situation, you still had to tell your job or school that you were not able to attend because of your cold? The ‘catching the cold’ story is meant to illustrate that, even though you were not able to attend your job or school for an unrelated manner, that unrelated manner still caused you to not be able to attend your job or school. That example leads into this definition of bookmark ‘Overlapping’:-‘An instigator may improperly cause you to give participation credence to a contemplation interjection that overlaps(extends over and covers a part of) certain expectations that you are trying to give active participation with. Her is another example: A few weeks ago, I discovered the definition of bookmark ‘Overlapping’ while I was shopping in a supermarket. I don’t remember what the specific experience was, but whatever I saw/experienced caused me to temporarily give contemplation credence to what I have seen. For an illustration example, refurbished for advice, of course, there is a scene in episode 7.1 ‘Bond’ from tv series ‘The Good Wife(2015)’. According to Amazon Video, the moment starts 14 minutes and 56 seconds into the episode. Soon after Alicia(Julianna Margulies) was done talking to David Lee(Zach Grenier) over the cell phone, she accidentally bumped into someone and said ‘Sorry.’ The moment grabbed her attention because of a conversation Alicia had with Louis Canning(Michael J. Fox) about a story that identifies Alicia as being an apologizer. According to Amazon Video, that ‘apologizer’ story starts 5 minutes and 13 seconds into the episode. Now, in both examples, the one when I was in a supermarket, and Alicia’s character, the experience influenced somewhat what type of composure effort was to be used during that circumstance. The 1st 2 examples may seem somewhat normal, whether it was an instigation or inadvertent. And so, here is a 3rd illustration to make the use of bookmark ‘Overlapping’ more obvious: In episode 1.2 ‘Bart the Genius’ from series ‘The Simpsons(1990)’, 3 students from Bart’s new school were exploiting Bart’s naivete(natural simplicity) by using terminology that Bart does not understand, causing Bart to give up his lunch. According to Amazon Video, the scene begins 13 minutes and 30 seconds into the episode. While the 3rd boy was trying to duplicate what the 1st 2 boys were doing to Bart, Bart disappointingly left the room. This ‘Simpsons’ example is used to show you what it may feel like to consecutively(following one another in succession or order) experience such an instigation from others during certain moments of your job or school attendance. Refurbished for advice, of course, the ‘Simpsons’ reference could be an example of your sense of composure response efforts being taxed by consecutive overlapping instigation.

Here’s the 1st example I invented for bookmark ‘Overlapping’: If you type in phrase ‘graph paper’ in web site www.wikipedia.com, the web site will show you a description of ‘Graph paper’. For the ‘Examples’ section of that description, the web site shows you 4 different types of graph paper. For this example, I’m using the illustration of graph paper identified by phrase ‘Regular graphing paper’. This example is based on that image, Notice that such an image can be interpreted as being comprised of many small squares. Now, let’s use an arbritrary amount, let’s say 5 pieces of such graph paper, and each paper has many expectations moving around in those squares. Now, when you experience an instigation identified by bookmark ‘Overlapping’, a few of those expectations collect on a similar location of those 5 pieces of paper. If you pile those 5 pieces of graph paper on top of each other, you would see that certain expectations are on the same general area for all 5 pieces of graph paper. For example, let’s say that a few of those expectations are on the bottom part of those pieces of graph paper. The area that those certain expectations are coinciding with are called ‘overlapping’ areas. Now, when expectations overlap, a certain few of those expectations will try to dictate what type of composure response effort you use to interpret such an experience.

The solution I have invented for instigations identified by bookmark ‘Overlapping’ is to allow yourself to reasonably choose a composure response effort to generalistically interpret such an experience. Don’t just let the instigation seemingly dictate what type of composure response effort you should use. For example, refurbished for advice, in episode ‘Bart the Genius’ from series ‘The Simpsons’, Bart allowed the pranks from his fellow students to dictate somewhat his use of composure response effort, causing Bart to leave the room. When you experience consecutive overlapping, you may choose instead to sense a reasonable composure response to interpret the situtation. You see, in Bart’s situation, the consecutive composure responses from the pranks were causing Bart to feel unnecessarily drained. He didn’t even feel like he had the energy to complain to the other students. Instead, he felt miserable and left the room. If you experience consecutive overlapping, you can instead control what type of composure effort response you have. And so, instead of feeling miserable and drained like Bart may have felt, you can instead feel a reasonably controlled sense of composure response effort.

Let me try to give you an example of one of the benefits of using bookmark ‘Overlapping’ to identify and more tenably experience the instigation identified by bookmark ‘Overlapping’. Suppose you experience an instigation that has a particular in it that is prevalent and bothersome to you, but it’s bothersomeness seems to be focused on the expectation it used to present itself to you. With the use of bookmark ‘Overlapping’, you may be able to identify the instigation’s bothersomeness as coming from expectations that are not obviously shown by that instigation! Using bookmark overlapping, within reason, of course, you can treat as a separate issue the instigation’s bothersomeness as if it were coming from those other instigations that are being adversely affected by such a particular, even though such an instigation is only presenting itself using a specific expectation. [Well, I tried explaining ‘Overlapping’. Perhaps the explanation of bookmark ‘Volunteer argue’ will help you understand bookmark ‘Overlapping’ more.

I want to do other stuff today, so I’ll just start explaining bookmark ‘Volunteer argue’ tomorrow.

This effect can take place within a few minutes cute-n-tiny.com levitra prescription of taking the tablet. The gentle side issues incorporate viagra generic sale a brainy pain, smoky or a fluid nose, facial flushing, illness, stomach miracle, and unsteadiness. Recent research has shown a connection with dysfunctional circuits in Learn More cialis uk the brain – it seems over-reactivity of parts of the limbic system (the emotional centre of the brain) or of the brain stem may lead to faulty triggers of our fight/flight alarm system. How to Use it The jelly comes in seven (7) different flavors- blackcurrant, butterscotch, mint, orange, pineapple, strawberry and vanilla. viagra sales france 10/21/2015

Volunteer argue

First, I will explain how I invented the use of the word ‘volunteer’. This explanation is in the form of how I 1st thought of it. Within reason presented, it is in the form that is not changed for standard demographic reading. When I thought of this idea for the 1st time, it was just for me to evaluate. And so, here is the explanation: I considered the possibility that, for employees who were not in management, there were many possible job related considerations that non managerial employees may think of that were either difficult to impossible to have a viable use, in regards to it’s associated job related projects. Such considerations simply lacked a certain managerial knowhow. However, even though some people make such considerations that don’t work, there is a consideration that does have coinciding value with management, and that consideration is called ‘volunteering’. According to web site dictionary.com, ‘volunteer’ means-‘a person who voluntarily offers himself or herself for a service or undertaking’. From the perspective of management, when an employee volunteers, it is like the co-worker is a pinata filled with many possibilities(for the definition of ‘Pinata’, I recommend you use www.wikipedia.com). (Of course, the co-worker is not an actual pinata filled with stuff. The ‘pinata’ example is just conceptualized.) Now, this is where the instigator may get involved. An instigator may cause you to have a disparaged, discouraged, distressed sense of volunteering.

That is basically the ‘volunteer’ idea I was thinking about. Notice that the description has a lot of suppositions that may or may not be true. However, I believe that the idea may still be useful to you to show you the value of having a reasonable sense of volunteering, and why a person’s sense of volunteering may be inhibited by an instigator. I believe that, even though an employee does not choose to volunteer, that does not necessarily? (‘?’ means ‘too many variables’, not that I am agreeing with anything inappropriate) mean that such a person should have an impaired sense of volunteering. And so, what bookmark ‘Volunteer argue’ tries to do is to help you have a reasonable sense of volunteering. Whether or not you use that sense of volunteering, is up to you. And, based on my intent, this is the advice that tries to help you: You use bookmark ‘Overlapping’ to identify instigations in your life that have dulled your sense of volunteering, and since you can now interpret such instigations separately, you can now help instigation related experiences have a better sense of volunteering. You may not have done this before because the instigation seemed exclusive to a specific expectation. Now, with the help of bookmark ‘Overlapping’, I recommend you re-interpret mild to moderate instigations that dull your sense of volunteering, and use bookmark ‘Volunteer argue’ to help re-invigorate such particulars of instigations with a reasonable sense of volunteering. The word ‘argue’ is from the next to last paragraph of Wishlist #1017, and is used in case such instigations try to discourage the effectiveness of ‘Volunteer argue’ with a misleading sense of arguing. Of course, you use the entire explanation of Wishlist #1017 when using the word ‘argue’ for bookmark ‘Volunteer argue’.

Before I continue with explanation ‘Volunteer argue’, I’d like to give you the illustrated reference from a movie that I used to make the idea identified by word ‘Volunteer’. The reference is from movie ‘Scrooged(1988)’, and for the sake of background, not what I used to imagine the idea, according to Amazon Video, the reference starts 49 minutes and 16 seconds into the movie, when Lew Hayward(John Forsythe), Frank Cross’s(Bill Murray) boss, is talking about reservations to one of his employees, and then Mr. Hayward invites Frank and his wife Claire(Karen Allen) to join them. If you start with the reference beginning that I recommended to you, you will notice that Frank Cross is wearing a dog costume. Now, when I imagined this scene, since it has probably been years since I watched the movie ‘Scrooged’, I remember Frank wearing a costume and talking to his wife Claire. From that memory, I extrapolated the possible meaning that Frank volunteered to wear that costume, and that he put some serious thought into wearing it. That is the movie I used to make the meaning identified by word ‘Volunteer’. There is also a TV show reference that I used, but I can’t verify that it’s where I think it is, since the show is not available for streaming that I know of. I also checked youtube.com, and I could not find the episode there. You can buy the DVD from Amazon.com, but I don’t expect you to. I think the tv show reference is in episode 3.18 ‘The Fields’ from tv series ‘Earth: Final Conflict(2000)’, when Liam Kincaid(Robert Leeshock) stood up and volunteered his services to a priest in the show.

And now, I will start with an example of ‘Volunteer argue’. I’ll start this example with the only movie reference I can think of right now. According to Amazon Video, the reference starts 44 minutes and 54 seconds into movie ‘Pretty in Pink(1986)’, when Blane(Andrew McCarthy) is talking to Andie(Molly Ringwald) in Steff’s(James Spader) house party, Blane quote:-‘I can’t believe I actually associate with these people.’, Andie:-‘I can’t believe that I’m actually here.’, and the situation gets worse for Blane and Andie when, soon after, they talk to Steff. Now, if you give movie credibility to their situation, let’s say that 20 years have passed since that incident for Blane and Andie. If they were to use bookmark ‘Volunteer argue’ for that situation, as a separate issue from that situation, they would be able to add more of an acceptable sense of volunteering to that situation.

And now for an example for you to use. Have you ever heard of the phrase ‘What was old is new again?’ Well, if you are an adult that attended college, in relation to advice said, of course, think of those embarrassing moments you have experienced, and try using bookmark ‘Volunteer argue’. Basically, if those moments inhibited somewhat your sense of volunteering, as a separate issue using bookmarks ‘Overlapping’ and ‘Volunteer argue’, you may now be able to replenish your sense of volunteering. Notice that you may not have tried to improve your sense of volunteering before this idea because you thought that such incidents were circumstantially exclusive to those incidents. And of course, if you are a kid, teenager, or adult, you can check your mild to moderate experiences in the past that are instigation or inadvertently related, and you may check if any of those experiences have inhibited your sense of volunteering, and then as a separate issue, you may now improve your sense of volunteering for them.

Now, based on my experience using bookmark ‘Volunteer argue’, I recommend that you try to remember the improved version of those 1st few incidents that you use bookmark ‘Volunteer argue’ for. The reason is because, even though I believe this idea may be very useful to you, concerning the adults, for example, since this is by intent standard demographic advice, you may not have that many raw, exact incidents in your lives that this idea may directly help you with. Of course, in an imagined statistical sense, you probably have a few of them, especially if you attended college, but after those few are treated by you, you may experience a little disappointment if you can’t find another instigation or inadvertency that you can experience an epiphany for. Based on my experience, using this ‘Volunteer argue’ idea is like having a quick epiphany rush in the beginning, but after that, you might contemplationally say to yourself, in a manner of speaking, quote-‘Is that it?’ I just don’t want you to dismiss what I believe to be a really good idea for you simply because you couldn’t find any more epiphanies to experience, no offense.

[Violence, viewer discretion for tv series ‘The Good Wife’ and tv animated series ‘The Simpsons’, violence and viewer discretion for tv series ‘Earth: Final Conflict’ and movie ‘Scrooged’, and PG-13 viewer discretion for movie ‘Pretty in Pink’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Overlapping’ and ‘Volunteer argue’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

10/13/2015

Acclimate argue:

1st, for illustration, I recommend that you use a search engine. I used google.com to type in the phrase ‘pop the cork photos’, and google.com presented 12 images of corks from champagne bottles popping off of them. I call this new idea, ‘Acclimate argue’, a ‘pop the cork’ idea because of how it may benefit you, if you have never used such an idea before. I choose to start this idea with a story I refurbished from episode 2.21 ‘Fear Strikes Up a Conversation’ from tv series ‘Sabrina, the Teenage Witch(1998)’. According to Amazon Video, the reference begins 17 minutes and 54 seconds into the episode, when the Quizmaster(Alima Ballard) is giving Sabrina(Melissa Joan Hart) a guided tour of certain people who are supposed to present certain fears that Sabrina is supposed to have. The ‘Sabrina’ reference is refurbished for advice. The illustration that is used for this advice is when Libby(Jenna Leigh Green) dressed as a clown jumps in and scares the Quizmaster. That is the moment that I turned into this story. This story is based on how Libby portrayed by actress Jenna Leigh Green affects the high school students in the ‘Sabrina, the Teenage Witch’ tv show. If you watched the ‘Sabrina’ episodes with Libby in them, you would know that Libby is a rich teenager, but for the purposes of this advice, I have extrapolated her character to include other details. For example, she has a huge influence on the students in her high school. When you see Libby presenting herself as a clown to Sabrina, walking around dressed as a clown is something that she does once a month as a personal project(Keep in mind that the ‘Sabrina’ episode was made in 1998). And so, if you were in her private club or you participated with her in other matters, and you have either seen her walk around in a clown outfit or have heard of it, you would eventually acclimate to that experience. However, if you were not participating with her in a sort of preferred context, a preferred context decided by Libby, and you have either seen her or heard of her walking around in a clown outfit, let’s say for example 3 teenage girls who were not participating with her in a preferred context were walking by Libby in school, Libby’s clown persona would give those 3 teenage girls a sense of acclimation that they cannot resolve in the short amount of time that they would walk past Libby. For another reference, Libby’s acclimation affect in her high school is like the opposite effect that was created using Bianca(Mae Whitman) in the movie ‘The DUFF(2015)’, when Bianca was filmed doing something mildly embarrassing in a mall, and the filming of what she did was sent to all of the high school students in the high school she attended. In the movie ‘The Duff’, Bianca’s actions entertained the other students, but Libby’s actions caused the other students to have difficulty acclimating to what she did.

Now, when you experience certain mild to moderate instigations, you may have difficulty acclimating to certain interjections from those instigations, like how the high school students who are not in Libby’s special social graces are having difficulty acclimating to Libby’s clown persona when they are in close proximity to her, even when they just see her from a distance, such as seeing Libby in their school cafeteria.

composure:

Before I give the solution, there is an idea I just recently realized may be useful for you to have before I give you the solution. To put it in definition form, ‘An instigator may improperly encourage you to dismiss a sense of composure as if that sense of composure is inappropriate in and of itself to have, when it isn’t.’ For example, when you anticipate something from an instigator that you don’t look forward to, and soon after that anticipation, you then experience that minor instigation, both associated composure responses, one from the anticipation, and one from the actual experience of the instigation, are encouraged to be dismissed by the instigation. As an illustration, I recommend you go to youtube.com, and type in ‘chloraseptic it will hurt if I swallow’, and select the Chloraseptic commercial where the girl has a sore throat, and the commercial is depicting the girl thinking to herself, saying in her thoughts ‘It will hurt if I swallow.’, since she has a sore throat. And of course, when she actually swallows, the girl experiences discomfort, and calls for her mom. Of course, in regards to certain mild to moderate instigations, the girl is not you. The illustration, refurbished for advice, does demonstrate how a person anticipates not looking forward to an experience, and then a composure response from the actual experience, both composure responses are not wanted.

sildenafil generic viagra Thus, the affected person needs to be patient, and consume antidepressants for mental health, and Eriacta tablets for recreation. Now such people don’t require their doctor’s permission or suggestion to treat their buy brand cialis problem. Uterine fibroids buy levitra are benign/non-cancerous tumors that grow beneath/inside the uterine wall or outside the uterus. This is truly amazing http://icks.org/n/data/ijks/1482456658_add_file_7.pdf viagra buying online experience and that is why we’ve come up with a list of factors that Affect Penis Health: List begins with unprotected sex, which contracts STDs. Now, if you read and used the composure idea(Wishlist #1003-1008), I believe you may have the experience by now to do what I am about to recommend for you to do. I believe, although I do not know for sure, that the composure idea I have already given you in the beginning lists of this blog is already allowing you to have your own sense of self acceptance of composure, based on your own chosen school of thought. However, instigations you have already experienced or will experience may cause you to ‘start over’, so to speak, to allow an instigator to dictate again the parameters of your composure experience. In other words, even though you already have experience with a composure idea, recent and future instigations may still cause you to change how you perceive your sense of composure. My point is that, when you experience mild to moderate instigations, you should be able to choose to not dismiss the composure response itself, since the composure response is coming from you, and is not necessarily obligated to the instigation that has caused the composure response. For example, in a mild context, when you do not look forward to some sort of instigation that you think will occur soon, of course you don’t look forward to the experience, but you keep the composure response associated with what you think may occur, because the composure response is coming from you, not from the instigation. Basically, the instigator may be causing you to dismiss too much of the composure response that is from you, since it is associated with an instigation you do not want to experience. Of course, you don’t always have to use this idea literally, and all of the time. With a little practice, you may develop your own sense of what and how to regulate your composure responses as it relates to instigations and inadvertencies.

Acclimate argue:

And now, back to the ‘Acclimate argue’ idea. The solution for experiencing certain mild to moderate interjections from instigations that you have difficulty acclimating to is to not need to resolve such acclimations in such a short period of time, but instead you turn that acclimation into an association to what you are supposed to be doing for that moment. For example, in the ‘Libby’ story, if you see her from a distance, or you are near her, instead of just trying to resolve that acclimation interjection of her being in a clown outfit, you make an association to that acclimation interjection to something that you are supposed to be doing for that moment. For example, certain basic courtesies are supposed to be there, or maybe you are talking to someone else at the time, or maybe it’s just simply to mind your own business. The reasonable association is up to you and your chosen circumstance. It is like allowing a person to have an intentional mystery in his/her identity. In the instigator’s identity, you have something that cannot acclimate in a short period of time, so what you do is use that identity as an association to something else. It is my belief that, if you have never tried such an idea before, it’s sense of epiphany can feel like a champagne cork being popped out of it’s bottle.

Now, when you use this idea, instead of just using bookmark ‘Acclimate’ or ‘Acclimating’ to recall this idea, you may want to use bookmark ‘Acclimate argue.’ The word argue is from the last paragraph of Wishlist #1017, when I discussed that an instigator may encourage you to contemplationally argue with aspects of his/her instigation some time after experiencing the instigation, even though when you experienced such an instigation, you did not agree to argue with the instigator. So, when you use bookmark ‘Acclimate argue’, you are using the ‘Acclimate’ idea I have recommend to you in this list, plus you are checking to see if they are encouraging you to argue with them, using the entire idea from Wishlist #1017, of course.

And now, here is an ‘icing on the cake’ refurbished example of someone using this idea. The refurbished for advice example is from ‘Planet of the Dead’ from series ‘Doctor Who(2009)’, and the illustration used according to Amazon Video starts 11 minutes and 36 seconds into the episode. Since this is a science fiction episode, it should be easier for you to remove the inapproprieities involved in the episode, and change the episode’s use for this advice. In other words, whatever it is that the people in that illustration are upset about, according to the changed reference, they are not upset about something that is inappropriate. In fact, you don’t even have to know specifically what they are upset about for this idea. And so, here is the refurbished reference for this idea: The lady wearing the pink shirt, Angela(Victoria Alcock), who is being held by Nathan(David Ames) represents the active interaction of an acclimation that is not able to be resolved in a preferred context, which is why she is being held by Nathan. The person who represents using this ‘Acclimate argue’ idea is Christina(Michelle Ryan). In this example, Christina of course notices what just recently happened, and for certain expectations, that incident does not have a resolved acclimation yet. However, instead of interacting with such an acclimation like Angela, Nathan, or Barclay(Daniel Kaluuya) are, she instead chooses to associate such an unresolved acclimation as something else, and that something else is to try to figure out how to get back home by discussing the problem with The Doctor(David Tennant).

[Some viewer discretion for tv series ‘Sabrina, the Teenage Witch’, PG-13 viewer discretion for movie ‘The DUFF’, violence and viewer discretion for tv series ‘Doctor Who’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Pop the cork’ and ‘Acclimate argue’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

10/7/2015

Answer is already there:

If you watched the movie ‘Mission: Impossible-Ghost Protocol(2011)’, remember that scene when Benji(Simon Pegg) and Ethan Hunt(Tom Cruise) entered the Kremlin Palace and were using their high tech technology to project a false background? According to Amazon Video, the reference I am referring to begins 27 minutes and 1 second into the movie, when Ethan is holding Benji’s arm. Seconds after that, the movie shows the computer pad displaying the words ‘RENDER COMPLETE’, and soon after that, Ethan presents a gesture to indicate to Benji to calm down, since Ethan cannot say anything. The reason for the ‘Mission: Impossible-Ghost Protocol’ reference is to offer you an illustrated example of ‘lag time’. While the computer was rendering/creating a background image, the time it used to create that image is an example of ‘lag time’. Now, as an imagined example that may be useful to you, when you experience a minor instigation, even though it may take only a few seconds to call upon a bookmark to contemplationally say, most of those few seconds may be construed as ‘lag time’. Also, for the sake of brevity, since kids may be using such advice, trying to use a bookmark contemplationally to help more tenably experience an unavoidable instigation may feel like the pressure your thumb uses when pressing on the button of one of those pens that have a button on one of it’s ends. As you initiate the use of the bookmark, you may try to use more contemplation pressure in order to make the bookmark work. Using a question designed just for this advice, not an indication of something you said, you may say the question-‘So, what’s wrong with that? I always do that!’ Isn’t that one purpose for advice, to help add or improve on what you are already doing? I didn’t say there was anything wrong with that. However, this advice is using that as an indicator to illustrate to you how this advice works:

Here is one speculated example, just an example, as to what happens when you use a bookmark for a minor instigation. When you experience such a minor instigation, it induces a response from you, like the response of opening an umbrella when it rains or taking your jacket off when you arrive at school or work. If you imagine objectively noticing how you experience a mild instigation, you may notice that the instigator is trying to induce a particular response that will cause you to respond/react in a certain manner. And so, what I did was invent an idea that says that ‘the answer is already there’, that certain bookmarks that you would want to use for the experience is already ‘in play’. Although I only started using a certain form of this idea only a few months ago, based on my experience, this idea won’t give you a preferred response for every mild to moderate instigation, but when it does, you may want to keep this idea as a possible option to consider.
What is more important is to realize that erectile dysfunction mainly affects the health of intimacy of senior people & therefore low price levitra provides with the essential help of improvising the health of intimacy of such patients. It improves your memory and helps you to remember things online levitra easily. This medicine has to be eaten separately and not by the composition of any other viagra 50mg pill of erection issues or other sexual disorder. In this way, sildenafil samples treats this sexual problem.
Here is another example I am recommending you to consider using a ‘Chia Pet’ commercial, if you go to youtube.com and type in phrase ‘chia pet commercial’, you should be given a selection of commercials to choose from. I only looked at one of them, but according to it’s description, it was introduced 9 years ago and was viewed over 700,000 times. In the beginning of that commercial, some of it’s words, which I believe is it’s slogan, says ”Chia Pet’, The Pottery That Grows’. There are moments in the commercial that show you a time lapse of growth. For example, the commercial will show you less than 1 second what the Chia Pet looks like in the first 2 days of how the seeds grow, and then it will show you another second of what the ‘Chia Pet’ looks like after the next 2 days, up until 2 weeks. When you see those seconds of growth shown to you one after the other, it looks like the Chia Pet’s seeds made a full growth in under 5 seconds! Anyway, to be blunt, when you use a bookmark for certain minor instigations, because of the response you feel from the instigation, and this is just a guess, I am not sure, you tend to start from the beginning, as if you have to physically open an umbrella when it starts to rain, so to speak, or you have to physically remove your jacket when you get in your school or job, so to speak, in order to deal with the response induced by the instigation. However, when you start using bookmark ‘(The) Answer is already there.’, you don’t have to re-initiate your use of bookmark, since it is already there! All right, in the beginning of using this idea, this may seem like something you could only imagine to work. Therefore, I recommend you just try this idea out for minor, easily dismissable instigations only. Oh, I forgot to mention. The point of the ‘Chia Pet’ example is to illustrate to you, just in the context of advice, that your answer is already there. It’s already fully developed, so to speak. You may not have to re-create it again.

OK, here’s another example, and then I’ll continue explaining. Let’s say a bunch of teenager girls are attending one of those school sponsored social events that has dancing and stuff, and basically you just imagine a few seconds of them in a group, one of them is saying something to the others, the others are listening and laughing, they are all having fun, and then you just pause one of those moments. Now, in that general moment, not just in that paused moment, what are they thinking about? What is on the top of their heads, so to speak? Even though they subscribe to many expectations that exist outside of that social event, I don’t think they are aware of what many of those expectations are. At that moment, they are just having fun. Now, when you experience an instigation, in a manner of speaking, the use of those bookmarks that are already there could be like how many expectations are associated to those teenage girls, even though those teenage girls are just having fun during that social event, and they are not aware of such expectations using the same intensity that they are using when having fun in that social event. So, using the teenage girl example, if you experience a certain minor instigation, if you use this idea, you can establish to yourself that ‘the answer is already there’, so to speak, but you still experienced the instigation. And so, you imagine ‘back tracking’ to before you experienced that instigation, you let the events unfold, and then you use your bookmark to deal with the experience in a more favorable context. Based on my experience using this idea, one of your 1st experiences ‘back tracking’ certain minor instigations is that this idea has a ‘pick up’ effect that is in your favor for the misleading inclination of response imposed by the instigation. If you want to, you may ‘back track’ to as far as your home, let’s say the starting point in your home is your tv set, to before you left your place of residence, allow yourself to imagine yourself leave the house, experience other chosen events, until you reach the instigation in question in order to use the answer that is already there.

Violence, viewer discretion for movie ‘Mission: Impossible-Ghost Protocol’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of movie. [Use mental bookmark ‘Answer is already there.’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

10/6/2015

Argue feel:

The purpose of this advice is to help people develop more of a sense of allowability, since experienced instigations tend to make innocent people who experience such instigations use a more overemphasized sense of justification. Here is the idea that I imagined that is not an instigation in and of itself, but the intent of this advice is to improve it’s situation and use it’s refurbished example to help people have a more available sense of allowability. And so, here is the idea that I am imagining for this advice:

Although I am not recommending the tv show ‘The Player(2015)’ as a specific reference, when I watched the tv show, it inspired me to use celebrity actor Wesley Snipes, who portrays character Mr. Johnson, in that tv show, to be in this idea. So, if you want to, without using the inapproprieities in that show for this advice and if you choose to, you can see a few minutes of the tv show ‘The Player’ to just verify the performance of Wesley Snipes in that show. And so, here is how the idea begins: I imagined from another similar alternate reality celebrity actor Wesley Snipes falling in love and marrying a hispanic lady he met in one of his movies that was partly filmed in Puerto Rico. Since he is fluent in speaking Spanish, he was able to communicate with his soon to be wife, who only speaks Spanish. Of course, when they got married, she moved to America to live with her husband. Now, this is one of those marriages where the social circles of both who are married are different. Also, the hispanic lady is poor, and of course, Wesley Snipes is a rich celebrity in this idea. After a few months into the marriage, he started to see certain minor concerns turn into issues, based on how she interacts with him with her social mentality. For a movie illustration, I remember when watching the movie ‘The Tracker(1988)’, Noble Adams(Kris Kristofferson) was telling his son Tom Adams(Mark Moses) about when he was with his wife and his wife’s friends. Because Noble Adams was not a rich tracker, and his wife was from a rich aristocracy(a class of persons holding exceptional rank and privileges, especially the hereditary nobility), he distressingly noticed how he was not accepted in her wife’s social element. And so, since certain social mannerisms from his wife were not reciprocating with what he believes to be certain relevant issues in their new lives, he eventually brought those non-reciprocating mannerisms to her attention.

Now, here is the solution I am trying to get to. It is my belief, even though I do not know for certain, that American grammar schools and high schools accomodate their students in ways that many of those students are not aware of, without needing certain obvious reciprocations from those students for such accomodations. The accomodations also contribute to the ambiance that is offered to the students to experience. In the ‘Wesley Snipes’ story, the idea is to give an option to Wesley Snipes, to help him be more allowable to his wife’s mannerisms, using bookmarks. For example, if you think of the ‘Wesley Snipes’ story as just a computer program, and you add the bookmarks for Wesley Snipes to choose to use that will allow him to be more allowable with how his wife communicates to him, you may see that the results may change in a more positive way, even though he will still talk to his wife about certain changes in her presentation of mannerisms that may be important. The option will be like how American grammar schools and high schools treat their students. Mr. Snipes will be able to allow more of those mannerisms to continue without needing a preferred reciprocation for them. Now, refurbished for this advice, of course, once you are able to imagine how Mr. Snipes is able to do that, such an example extrapolated for your situation may help you develop more of a sense of allowability.

Experts say that a timely diagnosis india viagra online and correct medication can control the problem at the preliminary stage, and there is no explicit event that triggers the attack. But this can be tricky as you will have to follow the dosage pattern tadalafil overnight delivery that is to have at least eight hours of sleep every night. There are several offline as well as online pharmacies that are not authorized to sell Kamagra online, which should always be noted when you are purchasing icks.org cialis 10mg price medication online. But cialis order online these inhibitors do not function in everyone, leading to the formation of stones in them. I call this idea ‘Argue feel’ because that is the best idea I can think of right now to offer you. ‘Argue feel’ identifies an instigation that is encouraging you to emotionally feel an argument for you to respond to. An example to emotionally feel is given near beginning of movie ‘Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home(1986)’, when the memory test Spock was taking asked Spock the question-‘How do you feel?’

Here is an example of the use of ‘Argue feel’ explained by a story of how adults are affected when they visit the grammar schools and high schools they have attended based on how I imagined it for the story, not based on a proposed impression of reality. To be clear, I just imagined the story. It’s not real. OK, so here’s the story: A man who took for granted the accomodations he experienced in grammar school and high school decided to visit it one day. As he was there, he heard a noise from the schools, and he said to himself ‘Oh, that noise. Never knew how much I loved it.’ End of story. His response is a direct quote from episode ‘Doctor Who: Last Christmas(2014)’. If you have cable tv, the episode is probably available to you with the cable tv service. The ‘Last Christmas’ episode is also available from Amazon Video, and according to Amazon Video, the reference begins 4 minutes and 51 seconds into the episode, when Clara(Jenna Coleman) hears the TARDIS engines?humming. As she hears the engines?, she says to herself quote-‘Oh, that noise. Never knew how much I loved it.’ When you experience mild instigations identified by your use of bookmark ‘Argue feel’, I recommend that you project that feeling from both the imagined feeling of school and also the imagined feeling illustrated by the ‘Doctor Who’ episode, in relation to advice, of course. When I used this idea for the 1st time, it was yesterday, and I only used it while I was bringing my clothes to the laundromat and while I was in the laundromat for a total I’d say for less than 1 hour, and I haven’t used the idea actively since. I think I just used the TARDIS part, not the school part, of the idea. The school part of this idea was to help you understand the idea. The point of that exercise is to at least allow you to have an imagined sense of what it may be like to allow certain mannerisms to continue without needing a preferred reciprocation for them.

I chose to type this idea now to help avoid a certain pretense as to what type of ideas I plan to type in. If I typed in a new concept instead of this ‘Wesley Snipes’ idea, you might start to develop doubt, or you might start to develop more doubt, as to what type of ideas I will type in. At least with this ‘Wesley Snipes’ idea, it is my hope that some of your doubts are assuaged(to make milder or less severe; relieve; ease; mitigate), so to speak. I plan to introduce more concepts to you that may improve your use of bookmark ‘Argue feel’.

Violence, viewer discretion for tv series ‘The Player’ and ‘Doctor Who’. Violence and viewer discrtion for movies ‘The Tracker’ and ‘Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home’. Use only refurbished for advice references mentioned. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmark ‘Argue feel’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

[I plan to type another idea in tomorrow.

9/30/2015

Smack attention:

Even though I believed that the previous list, Wishlist #1016, was presented as a hygiene issue, based on imagination, I discovered a day or so after I have typed in the episode that other people, kids and adults, may have still experienced some sort of embarrassment, even though at the time I typed in the advice I thought that my embarrassment alone may have been the only problem. Well, since I have made the imagined discovery that other people may have also experienced embarrassment, whether induced by instigation or other reasons, in relation to advice said, of course, I decided to make the next idea in a way that is capable of existing in the embarrassment of others(Keep in mind that I am just using that ‘existing in the embarrassment of others’ idea to help me make a new idea. I am not certain what your embarrassments are really like). The ‘existing in the embarrassment of others’ idea is based on a scene in episode 3.7 ‘Equilibrium’ from series ‘Seaquest 2032(1995)'(Of course, the scene is refurbished for advice, and is not interpreted literally). Although season 3 is not available on DVD, according to the search engine google.com, it is available for streaming to your computer, or you can watch the scene for free in web site youtube.com. According to youtube, the scene starts 27 minutes and 24 seconds into the episode. That is when Captain Bridger(Roy Scheider) shows Lucas(Jonathan Brandis) algae that is able to live in the microbe contamination.

When this past Monday came around, I wasn’t able to remember the original bookmarks that I had invented using the ‘Seaquest’ episode. Although I think I can back-track to a previous moment and work my way to recalling those bookmarks, I believe I have invented a replacement for those bookmarks that may be better than the bookmarks I have forgotten, since I can still sense the replacement bookmark’s ‘attention span’. And so, the bookmarks that I have recently invented around 9/28/2015 are the bookmarks I am explaining right now. It’s understanding bookmark form is called ‘Surprise reciprocate.’, but the bookmark you may use when you experience the instigation it identifies is called ‘Smack attention.’ Although I am optimistic that you will find this idea useful, I still recommend 3 concepts that I have already introduced in this blog, 1)the composure idea(Wishlist #1003-1008), 2)articulation not the same(Wishlist #1013), and the ‘Pinch’ bookmark, which is located in Wishlist #1015 dated 9/2/2015. Since this is meant to be standard demographic advice, if you use those 3 concepts, you may be more likely to find useful the new idea I am typing in now.

Reciprocate:

Since understanding bookmark ‘Surprise reciprocate.’ is really 2 bookmarks joined together to form a new idea, I will explain the 2 bookmarks separately, then I will explain it’s combined meaning. The 1st bookmark I will explain is ‘Reciprocate.’

I am beginning the explanation of ‘Reciprocate.’ with it’s reference. The scene is from movie ‘How to Deal(2003)’, and according to Amazon Video, the scene starts 45 minutes and 37 seconds into the movie. That is when Halley Martin(Mandy Moore) opens one of the porcelain vases that she believes has cigarettes in them, takes one of the cigarettes, and smokes it. Of course, I am not promoting the smoking of cigarettes. The point is that, at least refurbished for advice, Halley did not even think twice, so to speak, when she smoked that cigarette. Let’s say, for example, that scene in a movie context was supposed to exist in 1980. It is my belief that most of the guests who smoke cigarettes who enter that bathroom would choose to smoke those cigarettes. And that is one example of reciprocation. The definitions I have found in the internet for ‘reciprocation’ seem to be lacking, so therefore I will try to explain it myself. ‘Reciprocate’ as it is used in this advice means-‘to expect something in return, or something that is deserved’. When Halley smoked that cigarette, she believed that it was something that was expected to be available for her to use.

Now, this is how I invented the bookmark ‘Reciprocate.’ I recently imagined a non specific courtesy given for me to use, and the man who gave it to me, who has no discernable features, like he is partially speaking in the shadows of a room, says quote-‘Why does he need reciprocation for that?’ I suppose that, without being aware of the details, I was using that question as a diagnostic for certain imagined goals. Anyway, the point is that I originally invented that situation to specifically help me identify an instigation I was only able to sense at the time, and this is the specifics that I have discovered with the question-‘Why does he need reciprocation for that?’

Before I begin, the purpose of this explanation is to help you more tenably experience an unavoidable instigation, not to dismiss it. For example, when I will explain the concept of another person getting your attention, the purpose of this advice is not to simply dismiss or ignore such a person, but to make such interjections of attention more manageable. And so, here are the specifics: An instigator may improperly impose a sense of grabbing your attention by imposing a false sense of reciprocation for that attention.

Let’s start at the beginning for this ‘grabbing your attention’ instigation with a generalistic example. Let’s say, before this particular instigation occurs, the same instigator wants to improperly impose an instigation upon you that is designed to get you angry. I believe the idea behind the angry inducing instigation is to get you to use a contemplation effort coming from you, so that the 2nd instigation, the ‘grabbing your attention’ instigation, becomes more effective. However, if you read bookmark ‘Articulation not the same.(Wishlist #1013)’, your sense of chosen objectivity is somewhat protected, which means that, with the help of bookmark ‘Articulation not the same.’, you can more objectively notice that the instigation is trying to cause you to lose focus with your own anger. In short, that ‘angry’ trick won’t be as effective on you. And now, here is the 2nd instigation: The instigator improperly imposes a sense of reciprocation upon the sense of attention that the instigator wants you to experience. For example, have you ever experienced an instigation that clearly shows to you that you have done nothing wrong, and yet you are still bothered by the experience hours after it happened? The possible reason why is that the instigator is ‘grabbing your attention’ for the experience by focusing his/her efforts on the attention itself by using an impression of a reciprocation requirement upon the attention’s identity.

Here is an example of an instigator ‘grabbing your attention’. In episode 2.22 ‘Tom Connolly’ from series ‘The Blacklist(2015)’, according to Amazon Instant Video, 13 minutes and 25 seconds into the episode, here is a quote:

Elizabeth Keen(Megan Boone):-‘What are you doing?’

Raymond Reddington(James Spader):-‘I have an appointment. This is a war that must be fought on many fronts. You have yours. I have mine.

I’m using ‘The Blacklist’ quote to show you that your possible experience that is ‘grabbing your attention’ is coming from a different ‘front’ that maybe you are not too familiar with, even though you may have experienced such an instigation many times before. [Well anyway, I am going to continue with this explanation. If you have some trouble understanding this ‘grabbing your attention’ point, maybe you will better understand it after I finish explaining the entire idea.

Surprise:

An instigator may use an imposed sense of surprise to cause you to not more tenably experience an instigation that is introduced with the imposed surprise. For example, if an instigation you experienced was just a minor insult, you may be able to easily allocate the experience. However, if the minor insult was introduced to you with a sense of surprise, then the insult may have been experienced without the convenience of allocating minor insults that don’t have an associated sense of surprise with it. Now, if you experienced ‘a lot’ of such insults throughout the course of 1 day every day, it could add up to be an obvious burden to you.
overnight cialis delivery robertrobb.com Its effect lasts for four to six hours. A woman’s ovaries produce large amounts of sex hormones – progesterone and oestrogen. cheap viagra tablets Vegetables Pureed or mashed sweet potato, carrots, pumpkin, visit that storefront viagra price green peas, spinach etc. 3. In patient that had http://robertrobb.com/a-way-to-get-schools-more-money-now/ cheapest cialis india problems with heart may increase stroke or arrhythmia.
Surprise reciprocate:

Combine both ‘surprise’ and ‘reciprocate’, and you have an instigation identified by bookmark ‘Surprise reciprocate.’ One interpretation of ‘Surprise reciprocate.’ is that the instigation is using a sense of surprise to cause you to have more of a difficulty to more tenably identify a sense of your attention being grabbed with the use of a sense of reciprocation for the identity of the attention that is grabbing you itself. For example, if you choose to, if you recall several of the instigations that bothered you for hours after experiencing such an instigation, you can use bookmark ‘Surprise reciprocate.’ to check if the instigation is using a sense of surprise and attention directed reciprocation to make it more difficult for you to recall the experience more tenably.

Shock surprise:

The word ‘Shock’ is used to identify an experienced instigation that has a certain bothersome intensity of experience. The word ‘Shock’ is not used literally. Here are some examples where the word/bookmark ‘Shock’ may be used to identify a sort of intensity of experience. In episode 2.12 ‘Fear Her’ from series ‘Doctor Who(2006)’, according to Amazon Video, the scene starts 21 minutes and 11 seconds into the episode. The Doctor(David Tennant) grabs a peanut butter jar, opens it, and uses his fingers to eat it. Now, the 1st time I watched the episode, I clearly remember both Rose(Billie Piper) and Trish(Nina Sosanya) both expressing an obvious disapproval of The Doctor eating peanut butter using his fingers. I remember Rose shaking her head with a certain associated mild shock, and Trish complementing(something that completes) Rose’s disapproval. Now, if you look at the Amazon Video that is available, Rose still shakes her head with disapproval, but it’s not the same as compared to the 1st time I watched it on tv. Anyway, using the version I watched, I use the word ‘Shock’ to identify the intensity of experience that Rose and Trish experienced when they disapproved of The Doctor eating peanut butter using his fingers.

The 2nd example of using the word ‘Shock’ to identify an intensity of experience, which I highly recommend because the episode illustrates the effects with slow motion, is from episode 2.2 ‘Jane Seymour’ from series ‘Hi-Jinks’, episode available from Amazon Video. According to Amazon Video, the episode begins 16 minutes and 49 seconds into the episode. Basically, the scene gives you a few examples of individual families taking their kids to an art museum, and when they would see a particular painting, someone in a costume would break through the painting. Of course, the kids are with their parents when this happens. You get to see in slow motion how each of the kids responded to seeing the person in a costume break through the painting. Refurbishing the episode for advice, of course, I recommend you use the word ‘Shock’ to identify the intensity of experience for those kids, and use that as an example for mild to moderate instigations. [I think 2 examples are enough to give you a starting sense of how the word ‘Shock.’ may be used to identify certain intensities of experience you may have with instigations.

Shuffling bookmarks:

And now, what I will do is try to give you an example of ‘Shuffling bookmarks.’ using the bookmarks I have addressed in this list. First, one reason you may choose to group bookmarks together, separate them, then group them again with other bookmarks, is to familiarize yourself with the various meanings in order to decide which bookmark will be used to eventually identify the instigation. Let’s say you familiarize yourself with a particular bookmark. Since you know it, you don’t have to repeat it, and so, you no longer have to ‘say’ that bookmark in your head, since you already know it’s meaning. OK, so here’s the example. Let’s say that an instigator from your job or school imposed a minor instigation in the form of an insult that is using both surprise and shock in it, and the experience is still bothering you, even after a few hours after it happened. Basically, you are on your bed, and you are a little restless. You are losing some sleep over it. So, let’s start from the beginning of this premise.

Let’s use bookmark ‘Surprise reciprocate.’ The instigation has elements of both ‘surprise’ and ‘attention grabbing reciprocation’, but the instigation still bothers you. At least now, you are familiar with bookmark ‘Surprise reciprocate.’, so you think of your selection of bookmarks. Let’s say such a selection consists of these bookmarks: ‘Pinch’, ‘Sting’, ‘Snap’, ‘Smack’, ‘Attention’, and ‘Shock’. After you consider your options, you choose bookmarks ‘Shock attention.’ and ‘Shock surprise.’ That allowed you to address some of the brunt of the instigation, but you don’t want to keep using such intense bookmarks, and so you eventually settle with bookmark ‘Smack attention.’ or ‘Smack surprise.’ Of course, you can use any of the bookmarks you are already familiar with, in case you change your mind, or maybe you just want to review to yourself what those familiar bookmarks mean. And that’s it! That is, of course, just one example of ‘Shuffling bookmarks.’ that you may choose to use.

Next week, I plan to introduce to you some? basic concepts of bookmark use.

[Violence, viewer discretion for tv series ‘Seaquest 2032’, rated PG-13 discretion for movie ‘How to Deal’, violence and viewer discretion for tv series ‘The Blacklist’, violence and viewer discretion for tv series ‘Doctor Who’, and some viewer discretion for series ‘Hi-Jinks’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Surprise’, ‘Reciprocate’, Surprise reciprocate’, ‘Shock’, ‘Shock attention’, ‘Shock surprise’, ‘Smack attention’, and ‘Smack surprise’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

10/1/2015:

Shock complain reciprocate:

Since the next idea I plan to type in will be a new one, I thought it would be prudent(wise or judicious in practical affairs) to type in one of the upgrades I invented to this idea now, and this is how it goes: You take what I said earlier, about the instigator for a particular instigation trying to cause you to get angry, but your use of bookmark ‘Articulation not the same.’ allows you to more objectively see that. However, what the instigator may still try is cause you to contemplationally think/imagine that the instigator is complaining/arguing to you about the instigation he/she imposed upon you. So, let’s say you did nothing wrong, so to speak, when you experienced the instigation. However, the instigator may still have caused you to imagine that the instigator is complaining about the instigation imposed upon you to you.

The solution is that, even though the instigator in reality will believe what he/she wants, you did not agree to complain/argue with the instigator. Think about it: You are imagining that an instigator is arguing or complaining to you about some instigation he/she initiated, but you did not even agree to participate in such a discussion! Well anyway, I call the experience ‘Shock complain reciprocate.’ because the complaint is probably using some sort of brunt interjection from the instigator that may have offended you, and the word ‘Shock’, a word previously explained, may help you more objectively identify such an interjection. Other bookmark variations I also recommend are: ‘Smack complain reciprocate.’, ‘Interrupt complain reciprocate.’, ‘Shock complain.’, and ‘Smack complain.’

Use mental bookmarks ‘Shock complain reciprocate.’, ‘Shock complain.’, ‘Smack complain reciprocate.’, and ‘Smack complain.’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

[2/2/2018: If you are planning to use the triple point injection or have used the triple point injection for your lower back problems, it is urgent that you stop using the T/Sal shampoo and your foot spray for one month. After that time, it is urgent that you significantly reduce your use of T/Sal shampoo, and only use your foot spray when you need to. See Wishlist #1113 for further details.]

(Before I continue further, so as to not waste any of your time, I am about to recommend the use of a product called ‘Neutragena T/Sal Shampoo, Scalp Build-Up Control’ for teenagers and adults. I am not making any money from this recommendation. I just believe this is a hygiene issue. If you choose not to purchase this product, then of course you don’t have to continue reading. I will continue giving bookmark advice in the next list.)

Here is a review of what I have already typed in before I continue further: You have your ‘composure’ idea(Wishlist #1003-1008), your ‘articulation not the same’ idea(Wishlist #1013), and your ‘reverse polarity’ idea(Wishlist #1015). If you have read all 3 ideas, then it may make what I am about to type in more understandable.

What I am about to say will be the most embarrasing thing that I have said in these Wishlists, in both the Amazon lists that I have typed in amazon.com, and in this blog. However, in spite of my self embarrassment, I believe this information may be useful to you. I have been typing in these ideas for a while, and one of the things that I have learned, based on some of the responses that I have imagined coming from many of those that read these ideas(or statistically could read these ideas), is that I would actually have to show you the exact paragraph in the book, metaphorically speaking, in order for you to consider using certain advice. That is what I am going to try to do now.

Here’s a quote from ‘The Boston Globe’ to start my explanation.  According to The Boston Globe:

http://www.boston.com/news/science/articles/2008/09/01/does_the_dust_in_my_house_really_include_my_own_skin/

‘Taking off some of the dead skin cells on the surface of your skin is what some people do on purpose and refer to as “exfoliation.”‘

[According to web site about.com,

http://skincare.about.com/od/exfoliating/qt/What-Percentage-Of-Your-Dust-Is-Actually-Dead-Skin-Cells.htm

‘Your body sheds dead skin cells on a constant basis. Look at your legs. If your skin is dry, you’ll actually see flaky skin cells that are easy (to) brush off. Those are dead skin cells. Lotion won’t cure it. The only thing you can do is exfoliate.’

[And here is a quote from web site link
It is called online viagra store ; the reason is that Sildenafil Pills may lead to some reactions, if they are not used according to the prescribed dosage. As a result, the prevention of an levitra price egg takes place from ripening and after being released from the ovaries after every month. Rather, schedule another time for you soft cialis pills to discuss these problems. 2. Shopping around through online shops have been a boon for this kind of people who feel shy in going to a chemist physically, you can buy these ED drugs online buy generic viagra https://unica-web.com/films2007.xls today.
https://www.dandruffdeconstructed.com/tsal/

for the Neutrogena T/Sal shampoo:

‘Salicylic Acid doesn’t treat dandruff of any description but rather exfoliates the skin of the dead cells. It won’t treat the underlying cause at all but gets rid of the build up on your scalp.’

According to the Neutrogena T/Sal Scalp Build-Up Control box, the shampoo’s active ingredient is 3% Salicylic Acid, it’s #1 dermatologist recommended, and it’s gentle enough for everyday use(assuming you’re not allergic to it).

According to Amazon.com, I ordered 2 of these shampoos on Sept. 11, 2015. This is the 1st time I ordered and used this shampoo. Based on my experience with the shampoo, I believe the use of this product may be useful to you. Is it something you may need? No, I don’t believe you may need to use this product. Is it something that may improve your sense of hygiene? Yes, I believe that, for many people, the use of this shampoo may improve their sense of hygiene, based on the definition of hygiene from web site dictionary.com: hygiene-‘a condition or practice conducive to the preservation of health, as cleanliness.’. So, basically, it is my belief that, for many of you, your sense of cleanliness will improve if you use this shampoo.

For example, when you take a shower, you feel cleaner, after you brush your teeth, your mouth feels more refreshed. I believe that you may also benefit from the use of the T/Sal shampoo as an exfoliant. Even though you may not need to use the shampoo, I believe the occassional use of it may contribute to your sense of hygiene.

Now, I’m only recommending the use of this product for hygiene purposes for teenagers, men and women. For the teenagers, men, and women, in a generalistic sense, I recommend that you just use it for your scalp like it is a regular shampoo, as you are taking a shower, for example. However, for the older teenage boys and the men, based on my own experience using this shampoo, I also recommend, using respectful maturity said, for the sake of cleanliness, I also recommend that you occassionally use this shampoo for your underarms and groin area. Keep in mind, that, according to a previous quote, Salicylic Acid(the active ingredient for the shampoo) doesn’t treat dandruff of any description but rather exfoliates the skin of the dead cells. Based on my experience using the shampoo, not only does the shampoo help prevent build-up of extra skin from your scalp, but it can also prevent build-up of extra skin from your underarms and groin area. (I know it’s a shampoo, but when you rinse the shampoo from your head when you take a shower, other parts of your body are also exposed to the shampoo).

And so, for the older teenage boys and men who choose to continue to use this recommendation, I recommend that, once a week, you apply a little of the T/Sal to your underarms and groin area, and if you are not allergic to it, of course, you let it sit there for 20-30 minutes before you take a shower. Of course, said with respectful maturity, before you add the shampoo to your underarms and groin area, inspect the surface are of your underarms and groin area with your hands, to let yourself compare if there is going to be a difference after you use the shampoo. Wear a shirt and underwear that you will replace afterward during the 20-30 minutes. While you are taking a shower, use some sort of washcloth or sponge to remove the shampoo from your underarms and groin area. And that’s it! Saying this with respectful maturity, of course, after you take a shower and you have dried yourself off, you will notice that a lot of the obvious build up from your underarms and groin area that was there before is no longer there(You may not notice a build up until you have compared how the treated areas are cleaner). Instead, you now have a better sense of hygiene, of cleanliness.

According to Amazon.com, the T/Sal Scalp Build-Up Control shampoo is less than 9 dollars each for 4.5 fl oz, but I’ve seen it cheaper in the internet elsewhere using google.com. I bought it from Amazon because I have Amazon Prime shipping.

If you have never used the T/Sal Scalp Build-Up Control shampoo before, I recommend you read the reviews in Amazon.com concerning the product, and of course if you get some sort of allergic reaction the 1st time you use it, stop using it.

8/5/15

The beginnings of bookmark use:

Before I begin, the only motivation I can think of right now that I will use to start explaining ‘The beginnings of bookmark use.’ is episode 9.1 ‘The Magician’s Apprentice’ from series ‘Doctor Who(2015)’. According to web site www.wikipedia.com, the episode is scheduled to be broadcasted on September 19th of this year. What I am trying to say is that I look forward to the new season of tv series ‘Doctor Who’. I don’t know what ‘The Magician’s Apprentice’ is about. I just want to see new ‘Doctor Who’ episodes. Now, in my opinion, to use only a ‘Doctor Who’ episode as motivation is disappointing, considering what I believe is actually out there. Of course, there are other tv shows and movies that may be made available to me, such as the fact that I have a DVD/Blu-ray mail rental service and cable tv service available to me, but because of the standards I give this advice, the only thing I can think of right now worth mentioning is the next new ‘Doctor Who’ episode. I mention this to you because I am using those new ‘Doctor Who’ episodes as motivation to type in this idea. I am not recommending the use of those new ‘Doctor Who’ episodes specifically for this advice. If I do in the near future, I will specifically say so.

Since I also wanted a song to go with the beginning of my explanation of ‘The beginnings of bookmark use.’, I just spent the last 10 or so minutes looking for one. Since keeping up with the latest music trends is not my expertise, the only song and music video I can think of right now is ’22’ by Taylor Swift. A few minutes ago, I just purchased the song from Amazon, and I think I only paid a dollar and 29 cents for it. According to an article about the song ’22’ in web site wikipedia.com, the song is identified as ‘a fun anthem for sleepover parties’. Since I also watched it’s music video, it is my belief that it’s music video is also a fun anthem for sleepover parties. Although I am not sure, the music video ’22’ is probably available at youtube.com, and if you have cable tv service, your cable tv service may be able to provide music video’22’ for free with your service. Although according to wikipedia.com, the song was released in March 12, 2013, it’s still the best song I can think of to help me type this idea in. So, basically, I recommend that, if you choose to, just for motivation, that you listen to song ’22’ and/or watch it’s music video either before or during the beginnings of explanation ‘The beginnings of bookmark use.’ I just recommend listening to that song in the beginning of this explanation. You don’t have to listen to it throughout the entire explanation. And, of course, you don’t have to listen to it at all if you don’t want to. It’s just a recommendation.

OK, here it is: I’ll start with one of the discoveries I’ve made concerning the contemplational resolving of instigation. I think I’ve made this discovery over a year ago. Since I don’t have volunteers working for me to make bookmarks, I’ll only use my own experiences as a reference. Over a year ago, I made the discovery that certain instigations, when you try to resolve them in your mind, try to maintain a certain resisting identity. To represent that resisting to resolve identity, I use the conceptualization of wrestling, in a mild, reasonable context to be imagined, of course, one of the wrestlers is the instigator, the other wrestler is not necessarily you, but is encouraged to be you.(For an example of wrestling, I recommend movie ‘Vision Quest(1985)’ starring Matthew Modine as Louden Swain). Here is an example of how the wrestling conceptualization is used: Let’s say you are trying to resolve a mildly experienced instigation that you have experienced in your mind, and in this situation, you are trying to reason with the instigator. However, the problem with this situation is that the instigator seems to only want to reason with you while you are wrestling with the instigator! One obvious problem with trying to reason with such an identity is that, for certain instigations, even if you managed to create some sort of progress involving some sort of wrestling with the instigator, that progress may not be enough compared to the expectations of resolving that you are trying to achieve. Another problem that may not be so obvious to you is that, since the identity of the instigation is trying to ‘wrestle’ you, even for someone who is persistent to try to find a solution, many people without a technique will simply not even try to resolve such an instigation for many expectations, one obvious reason is because the wrestling instigation, based on the innocent person’s assumptions, will wear down their efforts to try to resolve it.

Before I continue explaining this ‘wrestling’ phenomena, I would like to say that one obvious usefulness from this idea for you is the results of your choice to upgrade this idea. If you have read the ideas I have typed in Amazon, then you may have already experienced that one of the benefits of reading these ideas is that you can easily upgrade them for your use. When I offer you this explanation, even though it is the best explanation within reason I can give you, it’s obvious benefit that I simply cannot give to you, but that you may develop on your own, so to speak, is your ability to upgrade the idea from time to time. Basically, over time, if you choose to, your intent will probably develop this idea, offering? you a more developed use of this idea to you. The reason I am mentioning this to you now is that many of you may compare the obvious words of this advice to concepts that you have already developed and made useful to you. If you do that, such a comparison may make these words look unacceptable to you. However, if you decide to develop these ideas, in time, these ideas may become more acceptable for you to use. Here is an example of how at first advice given was not acceptable, and yet because of it’s presented sincerity, and the capabilities of the person trying to use the advice, the advice in a short amount of time was made useful. The example is in episode 3.13 ‘Deja Q’ from series ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation(1990)’, episode watchable from Amazon Instant Video, and starting at 16 minutes and 14 seconds according to Amazon Instant Video, Data(Brent Spiner) asks Q(John de Lancie) the question quote-‘Can you recommend a way to counter the effect?’, and Q responds-‘Simple. Change the gravitational constant of the universe.'(You can also find the quote at web site imdb.com). At first, both Geordi and Data said to Q that the Enterprise and it’s crew lack the resourcefulness to change the gravitational constant of the universe. However, Geordi later invents an idea with the help of Q’s recommendation.

Going back to the wrestling situation, here is the solution I invented: Since the problem was that the instigator encourages you to resolve the instigation using a resisting identity, the solution I invented was to simply place the instigator in a different, more conducive environment of contemplation resolving. Even though this idea is probably over a year old, I think I invented 2 possible situations for the instigation to be evaluated upon in just one day, the same day. The 1st situation was invented from what I remember watching movie ‘Lean on Me(1989)’, starring Morgan Freeman as Principal Joe Clark. Just 10 or so minutes ago, I tried to look for the scene to introduce to you from Amazon Instant Video, but I could not find it. Instead, I offer you the scene that is available, according to Amazon Instant Video. It starts 41 minutes and 7 seconds into the movie, when Principal Clark suspends Mr. Darnell(Michael Beach). Soon after Clark suspended Mr. Darnell, Mr. Darnell in a fit of anger, flips Mr. Darnell’s desk. Although this helps explain the scene, this is not the scene I am referring to. According to memory, the scene is when Mr. Darnell comes back to Principal Clark’s office. You see him sitting down, and the scene implies that, after a conversation between the two, Mr. Darnell would be able to get his job back. Basically, you see Mr. Darnell sitting down, getting ready to talk to Principal Clark. And so, what I did to give a more conducive situation contemplationally is imagine the instigator sitting down and/or already sitting down to talk to Principal Clark. Here’s a question for the advice: ‘Why would that ‘Lean on Me’ scene work?’: Well, at least they’ll stop wrestling you! In imagination, the instigator/s you imagine sitting by Principal Clark’s desk are more likely to be in a conducive situation to help you resolve your experienced instigation. Now, when I used this ‘Lean on Me’ solution I invented, I thought that was the end of it, that I have found a solution for certain wrestling situations, and that’s that. However, the ‘Lean on Me’ solution for me lasted for only about 6 months.

[So, after the ‘Lean on Me’ idea no longer worked, I tried the 2nd idea. I invented the idea from an episode of ‘Nash Bridges’. The episode is called ‘Ripcord(1997)’, episode 3.6(‘Nash Bridges’ is available on DVD, but you can also rent the DVD from a DVD rental service that offers it, or maybe you can find the episode on youtube.com). In the episode, Joe Dominguez(Cheech Marin) participates in an airline experiment.

[It looks like that time again. I plan to continue explaining ‘The beginnings of bookmark use.’ next week.

8/12/2015

As of now, I looked over an hour trying to find something that would motivate me to continue explaining ‘The beginnings of bookmark use.’ to you, and since I did not find anything based on my original expectations, I have decided to use a new idea I plan to explain to you in a month or two, to allow me to use something that is currently available. The idea is based on contemplation effort managing. Using that idea, I have chosen for motivation, and this decision is based on what I have read in web site www.wikipedia.com, I have chosen movie ‘Star Trek Beyond’. According to wikipedia, the movie is scheduled to be released July 8, 2016. To me, it has an unappealing sense of contemplation effort identity associated to it for the purposes of it being used by me as motivation. To illustrate the experience, it is like episode 6.2 ‘A Slice of Life’ from series ‘The Facts of Life(1984)'(The episode is available from Amazon.com on DVD, or you may find the episode in web site youtube.com). From what I remember from the episode, when Jo(Nancy McKeon) started to sell more pizza but with less quality, even though members from a fraternity noticed the quality of the pizza not taste as good as the original orders they made from Jo, they still continued to eat the pizza. Refurbished for my motivation, of course, I choose to use the next Star Trek movie, even though how I sense it’s contemplation effort identity is not as acceptable for motivation as I would want it to be. [4:58 PM EST: I just returned from getting something to eat. Also, I want to say that the ‘contemplation effort’ idea I used for the ‘Star Trek’ motivation was just invented in the past week. I believe that such an idea may be very useful to you. However, I believe you should get a few more ideas first before I explain that one.

So, from where I left off last week, since the ‘Lean on Me’ idea no longer worked for me after 6 months, I started using the 2nd idea I invented. I used the Nash Bridges ‘Ripcord’ episode, the scene where Joe Dominguez was participating in an airline experiment. With the help of that scene, I imagined the concept of people for the purposes of vacation and recreation participating in an airline simulation. Basically, it’s a real airplane that people go into, but the airplane doesn’t fly. What happens is that the people who run the airplane set you up to stay there for a certain period of time, let’s say 6 hours, 12 hours, and longer, as if you are actually in an airplane flying to a certain destination. When I originally imagined it, the appeal to participate in such a thing was that the experience gives you all? of the pleasantries of flying in a commercial airplane, but without any of the worries. If you think about it, many people rely on airplane travel as part of their business routine. Maybe after a certain amount of years traveling in an airplane, some of them have developed some sort of appreciation for airplane travel. However, such an appreciation is inhibited by whatever they think are the discomforts of airplane travel. And so, to experience a certain appreciation without the discomfort, they may find that just being in an airplane that just gives them the simulation of flying may actually be an experience that they would want.

Well, anyway, what I think I did first was fill those airplane simulations up with instigators. They would all be there for recreational purposes, enjoying an airplane simulation. I would imagine them sitting in an airplane, and place them in some sort of negotiation situation. Of course, they don’t believe they are negotiating anything, since they are there to relax, for example. So, what I would do is just negotiate and discuss with them anyway, even though they are not in a negotiating situation. In other words, I would just imagine discussing with them anyway, even though they don’t hear me, and they don’t see me. The change in ambiance is relaxing enough to give the evaluation some progress.

Soon after that idea, I would just imagine a few of them just seemingly be there all of the sudden. For example, let’s say a businessman while he is at a business meeting all of a sudden finds himself in that airplane. He is startled, of course, but then he realizes he is not that far from where he lives or works, and that calms him down. Keep in mind that I am just imagining that happen. Of course, if you choose to use this idea, the airplane is always close to where the people live or work, and they could always leave and go back to what they were doing, so to speak.

That ‘putting people in the airplane’ idea didn’t last long either, and so what I did afterwards is what I believe to be the moment when I made an obvious improvement to how I use ad libbing. I call the moment ‘Reverse polarity’. I got the name from episode 3.17 ‘That Which Survives’ from series ‘Star Trek(1969)’. According to Amazon Instant Video, the reference begins 42 minutes and 16 seconds into the episode, when Spock(Leonard Nimoy) said to Scott(James Doohan) quote-‘Mr. Scott, reverse polarity on your magnetic probe.’ Of course, the reference is refurbished with inapproprieieties removed for advice. You look for the moment when Scott physically changes the polarity on his magnetic probe. Keep in mind that, at this point, I used the ‘Lean on Me’ idea and it lasted for 6 months and no longer works the way I want it to, and now the ‘put people in the airplane’ idea has also lost it’s effectiveness. And so, at this point, I decided to try something different. I imagined 2 instigators, 1 instigator to my left holding my arm, and one instigator to my right holding my right arm, forcing me to go into one of those airplanes. However, even though they have forced me to be in one of those airplanes, in the context of the idea, that is where I wanted to be! Basically, I have reversed the polarity of certain instigations to be in my favor, instigations that, for the purposes of explanation, would not occur at all in reality, simply because such instigations benefit the innocent person unusually well, in the context for the innocent person to learn and build his/her ideas for instigation. When I imagined 2 of those men forcing me to be in that airplane, that was my 1st obvious example of ‘ad libbing’ imagined instigations that have an obvious ‘reverse polarity’ identity in order to build more ideas.

[It’s about that time again for me. I plan to continue explaining ‘The beginnings of bookmark use.’ next week.

8/19/2015:

A day or so after typing in the 8/12/2015 revision, I imagined that I may have typed in something that some kids may have found disappointing and unacceptable according to their schools of thought. Here is the copy of the paragraph in question:

“Soon after that idea, I would just imagine a few of them just seemingly being there all of the sudden. For example, let’s say a businessman while he is at a business meeting all of a sudden finds himself in that airplane. He is startled, of course, but then he realizes he is not that far from where he lives or works, and that calms him down. Keep in mind that I am just imagining that happen. Of course, if you choose to use this idea, the airplane is always close to where the people live or work, and they could always leave and go back to what they were doing, so to speak.”

I am not trying to change the ‘schools of thought’ for those kids that believe that such an excerpt is unacceptable. I am just offering an explanation for it. You see, this line of reasonong I am offering to you was used over a year ago, maybe even over a year and a half ago. That means this idea was invented before the ‘composure’ and ‘articulation not the same’ bookmarks that are offered in this blog. That means that, if you used the ‘composure’ and ‘articulation’ bookmarks, you may have an expectation of me that was not met when you read that part about people ‘being there all of a sudden’. There is one example that I have found that may be used as a reference as to how you may have felt when you reaffirmed to yourself that people ‘being there all of a sudden’ was not acceptable to you. The example is in episode 5.19 ‘One More Day’s Light’ from series ‘Andromeda(2005)'(You can rent the episode from a DVD rental service that offers it, or you can buy the series from Amazon, if you choose to). The conversation is between Captain Hunt(Kevin Sorbo) and Trance Gemini(Laura Bertram) talking about the evacuation of Seefra planets, and here is the quote:

Trance: ‘Dylan, Seefra-5 is inhabited by Sectarians who refuse to accept or face the inevitable.

Captain Hunt: ‘Yes, that’s correct.’

Trance: ‘But the reality is that if innocents die, then this whole evacuation seems almost futile.’

Captain Hunt: ‘Come on. You don’t believe that.’

To reasonably sense the effectiveness of this reference, I recommend that you actually watch that scene from sci-fi series ‘Andromeda’. The quote alone is not enough. Anyway, if you watched that scene in the Andromeda episode, both responses from Captain Hunt and Trance, refurbished, of course, may represent the kids that find that ‘being there all of a sudden’ reference unacceptable. For example, Captain Hunt is started that Trance would say something like that, and Trance presents a resilience of belief that allows me to imagine the resilience of belief of the kids that find that ‘being there all of a sudden’ reference as unacceptable. I highly recommend that, if you want to understand more of what I am trying to explain, you watch that scene in the ‘Andromeda’ episode. Of course, that ‘Andromeda’ reference is refurbshed for advice.

Anyway, what I was trying to say before is that you are probably judging what I typed in based on the ‘composure’ and ‘articulation not the same’ bookmarks that I have typed in this blog, and what I am trying to say to you is that this idea was invented ‘before’ I invented the ‘composure’ and ‘articulation not the same’ bookmarks. That is why you may not have sensed the ‘composure’ and ‘articulation not the same’ bookmarks from that ‘being there all of a sudden’ statement. Of course, you still find that ‘being there all of a sudden’ meaning unacceptable. Therefore, I offer you another option: Based on my assumption that you are evaluating the actual words that I type in, I am now also presenting a second version of this advice, but with the ‘being there all of  a sudden’ paragraph removed. Instead of typing this whole thing all over again without that paragraph, I am just saying that the second version is offered with this 1st version. So, for those kids who find that ‘being there all of a sudden’ version unacceptable, maybe you can use the 2nd version instead, the version that I now offer you that does not have that ‘being there all of a sudden’ paragraph in it.

The reason I have now made available that 2nd version is because I believe that this ‘beginnings of bookmark use’ idea can be very useful to you, and that I don’t want minor misunderstandings to inhibit your ability to learn this idea, if you choose to.

[And now, I am at the part of this advice giving again to talk about what motivation I am using to help me continue with the explanation of this idea. The bad news is that I am not able to think of any DVD, Blu-Ray, or cable tv show that I can use for motivation. In it’s context, of course, I am very disappointed in that. Therefore, just a few minutes ago, I decided to use a different type of motivation. This is a motivation that I have discovered recently that I believe is being inhibited and disparaged by certain instigations. For example, I believe that many mild to moderate instigations fundamentally try to change an innocent person’s ability to judge instigators. One result of changing an innocent person’s ability to judge instigators is causing that innocent person to avoid and reject more people who do not meet certain expectations. Now, of course, the avoiding and rejecting is intentionally ambiguously stated. To make it more specific, let’s say that if you don’t meet a certain expectation for many job qualifications, the innocent person who is affected by such an instigation would avoid and reject people more for not meeting certain job qualifications. Of course, there are many job qualifications that have to be met, so I request that you bear with me for a little longer to see the point I am making. Now, here is when such instigations may adversely affect your sense of motivation: Suppose a person has the ability to create a job opportunity, and if you participate in such a job opportunity, there will be no problems with your salary or other basic resources. However, there is one problem you may identify: The person that can create such an opportunity, and that will also actively participate in such an opportunity, does not meet certain basic qualifications for the job he/she can create. Now, the job opportunities I am talking about is not like being a doctor or a lawyer, where the qualifications are absolutely needed. I’m talking about a person who can create a job opportunity, and the only obstacle that may prevent you from participating is that you believe that such a person who may create such a job opportunity simply does not meet certain basic requirements to have such a job. There are no problems with salary or resources with such a job.

So, therefore, because of certain instigations that you may have experienced, your sense of motivation is not used or is adversely inhibited because you believe that the person who is creating such an opportunity is not worthy to do so. There is the obvious example of knowing the person that you do not want to participate with. One reference is from movie ‘The Second Best Exotic Marigold Hotel(2015)’, refurbished for advice, of course, when Sonny Kapoor(Dev Patel) refuses to be partners with his formerly best friend Kushal(Shazad Latif). That is not the example I am trying to explain. If you choose to use this motivation example, than the example I am trying to explain is that, because you experienced instigations that caused you to avoid and reject people more, that instigation caused you to not see people who do not meet certain qualifications in an excessive context! For example, let’s say I show you the covers of 100 books, and all of these people do not meet certain qualifications, but the projects they could create will have no financial or resource problems. Because of certain instigations you experienced, you completely rejected all 100 books! You didn’t even bother opening those books! My advice to you is not to just go out there and work for such people. My advice is that certain instigations may have caused you to not use or to have an inhibited sense of motivation when such people are made known to you.

Here’s an example of me using this motivation example for this advice. Before using this advice, I was unable to find any DVD’s, Blu-rays, or cable tv shows to use as motivation. Now that I am using this new motivation advice, even though it’s just imagined, I am able to imagine now that there are other opportunities of motivation from DVD’s, Blu-rays, and cable tv shows However, those opportunities are associated with people that may not meet a preferred sense of qualification, but there are no problems with their project finances and resources. And so, now, in just imagination, I can now consider those other options. Of course, in reality, I still don’t have any DVD’s, Blu-rays, or cable tv shows to use as direct motivation. Instead, I have a new perspective of motivation, that probably will only last for today. Next week, I’ll have to find some other thing for motivation.

[Now, the power of ‘Reverse polarity.’ is the improvement of your technique, not results specifically. This idea is not something you should depend upon simply to help you have a solution. This is an idea that is used to improve how you make ideas that help you experience unavoidable instigation. To illustrate, here is the best example I can think of, refurbished for advice, of course, of the use of the definition of ‘ad libbing’ that I introduced to you earlier. The example is in episode 1.11 ‘A Great Personality’ from series ‘Cupid(1999)’. Since the tv series as far as I can tell is not available on DVD or Blu-ray yet, you can find it on youtube.com. Just type in ‘cupid a great personality’, and web site youtube.com should offer it to you. The reference starts 30 minutes and 1 second into the episode, according to the youtube video. In the illustration, Yvonne(Christine Taylor) is talking to Ken(Grant Heslov) while ice skating, and while they are ice skating, both Yvonne and Ken are ad libbing/imagining what certain people at the ice skating area are saying and doing. Here are the quotes:

(Yvonne identifies a father using his cell phone while ice skating with his young daughter)

Yvonne: ‘So, what do you make of that?(Yvonne points at the father ice skating with his young daughter, and then just imagines something about them). ‘Divorced dad spending quality time with his daughter. What could possibly be important enough to warrant the cell phone?’

As a response, Ken imitates the father, and says that the father is demanding a Barney tape for his daughter.

Another example of ad libbing in the episode follows. The point is that, even though the ad libbing is used for just entertainment purposes, both Yvonne and Ken made the ad libbing useful to them. Now, when you use ad libbing to help you build your own ideas, it is like the 2 examples in the ‘Cupid’ episode shown in youtube. You just imagine other people while you are in a safe context doing something that is useful to you. Keep in mind that, in the ‘Cupid’ episode, they are just imagining these evaluations. If Yvonne and Ken told that man with his young daughter what they said about him, that man could be offended! However, if you watch the ‘Cupid’ episode, you can see that both Yvonne and Ken are just imagining what that man ice skating with his young daughter are doing. What they both imagined is not used as a statement of fact. It is just used for entertainment.

Now, this is how I recommend you use ‘Reverse polarity.’ Basically, you maintain some sort of periodic sense of ad lib blame from other people. The purpose is that the periodic use of imagining other people blaming you for something, the intensity and type of blame is, of course, reasonable and of your choosing, is used for circulation. Based on my experience, if you periodically just imagine certain blames to come upon you, what will happen is that you will create epiphany-like ideas of your own! Based on my experience, these epiphany-like ideas will seem to just come to you. Soon after that, you will have more of an active contemplation choice as to what those ideas will be. Now, this is where that ‘Not need to be receptive for certain entitlements.’ idea comes in that I typed in earlier. If you decide to use this idea, you will be imagining a lot of blame coming upon you from other people. To help prepare you for that, I have given you the ‘Not need to be receptive for certain entitlements.’ idea to help you experience those blames.

Here is an example of how I use the periodically imagined blames from other people. When I use the publicly available buses for transportation, I look out the bus window and just openly imagine that the people that I perceive are instigating me for something. Sometimes, it’s for a specific instigation. Of course, I don’t always imagine that they are instigating me for something. And, of course, when I use this idea, I don’t present myself in a context that is intentionally encouraging others to instigate me. All I am doing is ad libbing/imagining it, like the way Yvonne and Ken did in the ‘Cupid’ episode. Also, when I am at work, I sometimes imagine that all of the people where I work are blaming me for a specific something, or they are all instigating me using a specific instigation. Of course, the context of that blame and/or instigation is reasonable, and benefits me! Now, since I have using this idea maybe for over a year and a half now, I have developed unique particulars of this idea. I believe that, over time, you too will develop unique particulars using this idea. Also, you may be able to incorporate ad libbing with other ideas that I will introduce you to.

If you choose to use such an ad libbing technique, over time, you may realize for yourself that the instigations that you imagine others impose upon you, but in your benefit, should be significant enough proof that it is unlikely to impossible that the mild to moderate instigations that you may experience would ever impose such instigations upon you. The reason why, in an oversimplified way, is that certain instigations that you have imagined would just benefit you too much if an instigator would impose such instigations upon you. Also, you are using the instigations that you may choose to imagine to build ideas for yourself. I don’t realistically see instigations conveniently made available to you in such a context that they would help you build specific ideas for yourself. For example, I don’t see instigations imposed upon you in the same context as the lab equipment was made available to you in the school you attend or attended.

[I think I’ll stop now and continue next week. Next week, I plan to begin the explanation of the concept of ‘Shuffling bookmarks.’ to you.

8/26/2015:

Before I begin explaining ‘Shuffling bookmarks.’, I was thinking it over the past week about giving you a few specific examples for ‘Reverse polarity.’ The problem, so to speak, is that many of you have recently read and used bookmark ‘Articulation not the same as impression of interjection of grievance.’, a bookmark I offered you in this blog a few weeks ago. The problem is that, using the definition from web site www.wikipedia.com, the ‘Articulation not the same.’ bookmark is a ‘sleeper hit’. According to wikipedia, ‘sleeper hit’ is a term used in the entertainment industry for a film that plays successfully for a long period and becomes a big success, despite having relatively little promotion or lacking a successful opening. The point is that I realized after the fact that the epiphany effect for bookmark ‘Articulation not the same.’, based on my experience, comes back in different forms. For example, even though it’s been a few weeks already, I imagined a boy saying outloud so that his sister can hear the words ‘Articulation not the same.’ His sister said ‘Why did you say that?(Both sister and brother have read the idea)’, and the boy said smiling, ‘I don’t know.'(I also know that it’s none of my business to know that, even though I just imagined it. I am not trying to re-purpose the kid’s conversation to each other). Anyway, because it is likely that both kids and adults that have chosen to use the ‘Articulation..’ idea are both still experiencing some sort of epiphany from it, that means you may compare the results of your ‘Articulation’ experience with the examples I give you for bookmark ‘Reverse polarity.’, and that means that the epiphany results for the ‘Reverse polarity.’ examples won’t last as long as they would if you did not learn the ‘Articulation not the same.’ idea first.

Well, anyway, here are the examples for ‘Reverse polarity.’: The 1st example’s reference is the 1st example that I can remember for using ‘Reverse polarity.’, and it’s an example I’m still using now and then. The example is from a digital comic book from web site www.comixology.com called Batman/Superman(2013) #1: Annual. Even though the comic book is only about 5 dollars, you don’t have to buy it. The comic book provides a free preview, and the preview has the reference I am referring to. To find it, just go to www.comixology.com, type in ‘batman superman’ in the ‘search’ engine, click the ‘Batman/Superman(2013)’ series, and the digital comic book is located between issue #8 and #9 of the series. When you click the Annual, you go to another internet page that has the words ‘See what’s inside’ underneath the picture cover of the comic book. Click that, and you see 4 images vertically lined up. The reference is the 3rd image going down. Click the 3rd image, and Batman and Superman are talking about a prisoner in the Phantom Zone. The reference is basically from the last image from that page, when Batman says to Superman quote-‘No. I’m just surprised you can’t, Clark.’, and Superman says-‘Hmp.’, which I believe is an indication that Superman is experiencing a variety of emotions, all those emotions related to Superman being insulted and offended by what Batman had said, but in it’s non-violent context, of course. If the reference is no longer there for free, the digital comic book only costs about 5 dollars. Of course, with inapproprieities removed and in relation to advice, you can read the rest of that page to understand what they are talking about. However, that quote is what will be used in the ‘Reverse polarity.’ example I am giving you.

And so, here is how I recommend you use the ‘Batman/Superman #1: Annual’ quote: One possible recommendation is to go to a public restaurant that allows you to see a lot of public transportation traffic. For example, I eat at a place that has both bus and train transportation traffic. The restaurant has a window that lets you see people go back and forth somewhat. Of course, you have bought something from that restaurant that allows you to sit there. As you see the people walk back and forth, reasonably imagine/ad lib that they are all individually Batman, from older kids to adults, and they are individually saying the words from the comic book quote-‘I’m just surprised you can’t, Clark.’, and then you, just reasonably imagining that you are Superman, just like the comic book, would think the words quote-‘Hmp.’, which means that you are reasonably offended by what Batman said to you. Now, the question I present as part of the advice is ‘How is this useful?’ When you imagine this, you do so in a context that benefits you. For example, imagine the scenario that it is unlikely that an instigator would instigate you in such a manner, because the instigation would benefit you too much. In other words, why would an instigator present himself/herself as Batman to you, and say the words ‘I’m just surprised you can’t, Clark.’ as an instigation? Of course, again, when you consider such a possibility, you also use instigations that you can reasonably consider. I still use this idea now, but I’d like to also believe that I am not using it like I did the 1st few months of using it.

I also recommend using the ‘Batman/Superman’ idea when you are sitting in a public bus. For example, when I am sitting in a public bus, I have the option of imagining all of the people in the bus, except the bus driver, being Batman from that comic book, and saying the words ‘I’m just surprised you can’t, Clark.’, and then I would imagine being genuinely reasonably offended by what they said to me. Of course, the words are meant to empower me instead. I also look at the people outside of the bus. Usually, they’re standing or walking on the sidewalks that the bus passes by. I would imagine them being Batman saying those words, and then I would imagine being insulted and offended by Batman again. Well, anyway, that’s what I used to do quite a bit in the beginning. Notice that, in both the restaurant and bus examples, I was sitting down when I was imagining it. Of course, you just use this recommendation in a safe, reasonable context. Also, when you are doing this, you’re not supposed to show others that you are doing it. After all, you are only imagining it. Well, of course, you you are imagining being upset or offended, you’re face may respond a little to that anger. However, I believe that, with a little practice, you should be able to present a facial expression that can both respond to your imagined anger, and be normal for others to see.

I have changed my mind, and have decided to just give you the ‘Batman/Superman’ example. Later, as I introduce new bookmarks to you, I also plan to give you examples of ‘Reverse polarity.’ for certain future bookmarks.
Sildigra ,a generic version of levitra from canada .Sildigra 50mg is used for treatment of patients suffering from erectile dysfunction. Kamagra, an excellent treatment for erectile dysfunction is a serious health issue which can ruin cialis 40 mg your sexual life. http://amerikabulteni.com/2012/01/22/ve-46nci-super-bowl-finali-ezeli-rekabete-sahne-olacak-boston-new-york/ cialis generic usa To eradicate stress and treat sexual troubles, millions of individuals are moving to yoga. This medicine has to be taken amalgamated with well maintained calorie managed diet which is found rich in fruits & vegetables. viagra sample overnight
Shuffling bookmarks:

I shall begin this advice with the motivation I have prepared already a few days ago. I already used the motivation for this idea, but I will explain it now, in case you may find it useful. Before I continue explaining this idea, the motivation part of this idea that I believe may be useful to you is in the premise that, even though you may have seen something on TV or watched it in a movie, that doesn’t necessarily mean that you will use it. It is my belief that many of the adults may discover that they have heard of seen something like this idea before, but the question is not whether you have heard or seen it before. The question is:-‘Are you using such an idea?’ Now, this postulate may sound like you can just add it to any other idea, so to speak, but the reason I am typing this is because I believe that many people, even though they have heard or seen such an idea before, are not really using the idea in regards to certain experienced mild to moderate instigations. And so, to help you use this idea, if you choose to, I am trying to bring it to your attention.

The idea begins from a scene in the sci-fi series ‘Lexx(1997)’. I think it was a deleted scene shown from it’s DVD collection. The scene involves Stanley Tweedle(Brian Downey) talking to the sentient ship called ‘Lexx’. They were just recently attacked by robot arms, and some of those robot arms managed to get into the Lexx. However, soon after the attack, the robot arms disappeared, and Mr. Tweedle asked Lexx ‘Where did they go?’, and the Lexx said, according to my memory, quote-‘They were resorbed.’ The Lexx absorbed the robot arms. Anyway, the point is that I refurbished the ‘Lexx’ reference, and it allowed me to imagine that so many different schools of thought coexist in America, and if you look at the buildings that people coexist in, such as private schools and buildings tourists often visit, the insides of those buildings used for this example is surprisingly clean.

The ‘Lexx’ reference leads to episode ‘Doctor Who: Last Christmas(2014)’. It was during the 3rd time I was watching just the beginning of that episode, when Clara Oswald(Jenna Coleman) was trying to accept that the person she was talking to was Santa Claus. It was at the beginning of the episode. That’s the moment when I imagined how people would create certain conceptualized goals in their minds, but when they use such goals with certain agendas that they have chosen to participate in, those conceptualized goals would disappear. And so, during the beginning of that ‘Doctor Who’ episode, I imagined the remote control I was using to be thrown/added to certain test imagined goals(basically, I would just throw the remote control on something nearby), and sure enough, the remote control disappeared, in imagination of course. After that, I postulated that one of the main reasons that many women in America have memorabilias(mementos; souvenirs) is so that they can keep the identities of certain conceptualized goals, since they believe that such goals tend to get changed, or even disappear, when they are mixed with other agendas.

And so, what is the point to the Lexx/Doctor Who example? less than 10 years ago, I watched the preview, not the movie, of the movie ‘Bratz(2007)’, and in the preview, 4 best friends for a moment were fighting each other as they were participating in a separate social category. Soon after the fight, they realized what had happened, and chose not to do it again. My point is that I believe many people are experiencing some sort of mild disappointment when their conceptualized goals are not manifesting in the participations that they choose to have, and life goes on. In other words, I don’t think they get that ‘Bratz’ epiphany, like those girls experienced in that movie. What I call a ‘solution’ that I have invented is not a solution, but instead it is what I think is more of a reasonable way to manage the purpose of your conceptualized goals, is to just remember what your conceptualized goals are, knowing that you may not recognize those goals in the agendas you choose to participate in. Here’s an example that might show how that may benefit you. I imagined, refurbished with inapproprieities removed, of course, that I visited Michael(Tom Wisdom) from series ‘Dominion(2014)’ in his alternate reality, but recently, in the year 2015, not during the events of that TV show. During our conversation, Michael is talking about the disappointments that mankind has shown him from their businesses and corporations. In response, I pointed out to Michael how many of the women have memorabilias that manifest their true intent, even though such an intent is changed and even removed when mixed in with their chosen agendas(Of course, it is implied that the example from the women can be extrapolated for the men). And then I said to Michael quote-‘People are not clones of you.’, since Michael believes himself to be an archangel, and believes to be using an archangel mentality. Also, if you watched the tv show ‘Dominion’, with the inapproprieities removed, of course, you may easily notice that the only conversations that Michael seem to have with Alex Lannen(Christopher Egen) are candid(frank; outspoken; open and sincere; straightforward) ones.

The point of the ‘Dominion’ reference is to show you that being able to manage better what your conceptualized goals are, even as they disappear on you in your chosen participations, can be useful to you.

[Well, it looks like I have underestimated how much time I have available for this list. I think it’s because of the ‘Batman/Superman’ example I chose to type in. Anyway, I plan to start explaining ‘Shuffling bookmarks.’ next week.

9/2/2015:

Pinch justify:

I know I said that I planned to start explaining ‘Shuffling bookmarks.’ now, but I just invented a bookmark yesterday called ‘Pinch justify.’, and I believe I can give you an explanation of the idea that you may find useful. If you liked bookmark ‘Articulation not the same.’ that I explained in a previous list in this blog, then you may also find useful bookmark ‘Pinch justify.’ One difference between the 2 bookmarks is that ‘Pinch justify.’ is more direct, more specific, than bookmark ‘Articulation not the same.’ In fact, I anticipate that, if you choose to use bookmark ‘Pinch justify.’, your sense of contemplation use at first may probably go through a sense of obvious change.

I have imagined witnessing, within reason, of course, your initial change in contemplation use, as a courtesy for you to use. Have you ever heard of the term ‘wheelhouse’? I think it is a term I discovered from an episode of tv series ‘Elementary(2012+)’, the detective show that stars Lucy Liu and Jonny Lee Miller. If you choose to use bookmark ‘Pinch justify’ at first, it may be as if you are building a new wheelhouse for yourself. The best example I can think of, even though it is refubished with inapproprieities removed, of course, it’s original form still has some obvious bad language. Because of it’s obvious bad language, if you can’t use the reference, then don’t. However, the refurbished reference does not need the bad language to make it’s point. The reference is from movie ‘Die Hard: With a Vengeance(1995)’. According to Amazon Instant Video, the reference starts at 1:11:06 into the movie, when Zeus Carver(Samuel L. Jackson) asks John McClane(Bruce Willis) quote-‘What was in the room?’, and McClane shows Mr. Carver the bar of gold that was on the floor. The reference ends before the next scene in the movie is shown. So, basically, and it’s just a recommendation that you can refurbish, I represent John McClane and you represent Zeus Carver responding to that bar of gold that I just introduced to you. Of course, I am aware that you want to take that bar of gold with you to the next place that we plan to go to. Like I said, it’s just a refurbished reference that you could change around, in relation to advice, of course.

And so, here is how the idea starts: About a week ago, I invented bookmark ‘Why now?’ For example, an instigator imposes upon you the inclination to ponder a notion that is unnecessary to ponder. The reason you may have chosen to think about such a notion is because of the circumstance you were experiencing at the time you may have experienced such an instigation. For example, you are in a public bus, and someone in the bus is playing on the radio a news broadcast that may be mildly upsetting to you. While you are listening to that news broadcast, an instigator in that bus imposes an instigation that causes you to ponder a notion that is not only associated with that news broadcast, but the manner in which you ponder such a notion is also dictated by the instigation you have experienced. Now, if you use this ‘Why now?’ idea, if you are in another bus ride, and the situation happens again, instead of pondering the notion imposed by the instigator, you can instead think to yourself ‘Why now? Why do I have to address such a notion?’ As one possible solution, if you already know that the notion imposed upon you to address is unnecessary to address, you can choose to just see such a notion as a reference only, not something that needs a certain involved scrutiny.

Another example of using ‘Why now?’ is when you are watching television for entertainment purposes, and there is a moment in that tv show you are watching that causes you to recall a certain mild to moderate instigation that you have experienced in the past, an instigation that causes you to interact in a bothersome context such a notion. Now, if you choose to use this idea, instead of being in a bothersome mood when you watch tv, you can instead think to yourself ‘Why now? Why do I have to address such a notion, when I’m just watching tv?’

Well anyway, the reason I am bringing to your attention bookmark ‘Why now?’ is because ‘Pinch justify.’ is a more specific category use of bookmark ‘Why now?’ I invented ‘Pinch justify.’ yesterday. Basically, bookmark ‘Pinch justify.’ is used to identify an instigation that intends to overemphasize your sense of justification in order for you to have a misled overemphasized sense of justification response. The best example I can think of right now for this blog involving a temporary overemphasized sense of justification is in episode 3.13 ‘Deja Q’ from series ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation(1990)’. According to Amazon Instant Video, the reference begins 9 minutes and 24 seconds into the episode, when Q(John de Lancie) calls Lieutenant Worf(Michael Dorn) a Romulan. Worf responds by stopping his walk momentarily, before he leaves the room. Now, that is just a temporarily overemphasized sense of justification. When you experience a ‘Pinch justify.’, your overemphasized justification’s response is also being misled by the instigation. One example of a ‘Pinch justify.’ is what I call an ‘air ball’. According to web site dictionary.com, an ‘air ball’ in reference to basketball, is ‘a missed shot that fails to touch the rim, net, or backboard.’. For example, the justification you experience in regards to such an instigation is understandable, but how you go about resolving such a justification is being misled, like an ‘air ball’ in basketball.

The solution I recommend for you to avoid this ‘air ball’ effect is to simply check if the instigation you are experiencing is trying to cause you to have an overemphasized sense of justification, and if it is, to check if that attempt at overemphasized justification is being misled. To help you more objectively identify such an instigation, I invented what I call a ‘variation’ bookmark. It’s an addendum/word that you can add to other bookmarks to change the bookmark’s purpose. The variation bookmark I am referring to is the word ‘pinch’. Basically, if you choose to use the idea, you’re going to use a conceptually imagined sense of pinching to allow yourself to more objectively identify an instigation trying to overemphasize your sense of justification, and of course try to mislead your overemphasized sense of justification as well. The only reference I can think of that illustrates a pinch, the reference refurbished with inapproprieities removed, of course, is found in movie ‘Cruel Intentions 2(2000)’. Keep in mind that the movie has mature themes in it. Although I am not using those mature themes in this advice, if you cannot use the movie because of those mature themes, then don’t. According to Amazon Instant Video, the reference is located 31 minutes and 21 seconds into the movie. Kathryn Merteuil(Amy Adams) pinches Cherie Claymon(Keri Lynn Pratt). Miss Claymon says ‘Ouch!’ in response to the pinch, Kathryn says to Miss Claymon-‘Want some more?’, and Miss Claymon says ‘No.!’ So, you use that moment as a reference, and conceptualize it differently. Here’s my recommendation: Let’s say you’re sitting down in a bus. When you look outside, imagine Cherie Claymon from the movie puckering up her lips as she is being pinched by Kathryn Merteuil. So, even though Cherie Claymon is experiencing some discomfort as she is being pinched by Kathryn, her lips are puckered, meaning that she looks like she is sticking her lips out and she wants to kiss someone. Keep in mind that her lips are sticking out as she is being pinched by Kathryn. Cherie is wearing a shirt with no sleeves so that you can see her arm being pinched by Kathryn, and while Kathryn is pinching Cherie, Kathryn is showing her teeth, as if she is angry at Cherie. So, while you are sitting in the bus, within reason, you can just imagine those 2 women standing on a sidewalk somewhere, a sidewalk that you can see from the bus window, and of course as you see those 2 women, one is pinching the other. Now, that’s the basic image of it. What you will do now with that image is ‘zoom in’ using your imagination on the area where Kathryn’s hand is pinching Cherie’s arm, and what you will do, if you choose to, is shake Kathryn’s hand as it is pinching Cherie’s arm, and reasonably imagine what that pinching feeling feels like to you. That feeling is what you will use as an indicator to allow yourself to more objectively identify an instigation that is trying to overemphasize your sense of justification. And that is what I call a ‘Pinch justify.’

And so, here is a question for the pinching illustration:-‘Why those two women?’ First, it’s the only pinching illustration idea I can think of. And second, since this advice is supposed to be standard demographic advice for many schools of thought(that’s like watching the weather channel), I believe that having a tv show or movie reference, for example, gives the illustration use a more reliable foundation to work with. Keep in mind that when you use the pinching illustration, it’s based on the characters those two actresses portrayed in the movie, not the actresses themselves. Also, although imagining Cherie puckering her lips as she is being pinched in the arm by Kathryn may seem comical, the reason I made them look that way is to hopefully allow you to be able to use the idea. For example, before many of you have chosen to use this idea, how many times before using this idea have you imagined something like this before? Before I finish this pinching illustration explanation, I’d like to say that, in this list, I will be making more examples of ‘Pinch justify.’ in the ‘Shuffling bookmarks’ idea, but with different variations other than ‘Pinch.’ For example, I can change ‘Pinch justify.’ into ‘Pull justify.’, ‘Snap justify.’, ‘Slap justify.’, ‘Smack justify.’, and so on.

[I plan to finally start the explanation for ‘Shuffling bookmarks.’ next week.

I forgot to mention that, when you use this idea, keep in mind that you are using it as a diagnostic. Although I do not have time right now to explain this, but an instigator may discourage your sense of using ideas that are meant to help you more tenably experience instigation. Here’s a question that you may choose to use to reference yourself:-‘How does an instigator know that I am using this idea?’ Let me try to answer that question with another question: ‘How is it that you are so calmly responding to instigation?’

I plan to type in more advice next week.

9/9/2015:

Shuffling bookmarks:

First, I am going to type in the reference for bookmark ‘Marry the two.’. This bookmark is part the explanation for ‘Shuffling bookmarks.’ The reference is in episode 4.9 ‘The Sting’ from tv series ‘MI-5(Spooks)(2005)’. According to Amazon Instant Video, the reference starts 20 minutes and 56 seconds into the episode. Here is a quote from the reference:

Colin Wells(Rory MacGregor):-“It’s been chewing up his bank details, credit cards, travel movements, college classmates and tutor lists, mobile and cell positioning, NHS files.”

Adam Carter(Rupert Penry-Jones):-“Won’t the Americans have done this?”

Colin:-“Yes, but we have access to information that they don’t have. By marrying the two, we can find new links that they won’t.”

[And so, I’ll begin by explaining what a bookmark is made of. A bookmark is basically made of 3 parts, 1): some sort of word or catch phrase to help you reference the meaning when you experience instigation, 2): the explanation, and 3): although not required, it usually has a reference, such as a moment from a tv show or movie, something used to give a foundation for the idea, something to help illustrate the idea’s point. [‘Shuffling bookmarks’ is when you are combining and separating individual bookmarks in order to find a bookmark that could be used effectively upon the instigation that you have experienced. As of now, the requirements recommended to use the idea of ‘shuffling bookmarks’ is conveniently located in this blog. The 2 basic requirements are to know the ‘composure’ and ‘articulation not the same’ bookmarks that I have already introduced to you. Of course, you can also read this entire blog to help you use ‘shuffling bookmarks.’ After all, it is my opinion that this blog is still relatively new in development, from my perspective.

‘Marry the two.’ is a reference, refurbished for advice, that can illustrate to you an example that shows you the value of grouping different bookmarks together. In the MI-5 example I typed in, Colin said quote-“By marrying the two, we can find new links that they won’t.” I am using the ‘MI-5’ example to show you that, even though you know what the bookmarks mean, and you think that they have no relevant data as bookmarks individually for the specific instigation you have experienced, if you start grouping different bookmarks together, if you start ‘marrying the two’, so to speak, than you may be able to create new, useful information that wasn’t there before.

One easy way to create different bookmarks from let’s say your favorite bookmark, a bookmark that you would want to use, even though it may not be effective on the instigation you have experienced, is to add addendums to it. ‘Addendums’ can be adjectives, but basically I define ‘addendums’ as words that you can just add to bookmarks in general that can change it’s purpose easily. For example, an addendum can change a bookmark’s intensity, sequence, texture, and so on. Here are some addendums that I used to use and still use actively: Able, offer, agree, eager, want, snap, sting, pinch, pull, fast, speed, add, slap, smack. Those are the addendums that I can think of right now. Also, even though you may not see it as such, as you are trying to invent a bookmark that works on the instigation, you are also addressing different characteristics of that experience. For example, in episode 3.2 ‘The Ensigns of Command’ from series ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation(1989)’, according to Amazon Instant Video, 27 minutes and 30 seconds into the episode, Deanna Troi(Marina Sirtis) is showing a cup to Picard(Patrick Stewart), and then she says the word ‘S’marith’, and then she asks Picard ‘What did I just say?’ Picard says ‘Cup?’-‘Glass?’, and Deanna says to Picard-‘Are you sure? I may have meant liquid, clear, brown, hot.’ [The point is that, as you are ‘shuffling bookmarks’ to find a bookmark that would work for the instigation, you are also already using many bookmarks to address certain characteristics of that experienced instigation! However, since you have a preference of experience, you will continue to shuffle more bookmarks until you find a solution that is acceptable to you. To illustrate, if you choose to, for minor instigations, of course, you can use the ‘S’marith’ example from Star Trek. You can think of the other characteristics of the experienced instigation like determining what ‘S’marith’ means. Did she say cup?, glass?, or maybe it was liquid, clear, brown, hot? As an example of ‘shuffling bookmarks’, let’s use bookmark ‘Pinch justify.’, a bookmark that I had explained yesterday. Instead of ‘Pinch justify.’, you can change the word ‘pinch’ to ‘sting’, ‘slap’, ‘smack’, or ‘snap’. Instead of using the ‘pinch’ example, you can change the intensity of the meaning by switching the addendum ‘pinch’ to another word that represents a different intensity. For example, ‘sting’ can represent a sting that you may feel when you place a rubber band around your wrist, you pull back on the rubber band, and you let the rubber band hit your skin. That feeling may represent a ‘sting'(this is just an example. You don’t have to use it literally). ‘Snap’ could represent the intensity of snapping your fingers, ‘Smack’ may represent when you clap your hands. OK, even though you may not find those explanations adequate, you may still be able to use those explanations to help you sense the different intensities associated with such words.

[Although I did not type much in today, after I finish explaining ‘Shuffling bookmarks’, which should be by next week, I am going to read over this list, and then finally start making new, individual lists again. I could be done with the explanation already, and all I have to do next week is read over this list and add it’s disclaimer.

9/16/2015:

Testy:

Before I finally finish this list, which I hope will be today, I want to add one more idea. I call the bookmark ‘Testy.’ I looked in web site www.dictionary.com, and I did not find the definition I was looking for. I also used the search engine google.com. And so, I’ll try to explain it myself. ‘Testy.’ means-‘to test the foundation of someone’. The definition of ”Testy.’ as a bookmark is-‘An instigator may inappropriately encourage you to test the foundations of others. Here’s an example. In episode 1.4 ‘Aliens of London’ from series ‘Doctor Who(2006)’, 30 minutes and 38 seconds into the episode according to Amazon Instant Video, here is a quote:

Mickey Smith(Noel Clarke):-‘So, what’re you doing down there?’

The Doctor(Christopher Eccleston):-‘Rickey.’

Mickey Smith:-‘Mickey.’

The Doctor:-‘Rickey, If I was to tell you what I was doing to the controls of my frankly magnificent time ship, would you even begin to understand?’

Mickey Smith:-‘Well, I suppose not…’

The Doctor:-‘Well, shut it, then.’

[When an instigator improperly imposes a sense of testy behavior upon an innocent person, it is my belief that if he/she experiences such testy behavior long enough, that innocent person, although not in the form of an instigation, may also impose upon others a sense of testy behavior. It is my belief that many people in America already use some sort of testy behavior in one form or another, a behavior that they have created because of instigations they have experienced in the past. As I was typing this in, I have chosen to try to be more tolerant of such behavior. However, even though many people have chosen to integrate a sense of imposing testy behavior upon others, there is a possible caution, when such behavior is learned from and because of instigation. Testy behavior imposed upon others may discourage those who are experiencing testy behavior from learning and communicating with others. Although I have only recently been actively using the word ‘testy’ to identify such an instigation, it is also my belief that, as I was typing in ideas for others to read, from web site amazon.com to this blog, even though I did not call it that at the time, in order to help others to use such advice, I have been learning to avoid being unnecessarily testy to those that may read such advice. So, I guess you may choose an evaluation that may say that, for certain participations, I am the exception to the rule, since I have been avoiding being unnecessarily testy to others without even calling it ‘testy’! Just seconds ago, I thought of another example of ‘testy’. The example is from episode 7.20 ‘Journey’s End’, 9 minutes and 54 seconds into the episode according to Amazon Instant Video, from series ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation(1994)’, when Geordi(LeVar Burton) wanted to show Wesley(Wil Wheaton) something that he created. Here is a quote:

Geordi:-‘I don’t know what’s gotten into you.’

Wesley:-‘Do you want my help or not?’

Geordi:-‘With this attitude, absolutely not. You’re dismissed.’

Since this is by intent standard demographic advice, I’m using the reasonable assumption that not everyone that is reading these ideas is a certified teacher. My point is that, if you are testy with others, you may be discouraging them to communicate in a context that is within their means to communicate. You may also be inhibiting their sense of learning, their sense of motivation. My recommendation is that you take into consideration that nobody knows everything, and that, if you choose to, you should give people a little latitude to allow others to communicate and learn, with the possible fact that others may still exhibit testy behavior. So, for example, one interpretation of this advice is that you simply do both: if you choose to, you use testy behavior, ‘and’ you try to give a little latitude to others that allows them to learn and communicate.

[Violence, viewer discretion for tv series ‘Doctor Who’, tv series ‘Star Trek: The Next Generation’, tv series ‘Star Trek: The Original Series(1969)’, tv series ‘Nash Bridges’, TV sci-fi series ‘Andromeda’, rated R discretion for movie ‘Vision Quest’, rated PG-13 discretion for movie ‘Lean on Me’, violence and viewer discretion for sci-fi series ‘Lexx’, TV sci-fi series ‘Dominion’, tv series ‘MI-5’, rated PG discretion for movie ‘The Second Best Exotic Marigold Hotel’, rated R viewer discretion for movie ‘Cruel Intentions 2’, violence and viewer discretion for comic book series ‘Batman/Superman’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, movie, and comic book. [Use mental bookmarks ‘Reverse polarity.’, ‘Why now?’, ‘Pinch justify.’, ‘Shuffling bookmarks.’, ‘Marry the two.’, and ‘Testy.’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

7/29/15

Not need to be receptive for certain entitlements:

Before I begin explaining ‘the beginnings of bookmark use’ to you, there is an aspect of that explanation that I think may be better for you to have if I explain it now. If I explain that aspect now, I think that the explanation for ‘the beginnings of bookmark use’ would have more continuity for you to understand. Therefore, I will explain that aspect now. It is called ‘Not need to be receptive for certain entitlements.’ You see, part of using ‘the beginnings of bookmark use’ involves ad libbing. According to www.dictionary.com, the noun definition of ad lib means ‘something improvised in speech, music, etc.’

This is the definition of ‘ad lib’ that I invented for this advice:- The 1st definition I used that I can remember is when you look at other people from a safe, respectful distance and you imagine them having some sort of conversation. Of course, the conversation is completely imagined. Now, the use of ad libbing for these ideas becomes more involved, but the beginning use is still the same. The concepts that you may choose to create for other people to use are still completely imagined. This is one part of ‘the beginnings of bookmark use’, that you imagine people doing something in a reasonable context to help you build your own ideas. Now, part of using this ad libbing is that you may choose to associate certain concepts of blame to others, and of course, the blame is just imagined. For example, when you are in a bus, and one person in the bus instigates you, the mild to moderate instigation may be associated with a specific blame from the instigator. One way to lesson the effects of that instigation is to associate that blame with not only just the instigator, but within reason of course, with everyone in the bus. That way, the instigator’s focus of blame upon him/herself may be lessened, or even disabled, if the association is with other people. Of course, it would be an aspect of blame that you can reasonably associate with others without adding any excess inapproprieity upon yourself. Now, the reason I am saying this is because, even though the blame is imagined, it is still an idea used because of an instigation, which means that you may be using the idea because you need to use it, which means that the instigation may be bothering you contemplationally. Such an instigation may create some sort of diminishing or waning of your chosen perspective. And so, to help compensate for the waning of your chosen perspective and to help you to have the ability to ad lib, I invented the concept called ‘Not need to be receptive for certain entitlements’.  The best reference I can think of as a starting reference use for ‘Not need to be receptive for certain entitlements.’ is in episode 3.10 ‘Sabrina and the Beast(1998)’ from series ‘Sabrina, the Teenage Witch’, episode watchable from Amazon Instant Video. Now, before I continue, I want to say that it is not my intent to change your school of thought with this reference. The reference use is designed by intent to help you understand and use the ‘not need to be receptive for certain entitlements’ idea. That said, I continue with the explanation. Of course, you don’t have to watch the whole episode. The 1st reference begins about 7 minutes into the episode, when Cousin Susie(Sonje Fortag) arrives. Notice that Sabrina(Melissa Joan Hart) is making TV obvious gestures to avoid interacting with Cousin Susie because of Cousin Susie’s appearance, such as cringing, squirming, and avoiding when interacting with Cousin Susie. Now, to be fair, since Sabrina is still learning to be a witch, Sabrina did expect Cousin Susie to have some sort of magical presentation associated with her appearance. That is one obvious reason why Sabrina was not able to present a preferred response. According to Sabrina, Cousin Susie’s appearance did not have an adequate amount of magical accomodation, and magical accomodation is something Sabrina simply expects to be there. Here is a conversation quote from Sabrina and Cousin Susie. Notice that Sabrina is trying to say the ‘right’ thing, but she lacks a certain understanding as to how to react to Cousin Susie’s appearance. According to Amazon Instant Video, the quote begins 8 minutes and 16 seconds into the episode:

Cousin Susie:-‘Sabrina, do you have a problem with the way I look?’

Sabrina:-‘No, you’re a very nice wart..Woman!’

Cousin Susie:-‘Beauty is very important to you, isn’t it?’

Shilajit is an elixir of good health and age is viagra overnight delivery advised. This is the reason why in your younger days you may also come across with problems. viagra in uk Don’t expect to sildenafil generic from canada get two extra inches in a few weeks. So what are you waiting for? Once you start considering all these factors, you will know why it is important to take into account all these factors so that it becomes easier for you to some extent. generic viagra wholesale Sabrina:-‘No, I’m just not looking at you because I’m being coy.’

One more reference is located  11 minutes and 48 seconds into the episode, after Zelda Spellman(Beth Broderick) said quote-‘Right now, she’s(Cousin Susie) feeding homeless witches.’ That’s when you see a scene of Cousin Susie holding a baby, and a light is shining upon her.

After typing all of that in, here is the definition of ‘Not need to be receptive for certain entitlements’. Basically, people are entitled to certain things without needing to be receptive to what they are entitled to have. For example, using the ‘Sabrina’ episode, and since we are living in America(for those of you that are), I believe that America is already a mix of different cultures and beliefs. For the sake of illustration, let’s say the Christmas lights on a Christmas tree represents other cultures and beliefs that are not your own, within reason, of course, and they all have a different appreciation of what beauty is. Now, even though they may present to you a different example of what beauty is, even though your own personal preferred sense of what beauty is does not agree with their presented example of beauty, they are still entitled to that example of beauty, even though you are not receptive to it. For example, let’s say you agree with Sabrina, that Cousin Susie is not attractive based on your preferred perspective. However, to certain other cultures and beliefs, she is attractive. Therefore, Cousin Susie is entitled to those acknowledgements that certain other cultures and beliefs find her attractive, even though based on your preferred perspective, you are not receptive to finding Cousin Susie attractive.

Now, this may all seem a bit wordy now, but if you have ever experienced mild to moderate instigation, especially when it’s done by a stranger, such as a stranger that you see while using public transportation, then you may notice that during the effects of the instigation, your sense of what that instigator is entitled to have may be dulled. For example, have you ever leaned upon the courtesies of a situation to allow a person who has instigated you to continue participating in that situation? More specifically, you would contemplationally recall to yourself the courtesy involved in a participation that may allow a person who has instigated you to continue participating in that situation. Well, with this idea, you may now have an extra option to supplement or even replace such a situation. Instead on relying on that courtesy, you may instead contemplationally say to yourself ‘Not need to be receptive for certain entitlements.’, meaning that the person that presented a minor instigation to you is entitled to certain things, even though that person is not receptive to those entitlements.

[The next idea for the next list, finally, is the starting of the explanation for ‘the beginnings of bookmark use’.

Some viewer discretion for TV series ‘Sabrina, the Teenage Witch’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episodes and series.

Use mental bookmark ‘Not need to be receptive for certain entitlements.’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

7/15/2015

Not the same:

I know that I said I would start ‘the beginnings of bookmark use’ around this time, but a few hours after I finished typing in the disclaimer for Wishlist #1012, this happened at 7/8/2015, I invented another bookmark, and I am still experiencing a mild epiphany for this new bookmark! That means that, based on my experience inventing these bookmarks, not only will this idea be new to you, and that feeling of a new bookmark should appeal to those who have been reading these ideas for a while, but that feeling I have that this new idea still has a sense of epiphany for me means that you will probably experience an epiphany using this new idea as well. And so, the new plan is that I will 1st explain this new bookmark to you, which will probably be done by today, and then the next lists will be dedicated to explaining ‘the beginnings of bookmark use’ to you. Sorry for the change in plans, but I believe this new bookmark may be very useful to you.

1st, I’d like to start using movie ‘As Good as It Gets(1997)’ starring Jack Nicholson as Melvin Udall as the premise for this story. The story will be used to help you understand the idea I invented a week ago. Now, according to the movie ‘As Good as It Gets’, which is available to be watched from Amazon Instant Video(the movie I am using from memory, however, is mostly based on the DVD version of the movie I watched years ago). Only one waitress agrees to serve restaurant customer Melvin Udall, Carol Connelly(Helen Hunt), and Mr. Udall has been eating in that restaurant for many years. The reference I am using from Amazon Instant Video starts 43 minutes and 55 seconds into the movie, when most of the people in the restaurant, including the customers, were giving Mr. Udall a standing ovation when he was told by the owner to leave the restaurant. Based on that scene, I have made an imagined logical conclusion to be used for this advice, and here is the story I imagined:  All of the waitresses that have been working for the restaurant for many years remember when they 1st started serving Mr. Udall. Because of his instigations, the waitresses a few times over the years have participated in group therapy just because of him. Here’s a question for this imagined deduction: ‘Why didn’t the owner of the restaurant remove him as a customer, if Mr. Udall was so troublesome to the waitresses and other customers?’ Before the original owner retired, he talked about Mr. Udall being a customer to his son, who is now the owner of the restaurant. It was pretty much just the one conversation that is important, even though a few words were spoken about him from time to time between father and son. Basically, the father wants his son to keep Mr. Udall as a customer. The father was using some sort of ‘loyalty to the customers’ mentality as the reason for keeping him as a customer. Anyway, that imagined by me background was meant to help you understand how most of the waitresses feel about Mr. Udall. And so, what I’ll do now is just describe one moment of one of the waitresses. This moment happened during the 1st few years when that waitress was serving Mr. Udall. The incident happened when that waitress was not working, when she was at her home fixing the place up, her kids were in school and her husband was at work. While she was fixing the house up, she was thinking about the many times Mr. Udall would do something bothersome to her. Of course, she never raised her voice to him, never presented herself inapppropriately to him. However, even though she never did anything wrong to him, Mr. Udall’s instigations did offend her and make her feel upset, and so, while she was fixing her house, she was making a contemplation argument in her mind about certain instigations from Mr. Udall, and the thinking argument got to the point where she thought of something that was uncharacteristic of her to think about, something that was insulting to Mr. Udall. Soon after she made that uncharacteristic insult in her mind, she stopped her thinking argument, and felt guilty about thinking of such things to Mr. Udall. She quickly reasoned with herself that it was Mr. Udall’s fault for causing her to think in such a way, and of course such an experience caused her to talk about Mr. Udall with the other waitresses. [Now, based on what that lady went through in her home because of Mr. Udall, I made the logical? discovery that, when that lady’s contemplations were insulting Mr. Udall, from what I imagine is the perspective of that lady, her contemplation articulations were not distinguishable from the grievance she was addressing concerning Mr. Udall. She could not discern her own contemplation articulations from the grievance she was addressing. For example, for the adults, before reading this advice(what you did before you actually started reading this idea), how would you go about addressing a grievance contemplationally? Let’s say as an example that applies to some of the adults, a certain grievance would use issues contemplationally introduced to you using contemplation related distress and discomfort to provoke you to contemplationally respond back, and as you would respond back contemplationally, your contemplation articulations may get to the point where you cannot discern your contemplation articulations from the grievance itself. That use of contemplation articulation may create contemplations that are uncharacteristic for you to make, and then you would soon after stop addressing such a grievance. Now, when I invented a possible solution for this situation, it was my belief at the time, and it’s still my belief, that the more important part of this solution was not the solution itself, but the fact that I was able to discover the problem. Since it is my intent to give advice to many schools of thought, if I were to just type in this discovery, that certain instigations may induce a non discernable use of contemplation articulation, that alone can be very valuable to many schools of thought. Other schools of thought would have their own technique, their own appreciations, to process such a discovery, even though I did not type in a solution for it. Of course, the solution I offer you may also be useful to you, and here it is: You simply create a sense of contemplation articulation that is discernable from the impression of interjection of grievance that you are experiencing. The ‘catch phrase’ explanation that you may choose to reference this advice with, like the way you may use a bookmark, is ‘Articulation not the same as impression of interjection of grievance.’, and the ‘understanding bookmark’ is called ‘Not the same.’ To clarify further, the instigation described here addresses contemplation articulations that you use to address certain grievances. There doesn’t have to be any obvious dialogue involved with the instigator. This is something that you just think about privately in your mind. However, even though an instigator may cause you to believe that instigations involving actual words coming from the instigator’s mouth is the source of all of your woes, it is my belief that instigations that cause the use of your contemplation articulations could be the real target of many instigations.

Before I continue further, I’d like to give you a reference for understanding bookmark ‘Not the same.’ The reference according to Amazon Instant Video is located 12 minutes and 36 seconds into movie ‘Mission: Impossible-Ghost Protocol(2011)’. While in a van, Jane(Paula Patton) said to Ethan Hunt(Tom Cruise) quote-‘Messy bringing him along.’, Hunt:-‘I thought it went rather well.’ In spite of the complications involved with removing Bogdan(Miraj Grbic) from jail, according to Ethan Hunt’s use of evaluations, he ‘thought it went rather well’. For example, while I was waiting for a bus in a bus terminal, I thought that 2 women in particular imposed a minor instigation upon me that I suspected was targeting my sense of courtesy and respect. Soon after they imposed the instigation and walked away, I thought to myself quote-‘I thought it went rather well.’, meaning that, in spite of their mild instigation, I was still able to maintain the awareness of courtesy and respect that I intentually offered them, even though those 2 women may have thought that such a courtesy and respect was not adequate enough for them. The intent of the use of the phrase ‘I thought it went rather well.’ is meant to remind you of bookmark ‘Not the same.’ and to help you begin the development of your own sense of contemplation articulation that is used to discern from interjections of grievances.

Here’s a question I believe may be useful for this advice: ‘Is using a sense of contemplation articulation that is discernable from the impression of interjection of grievance the answer itself?’ Before I answer that question, here is the positive effects from the intent of this advice: Once you are able to have and use your own sense of discerning contemplation for certain interjecting grievances, you may be able to be more objective to such grievances contemplationally. That may allow you to more tenably allocate certain evaluation uses associated with such grievances, evaluation uses that may not even be relevant to address! And if you use the waitress story that I typed in, if you were able to manage better how you interact with such grievances, that should help you avoid a lot of unnecessary distress and suffering associated with the addressing of such troublesome grievances. I speculate that in the 1st 3 days of using this idea, the adults that already have issues with such grievances should feel a sense of epiphany. After that, since many of you are also using such ideas to make other ideas, you will probably use evaluations that have results that indicate that this ‘Not the same.’ bookmark is not such a WOW idea. And so, to answer the question, if the answer you seek is to avoid and resolve a certain amount of distress and suffering associated with the addressing of certain grievances that this advice may help you with, and if you are an adult you may already have a few of such grievances from your past experiences, then the answer to that question is ‘Yes, this could be the answer.’ On the other hand, if you are using this advice for other expectations, and the results of those expectations don’t see this advice as such a WOW idea, then, as an example only, the answer may be ‘No.’ I’d also like to say that, based on my interpretations of the episodes from crime solving tv series ‘Bones(2005)’ starring David Boreanaz as Special Agent Seeley Booth, reference refurbished with inapproprieities removed for advice, of course, the crime is never solved within the 1st hour of the show’s investigation, and in each episode, they usually question a few innocent people first before they discover who the criminal is.

Now, although I invented the ‘understanding bookmark’ first, and the understanding bookmark for me was effective on certain instigations for the 1st 2 days that I used it, eventually I invented variations for bookmark ‘Not the same.’, other bookmarks created from bookmark ‘Not the same.’ that can be used contemplationally during or soon after the instigation, a phrase that can address the brunt of the instigation. The 1st bookmark I want to introduce to you is called ‘Restore.’ This is one of those bookmarks that was practically created from it’s reference. According to Amazon Instant Video, the reference is located 1 hour and 4 minutes into movie ‘Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan(1982)’, from the words of Spock(Leonard Nimoy). Here is the entire quote:

Kirk(William Shatner)-‘Captain Spock, damage report.’

Spock-‘Admiral, if we go by the book, like Lieutenant Saavik, hours could seem like days.’

Kirk-‘I read you, Captain. Let’s have it.’

Spock-‘The situation is grave, Admiral. We won’t have main power for six days. Auxiliary power has temporarily failed. Restoration may be possible in two days. By the book, Admiral.

Kirk-‘Meaning you can’t even beam us back?’

Spock-‘Not at present.’

Kirk-‘Captain Spock…if you don’t hear from us within one hour, your orders are to restore what power you can, take the Enterprise to the nearest star base, and alert Starfleet command as soon as you are out of jamming range.’

An instigator may improperly impose upon you a false sense of restoring. Refurbished for advice, of course, Spock and Kirk gave Khan(Ricardo Montalban) a false sense of restoring that the Enterprise needs to repair itself, and according to the movie, the deception worked. In my opinion, not only is the reference from movie ‘Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan’ the best quote I can think of for bookmark ‘Restore.’, it also involves adult men and women, which means that this quote should be easier for adults to use it, and also the quote is from a science fiction movie. It is from my experience that science fiction tv shows and movies are easier to refurbish, since such references are designed to be easily discernable from ‘real world’ living. Also, the circumstance of the quote itself encourages you to use some strategy, even if it’s just in the context of a movie.
The levitra professional veins and arteries of the organ get extra blood that makes the muscles relaxed. Ian McGrath, a professor of physiology at the University of Glasgow says, “lowest price levitra corrects problems in people who are allergic to Sildenafil or any other ingredient of Caverta 100 mg Tablets should keep away from this drug. Why Kamagra 100mg? Some of the benefiting factors:1) FDA approved: Kamagra medicine is FDA and quality approved so that the users get to not only engage themselves with hard erection but also maintain their health during and after school classes, as parents are order cialis online actually happy with the distance learning programs. It is the natural remedies that can bring permanent buy cheap viagra unica-web.com solution to the problem.
[I’d like to stop now and finish this idea next week. And this time, since I still have epiphany for this idea, and it’s been a week since I invented it, I plan to just finish this explanation next week, and soon after finishing it’s explanation, I plan to start ‘the beginnings of bookmark use’.

7/22/2015

I just spent over 2 hours today searching for a DVD or Blu-ray that I could rent that would give me some incentive to finish typing this idea. In case you are interested, my search for the DVD or Blu-ray was in web site www.imdb.com. At the bottom of imdb.com’s home web site is an option called ‘Site Index’. Click it, go to the bottom of that page, and there’s an option called ‘Year’. Click ‘Year’, and you are shown a large movie selection based on year. I started with year ‘2015’ and continued to select the years based on descending order(2014, 2013, 2012, etc.) until I stopped at year ‘2001’. For example, if you click year ‘2015’, at the end of the 10 movies it shows you, there’s an option that says ‘show more’. If you click that, on the top of that page, it gives you sorting options. What I did was click ‘US Box Office’, and it gives a description and picture of the movie based on how much money the movie made in American theaters in descending order, 50 at a time. So, basically, the 1st 50 movies shown made the most money from American theaters. What I mostly did was quickly view the 1st 200 movies using option ‘US Box Office’ in descending order from year 2015 to year 2001. That took me over 2 hours to look at, and I did not find a movie for this list. However, even though I did not find one to rent, if you are looking for a movie to watch, you may want to look at imdb.com to see if you can find something to rent on DVD or Blu-ray, if you have a DVD/Blu-ray rental service. And so, what I am going to use is an option I found earlier. I am going to get a membership for a short moment only(whatever short term membership they have available) from web site www.funimation.com in order to watch their latest ‘Ghost in the Shell: Arise’ episodes. According to web site www.wikipedia.com, 2 episodes were made available last month. I am not recommending for you to watch those episodes. I am just typing this in to let you know what I am using for motivation to type the rest of this idea in.

Articulation not the same as impression of interjection of grievance:

To finish this advice, I am just going to try to explain bookmark ‘Articulation not the same as impression of interjection of grievance.’. It is also called ‘Not the same.’ Earlier in this list, I used a story I imagined from movie ‘As Good as It Gets(1997)’, what one of the waitresses in the movie went through while she was home in the 1st years of serving Mr. Udall(Jack Nicholson) breakfast. I figured that if I explain this one example to you, you can imagine having an understanding as to why most of the waitresses in the ‘As Good as It Gets’ movie will not serve Mr. Udall any food. Using that as an example, I was going to give you an example that may help your situation with bookmark ‘Not the same.’, whether you were experiencing such an instigation, or you may reference such an idea in case you may find it useful in the future. So, basically, this is how the instigation works: An instigator using a past instigation would encourage you later to contemplationally address interjections of notions that use distress as part of it’s identity. This creates an escalation of contemplation that may lead into a use of contemplation articulation that is indistinguishable/not discernable from the grievance you are addressing. And during such an instigation, when you can no longer sense the difference between your own contemplation articulations and the grievance, what may occur is that you create a contemplation response that is ‘out of character’ than how you would normally respond. For example, the ‘out of character’ response for adults could be something contemplationally said involving an insult. For teenagers and adults(keep in mind that I am imagining these ideas. I am not a psychiatrist), it could be an out of character contemplation outburst of anger. Anyway, soon after you realize you made such an out of character response, you stop addressing the grievance. Several feelings may occur soon afterwards, such as feeling disappointed because you made such an out of character response, a certain awkwardness as you try to acclimate the experience, along those lines.

[And so, after I discovered such a possibility, I quickly made the logical conclusion that one possible solution for such an instigation was for you to simply create a sense of contemplation articulation that is discernable from the interjections of notions that are usually identified by distress as part of it’s identity that are coming from the grievance you are choosing to address. Now, this is the part that I have thought about the 1st few days after 7/15. After I have stopped explaining this advice, I imagined that some of the kids that are reading this idea may have thought that when I said to ‘create a sense of contemplation articulation’, they may have created a sense of contemplation articulation that involved actual words in thought. Soon after I imagined that, I certainly considered to type a clarification in this blog, but if you read the last paragraph I typed in on 7/15, it says quote-‘I’d like to stop now and finish this idea next week.’. In other words, based on my own explanation, it’s obvious that I didn’t finish explaining the idea, and that I plan to finish explaining the idea next week. Of course, if I believed it was urgent enough, I would clarify more the statement-‘to create a sense of contemplation articulation’ before today. Also, I would like to add that, for the kids, if you plan to give advice in your own blog, and you are not able to finish the explanation, I am not very familiar with using WordPress, but I assume you can make a draft of the explanation 1st before making it available for others to read. If, however, you choose to type it in like the way I am doing it, you may simply say to those who are reading your blog that you have not finished explaining this idea, and that you plan to finish explaining it at another time, within reason, of course. For example, I am just typing in advice to help people with their problems experiencing instigation. I am not typing in something that depends upon unusually technical detail, like instructions to put together some sort of engine.

[Anyway, going back to the statement ‘to create a sense of contemplation articulation’, what I meant was to create a sense that you can associate to a sense of contemplation articulation. For example, in the movie ‘The Blues Brothers(1980)’, if memory serves, there was a scene when Jake and Elwood were in an elevator, and music was being played in the elevator. It is my experience that music from elevators are designed to give you a neutral, calm feeling. Another example is when you are placed on hold when you are trying to talk to make an appointment for something by phone. Sometimes when you are placed on hold by phone, music designed to induce a neutral, calm feeling is played for you to hear. As an example, you may use an imagined sense of what you may get from elevator music or being placed on hold by phone music as an association to some sort of reasonable contemplation articulation. In other words, you are just using the sense of it to represent contemplation articulation, not actual contemplation articulation words. If some of the kids using this advice are offended by the misunderstanding, the misunderstanding only lasted a week, and I certainly did consider clarifying the meaning earlier, but I didn’t think it was necessary for me to do so. Also, I was planning to finish the explanation in a week anyway. I can see why there is a possible misunderstanding, since a ‘feeling’ is not ‘articulation’. However, based on how I invented this idea, you may choose to use a ‘feeling’ to associate to a chosen contemplation ‘articulation’. Of course, you decide what the reasonable ‘feeling’ is, and what your basic contemplation articulation would be.

[Here is an explanation why creating a sense of contemplation articulation to be discernable from impressions of interjections from a grievance you choose to think about may be useful to you. If you look at an instigation identified by bookmark ‘Not the same.'(such as moments refurbished for advice from movie ‘As Good As It Gets’), you may notice that it may try to impose upon you interjections of notions whose identity uses distress. Now, before this advice, what you may have done with those interjections of distress was address those interjections, try to resolve those interjections. However, addressing such notions of distress may have created the effect of escalating the problem further. Now, with your newly invented sense of articulation that is discernable from the interjections of distress, you may notice that you have experienced a sense of epiphany, an epiphany that based on my own experiences may last a week. Also, if you have invented such a sense of articulation, you are now more objective when you think about such interjecting notions of distress. Here is the best example I can think of right now for objectively interacting with interjections of distress induced by an instigation. It’s not a match for this advice, but I still believe you can use it for illustration. This example comes from a movie with inappropriate material in it, so if you cannot remove the inappropriate material, then you don’t have to use this advice. However, the reference itself, even though it only exists as a short moment in the movie, may still be useful to you, and of course even that reference is refurbished for advice. I recently watched for the 1st time Blu-ray rental ‘Unfinished Business(2015)’ starring Vince Vaughn as Dan Trunkman, and the reference is near the end of that movie, when Mr. Trunkman is talking to Mr. Daaervk, the man he is trying to get a business agreement with. Mr. Daaervk said to Mr. Trunkman in a context that Mr. Trunkman was not prepared for, to fire one of his employees. A little unsettled, Mr. Trunkman said to Mr. Daaervk quote-‘He work extremely hard on this sheet. I stand by what he did.’ Soon after Mr. Trunkman said that, Mr. Daaervk said to Mr. Trunkman quote-‘I’m just kidding.’, and then Mr. Trunkman laughs. Because of that moment, even though Mr. Daaervk agreed to do business with Mr. Trunkman, it still took a short moment for Mr. Trunkman to collect himself and realize that he just made a business agreement with Mr. Daaervk. Now, in imagination of course, I created the situation when Mr. Daaervk said to Mr. Trunkman to fire one of his employees, he gave Mr. Trunkman some thinking room to give Mr. Trunkman an answer. Let me demonstrate. Let’s turn Mr. Trunkman’s statement ‘Fire him.’ into two options, 1)if you fire him, you get the contract, and 2)if you don’t fire him, you don’t get the contract.  [Mr. Trunkman’s response did not choose those 2 options. Instead, Mr. Trunkman said-‘He worked extremely hard on this sheet. I stand by what he did.’ My point is that Mr. Daaervk allowed Mr. Trunkman to choose another option. However, when you experience an instigation that improperly imposes interjections of distress, I believe it is very likely that such instigations by design may cause you to address the options they obviously present to you, and not give you a chance to address other reasonable possibilities. Also, keep in mind that the instigation could be out of context and not relevant to begin with. Of course, there are other instigations that are not so easily quantified, but have you also experienced instigations that are also absurdly direct in being out of context and not relevant?

[This is the part where I type in the disclaimer and finish this idea, but right not I choose to stop explaining this idea, and I will finish typing in the disclaimer next week. I want to watch the ‘Ghost in the Shell: Arise’ motivation I gave myself today. To reiterate, I am not recommending ‘Ghost in the Shell’ for this advice. I don’t think it will take very long to type in the disclaimer next week, so what will happen next week I also plan to finally start ‘the beginnings of bookmark use’ explanation.

7/28/2015

Violence, viewer discretion for movies ‘As Good As It Gets’, ‘Mission Impossible-Ghost Protocol’, Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan’, and ‘Unfinished Business’. Violence and viewer discretion for series ‘Bones’. Use only refurbished for advice references recommended. Throw away rest of episode, series, and movie.

Use mental bookmarks ‘Articulation not the same as impression of interjection of grievance.’ and ‘Articulation not the same.’ for reference, allocation, and prevention when needed.

[Tomorrow, I plan to start explaining ‘The beginnings of bookmark use.’ finally.

[For the kids who are reading this stuff who believe they are not understanding these ideas as much as they should, I recommend you think ‘bigger picture’. If you have read it, and have sincerely tried to learn from it, then what you have learned from it may be useful for the next ideas that I plan to type in. Also, it’s possible that concepts you were not able to understand in the past you may be able to understand in the future. Also, my benefit from what I have learned may still be your benefit. Anyway, I plan to continue the new ideas tomorrow.